Are EVs truly a cost-saving revolution? Or are they just fancy gadgets with a hidden price tag?
One Reddit user, armed with spreadsheets, has taken it upon himself to track the cost per mile of his Tesla Model 3 and Chevy Bolt against his trusty, old-school Toyota Corolla.

The results are surprisingly counterintuitive, shattering some common EV myths and revealing a few hard truths about the cost of owning an electric car.
50,000-Mile Cost Breakdown of Tesla Model 3 vs. Chevy Bolt vs. Toyota Corolla
Erv, shared some insights and data on r/electricvehicles after driving 50,000 miles across a Tesla Model 3 and Chevy Bolt EUV. The kicker? His old Toyota Corolla still beats them both in one crucial metric.
"I have a separate meter for my 2023 Tesla Model 3 RWD that I use to track energy use, efficiency, cost (and cost-savings), etc., and compare back to very detailed data I kept on my previous ICE car.
Given I've now driven >30,000 miles, it felt like a good time to share the data, and because I had it, I also shared comparisons to the Bolt EUV.
*I benchmarked the fuel costs against my prior car, a Toyota Corolla, which got 33.17 mpg over the 100,000+ miles I tracked it, and I also benchmarked against current gas prices, which in my area have been roughly $3/gallon, but I am using nuanced monthly averages for my state. I also bake in a $30 oil change per 5,000 miles as "fuel".
**I also calculated the portion of my savings that is due to taxes I'm not paying at the pump (0.285+0.184 per gallon) - which is relevant politically given we can expect a $250/year EV surcharge to attempt to "close that loophole", which for me, looks to be "fair" if it were state + federal, but just being federal and combined with my state's surcharge ($75), it is not.
I have insurance, tabs, depreciation, maintenance, as well but wanted to focus on "fuel". Those costs are all higher than the Corolla due to the Tesla (and Bolt) being much newer cars (and fully insured instead of minimally insured), and the heightened costs do offset the fuel savings for now. I'll be curious to see over 100,000+ miles how the total cost to own tightens up and I expect the Tesla to win out.
Currently, depreciation/any cost of the vehicle, the Tesla is already winning at 15c/mile vs. the Corolla's 16c/mile due to the cheaper maintenance and fuel despite the higher insurance and tabs. But taking into account depreciation changes, that comparison to $0.34 vs. $0.20 in favor of the Corolla, for now. Which is a price I'm comfortable paying for enhanced safety, comfort, etc.
EFFICIENCY
Because it's always interesting to discuss - this is my "efficiency" based on the electricity I am actually paying for, so it includes losses (and I am adding in charging away from home, but that's been extremely minimal). The Tesla itself reports a different number: 239 Mi/kWh (vs 296), which is partially due to losses and partially due to the car not reporting preconditioning. Similarly, the Tesla app says 8,771 kWh charged vs. I have logged 9,028 (a 3% variance), which tells me the 20% variance on Mi/kWh is primarily preconditioning and not charging losses, which is surprising given I do not precondition very frequently and I do not use Sentry. I charge L2."
Tesla Model 3 vs. Chevy Bolt EUV: Performance, Range, and Space Comparison
- The Tesla Model 3 offers a dual-motor all-wheel-drive system producing 460 horsepower, achieving 0–60 mph in 2.9 seconds, with an EPA-estimated range of up to 342 miles. In contrast, the Chevrolet Bolt EUV features a single front-mounted motor delivering 200 horsepower, reaching 0–60 mph in approximately 7 seconds, and provides an EPA-estimated range of 247 miles.
- The Model 3, a compact sedan, offers 97 cubic feet of passenger volume and 24 cubic feet of cargo space. The Bolt EUV, a subcompact crossover, provides similar passenger volume at 97 cubic feet but offers slightly less cargo space at 16.3 cubic feet.
- Tesla's Model 3 includes a minimalist interior with a 15-inch touchscreen interface, advanced driver-assistance features, and access to Tesla's Supercharger network. The Bolt EUV comes equipped with Chevrolet's infotainment system, supports Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and offers GM's Super Cruise hands-free driving technology on compatible roads.
- The 2025 Tesla Model 3 starts at approximately $42,490, positioning it in the premium EV segment. The Chevrolet Bolt EUV offered a more affordable entry point, with prices starting around $27,800, making it one of the most budget-friendly electric vehicles available at the time of its release.
Erv, in the kind of methodical tone that could make an actuary swoon, detailed everything: kilowatt-hours, miles per gallon equivalent (MPGe), oil changes priced to the penny, and even the political nuances of gas taxes and EV surcharges.

According to his logs, the Model 3 RWD clocked in at 15 cents per mile in fuel and maintenance. The Bolt? Slightly worse. But even those figures paled next to his dearly departed Corolla, which, once depreciation was factored in, ran just 20 cents per mile overall. The Tesla ballooned to 34 cents. That’s not a minor difference.
Depreciation and Maintenance, How Reddit Users React to True EV Ownership Costs
The Reddit horde, predictably, pounced. One commenter, Hsaphoto, praised the inclusion of depreciation: the forgotten financial bogeyman. Another, neutralpoliticsbot, scoffed at the $30 oil change estimate with a sarcastic “$30 oil change where?”, the internet equivalent of flipping a table.

Erv held the line, citing years of discount coupons and standard oil. Welcome to Reddit, where every car becomes a case study and every assumption gets litigated like a class-action suit.
Beyond the Spreadsheet, User-Reported Efficiency and Cost Highlights from Bolt and Hybrid Owners
One Bolt owner, Low_Thanks_1540, bragged about getting 5.1 mi/kWh in Detroit, averaging just 3 cents per mile. Another user brought their Ford Maverick hybrid into the ring, reporting a paltry $0.129 per mile in operating costs. Suddenly, the Model 3's efficiency crown didn’t feel quite so regal.
The Tesla still wins where it matters to many, comfort, safety, and long-term efficiency. It delivered 114 MPGe versus the Bolt’s 103, despite colder temps and nearly 11,000 more miles logged. And with LFP batteries under the floorboards and a 239 mi/kWh efficiency reported by the car itself (after adjusting for preconditioning losses), the Model 3 proved not only cost-effective but technologically superior. As one user noted, “It’s well documented that the Tesla Model 3 RWD is more efficient than a Bolt with all things being equal.” The key phrase is that all things being equal, which in the real world, they rarely are.
MPGe Demystified, How EPA’s Miles-Per-Gallon-Equivalent Rating Works for EV Buyers
- MPGe is determined by equating the energy content of electricity to that of gasoline. Specifically, 33.7 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity is considered equivalent to one gallon of gasoline. To calculate MPGe, the distance an electric vehicle can travel on 33.7 kWh is measured, allowing for a comparison with traditional miles-per-gallon (MPG) ratings of gasoline vehicles.
- MPGe was introduced to provide consumers with a familiar metric to compare the energy efficiency of electric vehicles (EVs) to that of internal combustion engine vehicles. By translating electric energy consumption into a gasoline-equivalent format, it aims to simplify the decision-making process for potential EV buyers.
- While MPGe offers a standardized measure, it doesn't account for various real-world factors such as driving habits, terrain, climate conditions, and accessory usage (like air conditioning), all of which can significantly impact an EV's actual efficiency. Consequently, two vehicles with similar MPGe ratings might perform differently under everyday driving conditions.
- MPGe focuses solely on the energy consumed by the vehicle during operation, neglecting the efficiency and environmental impact of electricity generation and transmission. For instance, electricity produced from renewable sources has a different environmental footprint compared to that generated from fossil fuels, but MPGe does not differentiate between them.
Still, the most revealing part of this Reddit saga was the emotional math. Erv knows his Tesla costs more. He admits it. But he’s comfortable paying that premium for the intangible upgrades, refined ride, cleaner footprint, and the sense that he’s driving the future. That, right there, is the fine print most car reviews miss. We’re not always chasing the cheapest ride. Sometimes, we’re chasing the one that feels right. Even if it costs 14 cents more per mile.
Shifts in Car Ownership
So what does this all mean? It means the automotive world is no longer defined solely by horsepower and leather trim. It’s defined by kilowatt-hours, tax credits, and Reddit threads that dissect your every mile like a neurosurgeon studying a brain scan.
The EV revolution forces you to confront what you value, numbers or nuance, cost or conscience. And if you’re still wondering whether to switch, don’t just take it from the marketing brochures. Sit down with the math geniuses in the back booth of Reddit and let them show you what owning an EV actually costs.
Because in the end, the Tesla might feel like the future, the Bolt might get you there frugally, and the Corolla? That humble little gas-sipper might still be the most honest ride of all.
Have you done your own cost breakdown on EV ownership versus your previous ICE vehicles? What unexpected costs or savings did you encounter? Share your experiences with us in the comments!
Image Sources: Tesla Media Center, Chevy Newsroom, KBCustoms Facebook Page, Joseph L Young Sr. Facebook Page
Noah Washington is an automotive journalist based in Atlanta, Georgia. He enjoys covering the latest news in the automotive industry and conducting reviews on the latest cars. He has been in the automotive industry since 15 years old and has been featured in prominent automotive news sites. You can reach him on X and LinkedIn for tips and to follow his automotive coverage.

Comments
Indeed! Their overall…
Permalink
In reply to China is getting rid of gas… by Dan (not verified)
Indeed! Their overall pollution levels are concerning. It'll be a big issue for sure.
Exactly! Cleaner air in…
Permalink
In reply to WRONG old cars POLLUTE toxic… by Terrence Robb (not verified)
Exactly! Cleaner air in urban areas is one of the most immediate and impactful upsides of EVs. Thanks for pointing that out!
Instead of MPGe, I think…
Permalink
Instead of MPGe, I think MPCe (miles per cost equivalent is a more accurate measure. How many miles can an EV be driven for the same cost as a gallon of gas.
Love that idea! Way more…
Permalink
In reply to Instead of MPGe, I think… by Rick Enochs (not verified)
Love that idea! Way more useful than the current MPGe system. I might steal that concept. lol
"The 2025 Tesla Model 3…
Permalink
"The 2025 Tesla Model 3 starts at approximately $42,490, positioning it in the premium EV segment."
Uh, bullshit? That's budget EV no matter how you slice it. Look at the different Ioniq models, Polestar, or any luxury EV. You'll be in the $60 range very very easily.
Nice catch! Compared to…
Permalink
In reply to "The 2025 Tesla Model 3… by Tee El (not verified)
Nice catch! Compared to luxury EVs it's definitely more accessible.
Ok all good data BUT what if…
Permalink
Ok all good data BUT what if Tesla, now being sued for using algorithms to exaggerate odometer readings really is gaming the readings? So your cost data for 100 miles (reported 117% over actual) is really only 83 miles at the wheel? So all the Tesla data, range, etc is even worse?
Good catch! If that lawsuit…
Permalink
In reply to Ok all good data BUT what if… by Sparky (not verified)
Good catch! If that lawsuit holds up it could definitely shift the overall picture. Thanks for bringing it up!
The use value of the…
Permalink
The use value of the difference in price needs to be considered. Paper depreciation is hypothetical. The current mileage winner is the Kia Niro self-charging, coming in at 52 mpg and a warranty that's longer than average.
Yeah! Niro is pretty…
Permalink
In reply to The use value of the… by Dylan (not verified)
Yeah! Niro is pretty impressive. It's hard to argue with 52 mpg and that warranty tho.
Now redo it with $5.00 a…
Permalink
Now redo it with $5.00 a gallon gas.
Agree! Higher gas prices…
Permalink
In reply to Now redo it with $5.00 a… by Rangering (not verified)
Agree! Higher gas prices really tip the scales in favor of EVs when it comes to overall cost.
An EV would have to be a…
Permalink
An EV would have to be a hell of a lot more efficient than that for me to ever consider giving up my ICE land yacht for one.
Exactly! Everyone’s needs…
Permalink
In reply to An EV would have to be a… by G.G. (not verified)
Exactly! Everyone’s needs and preferences are different there’s room for all kinds of vehicles on the road.
So the Corrolla was driven…
Permalink
So the Corrolla was driven during what years? What are the costs adjusted to the present? The article mentions coupons for $30 oil changes (try $50). What are the current tax rates for a 2025 Corolla? The owner keeps meticulous spreadsheets but still not comparing apples to apples.
Totally agree! The costs…
Permalink
In reply to So the Corrolla was driven… by Jim (not verified)
Totally agree! The costs have shifted a lot over time and that definitely impacts comparisons. Appreciate you pointing that out.
I bought a used 2021 model 3…
Permalink
I bought a used 2021 model 3 sr+ in 12/2024 with 33500 miles. On a 700 mile road trip from Pensacola to Raleigh when I arrived in Raleigh my battery died and is getting replaced under warranty. Cost $54 in Tesla Supercharging. Tesla did not have a loaner for me so I rented a 2024 chevy Malibu (non hybrid)on the way home. The Malibu averaged well over 40 mpg. Gas cost me $45 for the 700 mile trip home. Now granted, my first fill up was Buc-ees and paid $2.51 per gallon. This was on 5/24/2025. So what does that tell us? It tells us that Tesla Supercharger electricity rates are more expensive than buying gas for the same sized car. If you live I an apartment and rely on Superchargers 100% of the time, you are way better off with a gas car.
Absolutely! charging access…
Permalink
In reply to I bought a used 2021 model 3… by Jim Creech (not verified)
Absolutely! charging access can really change the equation especially without home charging. Thanks for sharing your experience.
I'm confused. You state that…
Permalink
I'm confused. You state that you get 239 mi/kwh in your Tesla. That would be an absurdly high number. You would be getting thousands of miles out of a single charge if that were the case...
Great catch! Mixing up units…
Permalink
In reply to I'm confused. You state that… by Steven (not verified)
Great catch! Mixing up units would definitely skew the results. Appreciate you keeping me on track!
You forgot to account for…
Permalink
You forgot to account for the brains cells lost to ICE emissions. Those exhaust particulates are nasty! Also, do it over 150k miles to get a better picture. Or, 300k miles to really embarass the ICE.
Haha, totally! The longer…
Permalink
In reply to You forgot to account for… by Bernard (not verified)
Haha, totally! The longer you keep them the more EVs tend to make sense. Thanks for sharing your take.
Federal gas tax is not paid…
Permalink
Federal gas tax is not paid at the pump, but at the terminal by the distributor. Many state excise taxes are similarly collected, though some, like New Jersey do collect at the pump via the station. Those costs, like all business expenses (light bills, payroll, COGS, etc.) are passed along to the consumers of their goods and services. Including the incidental costs in the calculations is incorrect.
Great technical insight! You…
Permalink
In reply to Federal gas tax is not paid… by Mart H Shearer (not verified)
Great technical insight! You’re right taxes can be tricky with all the pass throughs involved. Appreciate the clarification!
what he hid is a fuel cost…
Permalink
what he hid is a fuel cost of 15 cents per mile at 3 miles per kwhr
means he is paying 45 cents per kwhr
obscenely expensive for electricity
the national average is 12 cents per kwhr
the guy lives in hawaii or the most expensive part of california
so his numbers do not apply to the other 48 states
and btw he is paying over $5 per gallon for gas, not $3, but he used the national average price for gasoline
this is a deliberate EV hit story
Good catch on the numbers!…
Permalink
In reply to what he hid is a fuel cost… by Bolt owner (not verified)
Good catch on the numbers! My rates aren’t quite that high either but regional differences definitely shake things up. Appreciate the honest feedback!
That $3/gallon price…
Permalink
That $3/gallon price includes a $3-$7 / gallon subsidy from the government (probably some of this applies to EVs as well) so though the milage calculations may be correct, the costs are not fully reflected in the numbers used here.
Great point! Those subsidies…
Permalink
In reply to That $3/gallon price… by James Christop… (not verified)
Great point! Those subsidies definitely add another twist to the overall cost story. Thanks for bringing it up!
Did you add in how much more…
Permalink
Did you add in how much more on your electric bill was from charging your car ??
Yes! I have a separate meter…
Permalink
In reply to Did you add in how much more… by TIMOTHY D STORER (not verified)
Yes! I have a separate meter that tracks exactly what the car uses.
Pagination