Are EVs truly a cost-saving revolution? Or are they just fancy gadgets with a hidden price tag?
One Reddit user, armed with spreadsheets, has taken it upon himself to track the cost per mile of his Tesla Model 3 and Chevy Bolt against his trusty, old-school Toyota Corolla.

The results are surprisingly counterintuitive, shattering some common EV myths and revealing a few hard truths about the cost of owning an electric car.
50,000-Mile Cost Breakdown of Tesla Model 3 vs. Chevy Bolt vs. Toyota Corolla
Erv, shared some insights and data on r/electricvehicles after driving 50,000 miles across a Tesla Model 3 and Chevy Bolt EUV. The kicker? His old Toyota Corolla still beats them both in one crucial metric.
"I have a separate meter for my 2023 Tesla Model 3 RWD that I use to track energy use, efficiency, cost (and cost-savings), etc., and compare back to very detailed data I kept on my previous ICE car.
Given I've now driven >30,000 miles, it felt like a good time to share the data, and because I had it, I also shared comparisons to the Bolt EUV.
*I benchmarked the fuel costs against my prior car, a Toyota Corolla, which got 33.17 mpg over the 100,000+ miles I tracked it, and I also benchmarked against current gas prices, which in my area have been roughly $3/gallon, but I am using nuanced monthly averages for my state. I also bake in a $30 oil change per 5,000 miles as "fuel".
**I also calculated the portion of my savings that is due to taxes I'm not paying at the pump (0.285+0.184 per gallon) - which is relevant politically given we can expect a $250/year EV surcharge to attempt to "close that loophole", which for me, looks to be "fair" if it were state + federal, but just being federal and combined with my state's surcharge ($75), it is not.
I have insurance, tabs, depreciation, maintenance, as well but wanted to focus on "fuel". Those costs are all higher than the Corolla due to the Tesla (and Bolt) being much newer cars (and fully insured instead of minimally insured), and the heightened costs do offset the fuel savings for now. I'll be curious to see over 100,000+ miles how the total cost to own tightens up and I expect the Tesla to win out.
Currently, depreciation/any cost of the vehicle, the Tesla is already winning at 15c/mile vs. the Corolla's 16c/mile due to the cheaper maintenance and fuel despite the higher insurance and tabs. But taking into account depreciation changes, that comparison to $0.34 vs. $0.20 in favor of the Corolla, for now. Which is a price I'm comfortable paying for enhanced safety, comfort, etc.
EFFICIENCY
Because it's always interesting to discuss - this is my "efficiency" based on the electricity I am actually paying for, so it includes losses (and I am adding in charging away from home, but that's been extremely minimal). The Tesla itself reports a different number: 239 Mi/kWh (vs 296), which is partially due to losses and partially due to the car not reporting preconditioning. Similarly, the Tesla app says 8,771 kWh charged vs. I have logged 9,028 (a 3% variance), which tells me the 20% variance on Mi/kWh is primarily preconditioning and not charging losses, which is surprising given I do not precondition very frequently and I do not use Sentry. I charge L2."
Tesla Model 3 vs. Chevy Bolt EUV: Performance, Range, and Space Comparison
- The Tesla Model 3 offers a dual-motor all-wheel-drive system producing 460 horsepower, achieving 0–60 mph in 2.9 seconds, with an EPA-estimated range of up to 342 miles. In contrast, the Chevrolet Bolt EUV features a single front-mounted motor delivering 200 horsepower, reaching 0–60 mph in approximately 7 seconds, and provides an EPA-estimated range of 247 miles.
- The Model 3, a compact sedan, offers 97 cubic feet of passenger volume and 24 cubic feet of cargo space. The Bolt EUV, a subcompact crossover, provides similar passenger volume at 97 cubic feet but offers slightly less cargo space at 16.3 cubic feet.
- Tesla's Model 3 includes a minimalist interior with a 15-inch touchscreen interface, advanced driver-assistance features, and access to Tesla's Supercharger network. The Bolt EUV comes equipped with Chevrolet's infotainment system, supports Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and offers GM's Super Cruise hands-free driving technology on compatible roads.
- The 2025 Tesla Model 3 starts at approximately $42,490, positioning it in the premium EV segment. The Chevrolet Bolt EUV offered a more affordable entry point, with prices starting around $27,800, making it one of the most budget-friendly electric vehicles available at the time of its release.
Erv, in the kind of methodical tone that could make an actuary swoon, detailed everything: kilowatt-hours, miles per gallon equivalent (MPGe), oil changes priced to the penny, and even the political nuances of gas taxes and EV surcharges.

According to his logs, the Model 3 RWD clocked in at 15 cents per mile in fuel and maintenance. The Bolt? Slightly worse. But even those figures paled next to his dearly departed Corolla, which, once depreciation was factored in, ran just 20 cents per mile overall. The Tesla ballooned to 34 cents. That’s not a minor difference.
Depreciation and Maintenance, How Reddit Users React to True EV Ownership Costs
The Reddit horde, predictably, pounced. One commenter, Hsaphoto, praised the inclusion of depreciation: the forgotten financial bogeyman. Another, neutralpoliticsbot, scoffed at the $30 oil change estimate with a sarcastic “$30 oil change where?”, the internet equivalent of flipping a table.

Erv held the line, citing years of discount coupons and standard oil. Welcome to Reddit, where every car becomes a case study and every assumption gets litigated like a class-action suit.
Beyond the Spreadsheet, User-Reported Efficiency and Cost Highlights from Bolt and Hybrid Owners
One Bolt owner, Low_Thanks_1540, bragged about getting 5.1 mi/kWh in Detroit, averaging just 3 cents per mile. Another user brought their Ford Maverick hybrid into the ring, reporting a paltry $0.129 per mile in operating costs. Suddenly, the Model 3's efficiency crown didn’t feel quite so regal.
The Tesla still wins where it matters to many, comfort, safety, and long-term efficiency. It delivered 114 MPGe versus the Bolt’s 103, despite colder temps and nearly 11,000 more miles logged. And with LFP batteries under the floorboards and a 239 mi/kWh efficiency reported by the car itself (after adjusting for preconditioning losses), the Model 3 proved not only cost-effective but technologically superior. As one user noted, “It’s well documented that the Tesla Model 3 RWD is more efficient than a Bolt with all things being equal.” The key phrase is that all things being equal, which in the real world, they rarely are.
MPGe Demystified, How EPA’s Miles-Per-Gallon-Equivalent Rating Works for EV Buyers
- MPGe is determined by equating the energy content of electricity to that of gasoline. Specifically, 33.7 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity is considered equivalent to one gallon of gasoline. To calculate MPGe, the distance an electric vehicle can travel on 33.7 kWh is measured, allowing for a comparison with traditional miles-per-gallon (MPG) ratings of gasoline vehicles.
- MPGe was introduced to provide consumers with a familiar metric to compare the energy efficiency of electric vehicles (EVs) to that of internal combustion engine vehicles. By translating electric energy consumption into a gasoline-equivalent format, it aims to simplify the decision-making process for potential EV buyers.
- While MPGe offers a standardized measure, it doesn't account for various real-world factors such as driving habits, terrain, climate conditions, and accessory usage (like air conditioning), all of which can significantly impact an EV's actual efficiency. Consequently, two vehicles with similar MPGe ratings might perform differently under everyday driving conditions.
- MPGe focuses solely on the energy consumed by the vehicle during operation, neglecting the efficiency and environmental impact of electricity generation and transmission. For instance, electricity produced from renewable sources has a different environmental footprint compared to that generated from fossil fuels, but MPGe does not differentiate between them.
Still, the most revealing part of this Reddit saga was the emotional math. Erv knows his Tesla costs more. He admits it. But he’s comfortable paying that premium for the intangible upgrades, refined ride, cleaner footprint, and the sense that he’s driving the future. That, right there, is the fine print most car reviews miss. We’re not always chasing the cheapest ride. Sometimes, we’re chasing the one that feels right. Even if it costs 14 cents more per mile.
Shifts in Car Ownership
So what does this all mean? It means the automotive world is no longer defined solely by horsepower and leather trim. It’s defined by kilowatt-hours, tax credits, and Reddit threads that dissect your every mile like a neurosurgeon studying a brain scan.
The EV revolution forces you to confront what you value, numbers or nuance, cost or conscience. And if you’re still wondering whether to switch, don’t just take it from the marketing brochures. Sit down with the math geniuses in the back booth of Reddit and let them show you what owning an EV actually costs.
Because in the end, the Tesla might feel like the future, the Bolt might get you there frugally, and the Corolla? That humble little gas-sipper might still be the most honest ride of all.
Have you done your own cost breakdown on EV ownership versus your previous ICE vehicles? What unexpected costs or savings did you encounter? Share your experiences with us in the comments!
Image Sources: Tesla Media Center, Chevy Newsroom, KBCustoms Facebook Page, Joseph L Young Sr. Facebook Page
Noah Washington is an automotive journalist based in Atlanta, Georgia. He enjoys covering the latest news in the automotive industry and conducting reviews on the latest cars. He has been in the automotive industry since 15 years old and has been featured in prominent automotive news sites. You can reach him on X and LinkedIn for tips and to follow his automotive coverage.

Comments
What's the gas price used in…
Permalink
What's the gas price used in the calculation? And electricity price? Gas price is largely different in areas, also electricity price differs in area and time.
Good question! I based it on…
Permalink
In reply to What's the gas price used in… by Jd (not verified)
Good question! I based it on typical gas prices and local electricity rates but you’re right it varies depending on where you are.
Cost isn’t everything. I…
Permalink
Cost isn’t everything. I love my i3 for the quiet ride, quick acceleration, ease of charging at home, and best of all low maintenance plus not having to deal with gasoline.
Got it! The quiet drive and…
Permalink
In reply to Cost isn’t everything. I… by William Spencer (not verified)
Got it! The quiet drive and easy home charging really make a difference. Comfort and convenience go beyond dollars and cents.
I’ll take anything…
Permalink
I’ll take anything competitive with the Nazicar. I will never support what this company produces because of what it represents. My money will always be spent with companies that are responsible and honorable. Never Tesla.
Yeah it’s great to stick to…
Permalink
In reply to I’ll take anything… by LM MIT. (not verified)
Yeah it’s great to stick to your values and luckily there are plenty of EV options to match different priorities.
I live in WA where the…
Permalink
I live in WA where the electricity price just increased to a nudge over $0.07 per KWh. My 2023 Tesla Model Y dual motor long range has averaged 4.14 miles/KWh over the life of the car. This works out to $3.38 per 200 mile charge (20% - 80%). If the price of gasoline were $3.38 (low for here), that would be 200 m/Ge.
I don't take this on long trips, my average speed is around 40 mph, which probably explains the mileage difference.
The article didn't explicitly give the price of electricity which makes it hard to factor these numbers for comparison. Not pointing out the zero depreciation numbers on the Toyota just skews the data; that could have been pointed out better.
Thanks for the feedback! You…
Permalink
In reply to I live in WA where the… by David Whipple (not verified)
Thanks for the feedback! You're right I should've included electricity prices for better comparisons. Good catch on the speed and efficiency connection too.
The Tesla LR is not getting…
Permalink
The Tesla LR is not getting 0-60 in 2.9. That would be the performance model.
What's the cost comparison if you're charging at home with solar?
Yeah 2.9 sec is for the…
Permalink
In reply to The Tesla LR is not getting… by Bob (not verified)
Yeah 2.9 sec is for the performance model. Solar charging definitely lowers costs a lot!
One major factor that is…
Permalink
One major factor that is glaringly obvious here, sticker price of Corolla vs Tesla. Something to think about. Throw in the Volt as well.
Without the capital costs…
Permalink
Without the capital costs the total costs are misleading. The opportunity costs need to be included to get a real picture of the true costs of ownership.
Oh yes sticker price is huge…
Permalink
In reply to Without the capital costs… by Craig Laurent (not verified)
Oh yes sticker price is huge and needs to be part of the discussion. Adding cars like the Volt makes sense for better coverage. Appreciate the input!
Yeah, opportunity costs…
Permalink
In reply to Without the capital costs… by Craig Laurent (not verified)
Yeah, opportunity costs definitely add important context to total ownership expenses.
What is not mentioned is…
Permalink
What is not mentioned is pollution - isn't electric a MUCH better option for the earth?
EVs usually have a much…
Permalink
In reply to What is not mentioned is… by Ruth Fleming (not verified)
EVs usually have a much smaller environmental impact overall.
Does anybody have…
Permalink
Does anybody have information how the 2016 Prius 4 touring compares to this situation ?
I don’t have data on the…
Permalink
In reply to Does anybody have… by Pete100347 (not verified)
I don’t have data on the 2016 Prius 4 Touring but that’d be a great comparison.
What happens when you…
Permalink
What happens when you compare a so far NA Chinese Model 3 equivalent without tariff?
Given expected battery technology advancements, is that included in Model 3 depreciation? How about cost to replace; not due to the battery wearing out but the relative improvements promised in new tech batteries?
In short, I have this concern about being an early adapter of a rapidly changing technology, better cheaper EV not too far down the road
Ron
Good point about the rapid…
Permalink
In reply to What happens when you… by Ron Bullock (not verified)
Good point about the rapid tech changes early adopters definitely face higher replacement costs and faster depreciation. That's a valid concern.
I would love to know what…
Permalink
I would love to know what year the Coralla was. Our is a 2000.
Thanks!
The Corolla I used is a 2018…
Permalink
In reply to I would love to know what… by kmgeissel (not verified)
The Corolla I used is a 2018 model. Thanks for asking!
Just out of curiosity, where…
Permalink
Just out of curiosity, where are you getting those $30 high mileage oil changes? Also are you aware that many newer combustion cars require midgrade or premium gas?
Great question! I used local…
Permalink
In reply to Just out of curiosity, where… by Vex (not verified)
Great question! I used local shop prices for basic oil changes and prices vary a lot. And yes newer cars needing premium gas definitely adds to the cost.
It's not about the cost per…
Permalink
It's not about the cost per mile, it's somewhat about saving the planet, using no oil, and Teslas are smart, very fast acceleration, smooth ride, comfortable, great route finding, blue line or self driving, WiFi updating, and so much more.
Was it just gas prices or also oil prices and all the other costs associated to figure the per mile cost?
We have solar so sunshine primarily fuels our car.
We also have a Prius Prime that we use for short drives, last bought gas over a year ago, it also charges on sunshine.
Absolutely! EVs bring so…
Permalink
In reply to It's not about the cost per… by Barb (not verified)
Absolutely! EVs bring so much more than just cost savings. The solar charging, smooth ride, and tech features make a huge difference. Smart move including gas, oil, and maintenance in your cost comparison.
I can guarantee the Bolt is…
Permalink
I can guarantee the Bolt is the cheapest car to run. I picked up a Bolt for 16k 2 years ago and have heard of people getting them for as low as 10k with brand new batteries. Anyways, I drive 30k miles per year and it saves me around 2k dollars just in gas alone every year and another $500 in maintenance. I sold my 2015 Subaru Forester that was getting around 30mpg to get my Bolt. Power in my area is 4.5 cents per KW so it's cheap to drive. It is not a road trip car though because it charges to slowly, newer cars can charge in 20 min though. I have only needed to buy tires once in the last 2 year and they are only $160 per tire. I pay a $200 tax every year to makeup for gas tax. I've had no maintenance other than putting in window washer fluid and buying tires once. Anyways, maintenance is cheap, power is cheap , tires are cheap and it's the best car I've ever owned. I will drive it until it dies, then buy another one for even less because they will be under 10k at that point.
That's awesome! Sounds like…
Permalink
In reply to I can guarantee the Bolt is… by Travis (not verified)
That's awesome! Sounds like your Bolt is a real winner. Low power rates and minimal upkeep make a huge difference. thanks for sharing your experience!
Are you changing the oil?…
Permalink
Are you changing the oil? That cost does seem low for oil and a new filter. $30
Yes $30 covers a basic oil…
Permalink
In reply to Are you changing the oil?… by Jeffrey Linduska (not verified)
Yes $30 covers a basic oil change locally but prices depend on you location. Thanks for asking!
Pagination