Are EVs truly a cost-saving revolution? Or are they just fancy gadgets with a hidden price tag?
One Reddit user, armed with spreadsheets, has taken it upon himself to track the cost per mile of his Tesla Model 3 and Chevy Bolt against his trusty, old-school Toyota Corolla.

The results are surprisingly counterintuitive, shattering some common EV myths and revealing a few hard truths about the cost of owning an electric car.
50,000-Mile Cost Breakdown of Tesla Model 3 vs. Chevy Bolt vs. Toyota Corolla
Erv, shared some insights and data on r/electricvehicles after driving 50,000 miles across a Tesla Model 3 and Chevy Bolt EUV. The kicker? His old Toyota Corolla still beats them both in one crucial metric.
"I have a separate meter for my 2023 Tesla Model 3 RWD that I use to track energy use, efficiency, cost (and cost-savings), etc., and compare back to very detailed data I kept on my previous ICE car.
Given I've now driven >30,000 miles, it felt like a good time to share the data, and because I had it, I also shared comparisons to the Bolt EUV.
*I benchmarked the fuel costs against my prior car, a Toyota Corolla, which got 33.17 mpg over the 100,000+ miles I tracked it, and I also benchmarked against current gas prices, which in my area have been roughly $3/gallon, but I am using nuanced monthly averages for my state. I also bake in a $30 oil change per 5,000 miles as "fuel".
**I also calculated the portion of my savings that is due to taxes I'm not paying at the pump (0.285+0.184 per gallon) - which is relevant politically given we can expect a $250/year EV surcharge to attempt to "close that loophole", which for me, looks to be "fair" if it were state + federal, but just being federal and combined with my state's surcharge ($75), it is not.
I have insurance, tabs, depreciation, maintenance, as well but wanted to focus on "fuel". Those costs are all higher than the Corolla due to the Tesla (and Bolt) being much newer cars (and fully insured instead of minimally insured), and the heightened costs do offset the fuel savings for now. I'll be curious to see over 100,000+ miles how the total cost to own tightens up and I expect the Tesla to win out.
Currently, depreciation/any cost of the vehicle, the Tesla is already winning at 15c/mile vs. the Corolla's 16c/mile due to the cheaper maintenance and fuel despite the higher insurance and tabs. But taking into account depreciation changes, that comparison to $0.34 vs. $0.20 in favor of the Corolla, for now. Which is a price I'm comfortable paying for enhanced safety, comfort, etc.
EFFICIENCY
Because it's always interesting to discuss - this is my "efficiency" based on the electricity I am actually paying for, so it includes losses (and I am adding in charging away from home, but that's been extremely minimal). The Tesla itself reports a different number: 239 Mi/kWh (vs 296), which is partially due to losses and partially due to the car not reporting preconditioning. Similarly, the Tesla app says 8,771 kWh charged vs. I have logged 9,028 (a 3% variance), which tells me the 20% variance on Mi/kWh is primarily preconditioning and not charging losses, which is surprising given I do not precondition very frequently and I do not use Sentry. I charge L2."
Tesla Model 3 vs. Chevy Bolt EUV: Performance, Range, and Space Comparison
- The Tesla Model 3 offers a dual-motor all-wheel-drive system producing 460 horsepower, achieving 0–60 mph in 2.9 seconds, with an EPA-estimated range of up to 342 miles. In contrast, the Chevrolet Bolt EUV features a single front-mounted motor delivering 200 horsepower, reaching 0–60 mph in approximately 7 seconds, and provides an EPA-estimated range of 247 miles.
- The Model 3, a compact sedan, offers 97 cubic feet of passenger volume and 24 cubic feet of cargo space. The Bolt EUV, a subcompact crossover, provides similar passenger volume at 97 cubic feet but offers slightly less cargo space at 16.3 cubic feet.
- Tesla's Model 3 includes a minimalist interior with a 15-inch touchscreen interface, advanced driver-assistance features, and access to Tesla's Supercharger network. The Bolt EUV comes equipped with Chevrolet's infotainment system, supports Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and offers GM's Super Cruise hands-free driving technology on compatible roads.
- The 2025 Tesla Model 3 starts at approximately $42,490, positioning it in the premium EV segment. The Chevrolet Bolt EUV offered a more affordable entry point, with prices starting around $27,800, making it one of the most budget-friendly electric vehicles available at the time of its release.
Erv, in the kind of methodical tone that could make an actuary swoon, detailed everything: kilowatt-hours, miles per gallon equivalent (MPGe), oil changes priced to the penny, and even the political nuances of gas taxes and EV surcharges.

According to his logs, the Model 3 RWD clocked in at 15 cents per mile in fuel and maintenance. The Bolt? Slightly worse. But even those figures paled next to his dearly departed Corolla, which, once depreciation was factored in, ran just 20 cents per mile overall. The Tesla ballooned to 34 cents. That’s not a minor difference.
Depreciation and Maintenance, How Reddit Users React to True EV Ownership Costs
The Reddit horde, predictably, pounced. One commenter, Hsaphoto, praised the inclusion of depreciation: the forgotten financial bogeyman. Another, neutralpoliticsbot, scoffed at the $30 oil change estimate with a sarcastic “$30 oil change where?”, the internet equivalent of flipping a table.

Erv held the line, citing years of discount coupons and standard oil. Welcome to Reddit, where every car becomes a case study and every assumption gets litigated like a class-action suit.
Beyond the Spreadsheet, User-Reported Efficiency and Cost Highlights from Bolt and Hybrid Owners
One Bolt owner, Low_Thanks_1540, bragged about getting 5.1 mi/kWh in Detroit, averaging just 3 cents per mile. Another user brought their Ford Maverick hybrid into the ring, reporting a paltry $0.129 per mile in operating costs. Suddenly, the Model 3's efficiency crown didn’t feel quite so regal.
The Tesla still wins where it matters to many, comfort, safety, and long-term efficiency. It delivered 114 MPGe versus the Bolt’s 103, despite colder temps and nearly 11,000 more miles logged. And with LFP batteries under the floorboards and a 239 mi/kWh efficiency reported by the car itself (after adjusting for preconditioning losses), the Model 3 proved not only cost-effective but technologically superior. As one user noted, “It’s well documented that the Tesla Model 3 RWD is more efficient than a Bolt with all things being equal.” The key phrase is that all things being equal, which in the real world, they rarely are.
MPGe Demystified, How EPA’s Miles-Per-Gallon-Equivalent Rating Works for EV Buyers
- MPGe is determined by equating the energy content of electricity to that of gasoline. Specifically, 33.7 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity is considered equivalent to one gallon of gasoline. To calculate MPGe, the distance an electric vehicle can travel on 33.7 kWh is measured, allowing for a comparison with traditional miles-per-gallon (MPG) ratings of gasoline vehicles.
- MPGe was introduced to provide consumers with a familiar metric to compare the energy efficiency of electric vehicles (EVs) to that of internal combustion engine vehicles. By translating electric energy consumption into a gasoline-equivalent format, it aims to simplify the decision-making process for potential EV buyers.
- While MPGe offers a standardized measure, it doesn't account for various real-world factors such as driving habits, terrain, climate conditions, and accessory usage (like air conditioning), all of which can significantly impact an EV's actual efficiency. Consequently, two vehicles with similar MPGe ratings might perform differently under everyday driving conditions.
- MPGe focuses solely on the energy consumed by the vehicle during operation, neglecting the efficiency and environmental impact of electricity generation and transmission. For instance, electricity produced from renewable sources has a different environmental footprint compared to that generated from fossil fuels, but MPGe does not differentiate between them.
Still, the most revealing part of this Reddit saga was the emotional math. Erv knows his Tesla costs more. He admits it. But he’s comfortable paying that premium for the intangible upgrades, refined ride, cleaner footprint, and the sense that he’s driving the future. That, right there, is the fine print most car reviews miss. We’re not always chasing the cheapest ride. Sometimes, we’re chasing the one that feels right. Even if it costs 14 cents more per mile.
Shifts in Car Ownership
So what does this all mean? It means the automotive world is no longer defined solely by horsepower and leather trim. It’s defined by kilowatt-hours, tax credits, and Reddit threads that dissect your every mile like a neurosurgeon studying a brain scan.
The EV revolution forces you to confront what you value, numbers or nuance, cost or conscience. And if you’re still wondering whether to switch, don’t just take it from the marketing brochures. Sit down with the math geniuses in the back booth of Reddit and let them show you what owning an EV actually costs.
Because in the end, the Tesla might feel like the future, the Bolt might get you there frugally, and the Corolla? That humble little gas-sipper might still be the most honest ride of all.
Have you done your own cost breakdown on EV ownership versus your previous ICE vehicles? What unexpected costs or savings did you encounter? Share your experiences with us in the comments!
Image Sources: Tesla Media Center, Chevy Newsroom, KBCustoms Facebook Page, Joseph L Young Sr. Facebook Page
Noah Washington is an automotive journalist based in Atlanta, Georgia. He enjoys covering the latest news in the automotive industry and conducting reviews on the latest cars. He has been in the automotive industry since 15 years old and has been featured in prominent automotive news sites. You can reach him on X and LinkedIn for tips and to follow his automotive coverage.

Comments
Appreciate it! It's great…
Permalink
In reply to yeah. Weird that he would… by gregn (not verified)
Appreciate it! It's great that you are able to cover your bases with all those details. That’s why I included all the numbers I could even if they won’t apply to everyone. Thanks man!
Yes, Japanese gas cars will…
Permalink
In reply to What he's not mentioning is… by Cody Williams (not verified)
Yes, Japanese gas cars will last for your life, but with EV cars, your battery will die soon or late.
You're right battery life…
Permalink
In reply to Yes, Japanese gas cars will… by Henry (not verified)
You're right battery life was a big worry early on. It's good to see they are lasting longer than expected and getting cheaper to replace too.
Including depreciation on a…
Permalink
In reply to What he's not mentioning is… by Cody Williams (not verified)
Including depreciation on a new car (tesla) vs a used car with historically very low deprecation (toyota corrola) as this guy doing the calculation did will almost always come out in favor of the Toyota. But he pure running costs easily beat out the gas car at $3 a gallon not too mention in many states is $4-5 a gallon which would dramatically beat out the gas car
Exactly. Old cars are less…
Permalink
In reply to What he's not mentioning is… by Cody Williams (not verified)
Exactly. Old cars are less costly than new ones, especially if you include purchase price. This is not news.
Exactly yes! When a car's…
Permalink
In reply to What he's not mentioning is… by Cody Williams (not verified)
Exactly yes! When a car's already 25 years old depreciation is basically zero. Fun to run all the numbers tho!
I was just going to mention…
Permalink
In reply to What he's not mentioning is… by Cody Williams (not verified)
I was just going to mention that!
Exactly! A 25 year old…
Permalink
In reply to What he's not mentioning is… by Cody Williams (not verified)
Exactly! A 25 year old corolla has completely different value loss patterns which really affects the cost. Thanks for pointing out that important detail.
What if you put a brand new…
Permalink
In reply to What he's not mentioning is… by Cody Williams (not verified)
What if you put a brand new Toyota Camry Hybrid against a model 3? Camry XSE (top trim level) starts under $35,000. That means the model 3 starts out $8k behind. All electric vehicles will be more expense to insure than a Camry. The Camry gets 51mpg. Google says the Camry will depreciate 33% after 5 years while the model 3 will depreciate 59% after 5 years. How many 100,000's of mileage will you have to drive to save the difference in cost? Just say you want the fancy tech stuff. The tesla vehicles will only depreciate more as Musk continues to devalue his own brand.
The gas car wins as long as…
Permalink
In reply to So In other words, it saved… by Thad m ncielly (not verified)
The gas car wins as long as the CO2 and climate damage is rated zero on your scale. Your car burns its weight in gasoline each year, and the damage done by those tons of CO2 is real.
That being said, I compliment Noah Washington on a well thought out comparison, and a clear explanation of the results.
They don't want to fix it,…
Permalink
In reply to The gas car wins as long as… by Nick Lappos (not verified)
They don't want to fix it, the government meddling doesnt always improve it as intended though. They could've easily comped corollas/civics tmrw, and 35+mpg. Electrics ironically is only 12% renewable so far- they could deregulate or hand out solar panels.. it'd be nice but unfortunately neither party has much interest in it.
Totally agree! there's no…
Permalink
In reply to They don't want to fix it,… by Aaron Jump (not verified)
Totally agree! there's no single silver bullet so why not push on multiple fronts? Solar incentives and better gas mileage can all be part of the mix.
"Damage done..." blah, blah,…
Permalink
In reply to The gas car wins as long as… by Nick Lappos (not verified)
"Damage done..." blah, blah, blah. He isn't even to the point where he's on the other side of the CO2 curve of production versus ICE yet and you're going to talk about "damage done" by the other car? 🤣 Never mind that I have yet to see any of the catastrophic predictions regarding CO2 or warming come true and I doubt that a person not driving any one vehicle has much of an effect.
Thanks for chiming in! Yeah,…
Permalink
In reply to "Damage done..." blah, blah,… by PhilSheo (not verified)
Thanks for chiming in! Yeah, I get why you'd be skeptical there's definitely a lot of back and forth on these topics. I was just putting my own experience out there in case it helps someone else figure out their approach. Good to have your voice in the mix!
What damage does CO2…
Permalink
In reply to The gas car wins as long as… by Nick Lappos (not verified)
What damage does CO2 emissions from a single car cause? Exactly what are you talking about? How many trees does it take to offset the CO2 from said vehicle? EVs are far heavier and caused far more discernible damage on actual roads that need actual money to fix them. The corolla is the best option by far.
Great points! The Corolla…
Permalink
In reply to What damage does CO2… by Hugh Jorgen (not verified)
Great points! The Corolla really is tough to beat and that's exactly why I included it. Thanks for reading!
Electricity doesn't come out…
Permalink
In reply to The gas car wins as long as… by Nick Lappos (not verified)
Electricity doesn't come out of thin air. You're just having the coal guys make electricity for you so you can drive your nonpolluting EV.
It actually does. Coal…
Permalink
In reply to Electricity doesn't come out… by Stevie (not verified)
It actually does. Coal plants are being shut down in favor wind power.
Exactly! The growth of…
Permalink
In reply to It actually does. Coal… by Raven (not verified)
Exactly! The growth of renewables is a positive trend. Thanks for adding that context.
Despite recent advances,…
Permalink
In reply to It actually does. Coal… by Raven (not verified)
Despite recent advances, many of the blades are still being buried in landfills. I wish it were as simple as making all new cars electric, and all energy green. No major country could make enough electricity in the next 10 years to power our automotive fleet if it were all electric. Many states still have to worry about rolling blackouts and brownout in the summer months.
Actually, I charge mine at…
Permalink
In reply to Electricity doesn't come out… by Stevie (not verified)
Actually, I charge mine at home at night when the rates are $0.07/kWh.
This also happens to be when energy (at least where I live) is "cleanest" (at least with regard to CO2) since that baseline is provided from a nuclear power plant. My state does burn coal, but that is primarily to supplement the energy needed during the day (and when the rates are higher).
That's awesome! Those off…
Permalink
In reply to Actually, I charge mine at… by Mikel Manitius (not verified)
That's awesome! Those off peak rates make a huge difference and nuclear baseload is definitely cleaner. Your setup sounds ideal for maximizing both cost and environmental benefits.
Wait till you hear about…
Permalink
In reply to Electricity doesn't come out… by Stevie (not verified)
Wait till you hear about solar and hydro generated energy
For sure! Solar and hydro…
Permalink
In reply to Wait till you hear about… by Mr BBQ (not verified)
For sure! Solar and hydro are real game changers. As the grid gets cleaner in many regions the benefits of EVs keep growing.
Fair point about grid…
Permalink
In reply to Electricity doesn't come out… by Stevie (not verified)
Fair point about grid sources and yes it definitely varies by region. I focused mainly on the cost data I could track accurately. Thanks for the perspective!
For sure! It all depends on…
Permalink
In reply to The gas car wins as long as… by Nick Lappos (not verified)
For sure! It all depends on what matters most to you. Everyone's situation is different.
When it comes to batteries,…
Permalink
In reply to So In other words, it saved… by Thad m ncielly (not verified)
When it comes to batteries, that's absolutely not true. You don't know how long one pack will last versus the other. And owing two of the exact same EV and driving/charging them the same way will still get you different battery life. That difference can be extremely significant
You’re absolutely right!…
Permalink
In reply to When it comes to batteries,… by Veganpotter (not verified)
You’re absolutely right! battery life can differ a lot from pack to pack and we’re still learning a ton about how they perform in real life. Appreciate you highlighting that!
Well he did say he had full…
Permalink
In reply to So In other words, it saved… by Thad m ncielly (not verified)
Well he did say he had full coverage insurance on the Tesla and only liability coverage on the Corolla. Also, the Corolla was fully depreciated vs the Tesla being new.
Also, Tesla batteries are serviceable. I have a friend with over 200k miles on his model s and had his battery serviced due to a dead cell. They replaced the cell and any degraded ones for $ 4,700 and the car drove like new. So you dead battery argument is not grounded in real world objective truth.
It sounds like you did not read the whole article. The headline is just clickbait.
Exactly! Thanks for actually…
Permalink
In reply to Well he did say he had full… by Chad (not verified)
Exactly! Thanks for actually reading the full breakdown. I tried to be transparent about the insurance differences and depreciation factors. That Model S example is great battery serviceability is definitely improving.
Pagination