Ed is a Cybertruck owner from Plymouth, Michigan, and says he’s frustrated with Tesla’s full self-driving software and how it penalizes users for seemingly random reasons.
The FSD functionality was automatically included as part of the additional $20,000 Ed paid to purchase a “Foundation Series” Cybertruck.
The elderly Cybertruck owner was recently put on a week-long suspension for what the software deemed improper use.
Getting barred from a functionality you’ve paid for is bad enough; however, Ed says the suspension couldn’t have come at a worse time.
At his age, Ed increasingly relies on FSD to maneuver a large vehicle like a Cybertruck. However, as he was in the middle of the FSD suspension, his 80-year-old wife fell down, and he had to drive her to the hospital.
This would have been the ideal time to get assistance from FSD; however, ED says, at this critical moment, he was unable to access the driver assist software.
Frustrated with the whole situation, Ed went on the Cybertruck Owners Club forum and shared his experience under the title “FSD JAIL RANT.”
Here is what he wrote…
“Bought our Cybertruck on 30 September 2024 and installed FSD as soon as it was available. FSD was recently put in JAIL for one week for the first time ever. I believe it was due to the “Apply Slight Force To The Steering Wheel” messages, me applying too much force to the steering wheel on numerous occasions, and FSD turning off.
Before FSD was put in jail and when the “Apply Slight Force To The Steering Wheel” message would appear, we would have to stop/park, and both get out of the Cybertruck and get back in to continue our trip with FSD.
This was quite annoying already. But turning off FSD for one week is insane. How about one day instead of a week if we have to be penalized at all? Just having FSD turned off until the next park/drive should be enough of a penalty.
While FSD was in jail this week, my 80-year-old wife fell, and I had to take her to the Hospital for X-ray/CT scans to be evaluated for injury. I couldn’t use FSD to drive us to the Hospital.
We are using and relying on FSD more than ever, and I did not appreciate the one-week in-jail penalty or the fact that I paid for LIFETIME FSD when we purchased a Foundation Series Cybertruck. Didn’t know that it came with one-week penalties.”
This is certainly a frustrating situation and, rather ironically, is the opposite of how Tesla and Elon Musk advertise the FSD software.
In the past, Elon Musk has highlighted several situations where a Tesla driver had a medical emergency while on Autopilot. The self-driving feature was able to either assist them to get to the hospital or pull them safely to the side of the road to stop further harm.
However, in this situation, the FSD software was unavailable because Tesla had decided to punish the owner with a 1-week suspension.
Looking at the comments, other Cybertruck owners say that the situation with Ed’s wife is irrelevant and that Tesla is in the right for handing down the 1-week suspension. They also add that using FSD is a privilege and not a right.
A Tesla owner from Montana writes…
“One week is so you can figure out and think. Hey, I might be using this incorrectly. Now is the time to figure out. Over time, the strikes will be removed, and you can start again.
Safety has to come first, or the senator from Massachusetts [Elizabeth Warren] comes for our FSD. Ed Markey will hold hearings and take my road trip fun away because of people who won't take the time. People already know how to drive. This is a privilege to be had. If one doesn't understand, they needs to learn how to use it correctly.
Sorry to hear about your wife. Yet not relevant in this case.”
Another Cybertruck owner, Dennis from Boyne City, Michigan, writes…
“Eyes on the road, proper use of FSD, and respect for the technology are recommended. I have been using FSD for years, as I paid for FSD even before it was released.
I have never had more than one or two strikes and feel that the current policy of FSD suspension is very, very generous, with little to no memory of past performance, and currently lacks restrictions for repeated issues with inattentive and demonstrated disregard for safety.”
Overall, the sentiment amongst other Cybertruck owners is that Ed deserves the 1-week ban. However, please let me know what you think in the comments. Share your ideas by clicking the red “Add new comment” button below. Also, visit our site, torquenews.com/Tesla, regularly for the latest updates.
Image: Screenshot from Patriotickenny TikTok video
For more information, check out: Tesla Cybertruck’s Giant “Giga Wiper” Blows Up Into Pieces While Driving in the Middle of a Snowstorm. Owner Forced into Dangerous Driving Situation With Barely Any Visibility Out the Windshield
Tinsae Aregay has been following Tesla and the evolution of the EV space daily for several years. He covers everything about Tesla, from the cars to Elon Musk, the energy business, and autonomy. Follow Tinsae on Twitter at @TinsaeAregay for daily Tesla news.
Comments
Uh. Shouldn't he just be…
Permalink
Uh. Shouldn't he just be happy that the bucket of bolts didn't turn into a brick as he was driving to the hospital?
Perhaps he should have…
Permalink
Perhaps he should have called an ambulance???? If you cannot operate a vehicle on your own without FSD engaged you should not be driving. FSD is not a replacement for being able to drive. Also getting 5 strikes is a sign you aren't doing it right. There is no blame here for anyone but the driver.
This is utterly BS. This man…
Permalink
This is utterly BS. This man needed his vehicle in an emergency and you are all allowing a multi billionaire to run your lives. You are all the weakest link.
Fake news. The pictures used…
Permalink
Fake news. The pictures used is of a video where this mans daughter rented the Cybertruck. At first he didn't like it but became in awe of the truck by the end.
The Cybertruck has been…
Permalink
The Cybertruck has been shown to be a useless and unreliable vehicle. Why people still buy this piece of junk is beyond me.
Next time, call an ambulance, or even a taxi if you don't want to drive by yourself. Don't rely on Elon's junk vehicle.
From his story, he does not…
Permalink
From his story, he does not know what he did wrong. Too much pressure disengages FSD, it does not ding you. Failure to look at the road after repeated warnings, failure to apply pressure on the steering wheel showing you are hands on, ding you. He would have the same problem in any Tesla.
They also add that using FSD…
Permalink
They also add that using FSD is a privilege and not a right.
You took my money, that makes it my right. Nobody looks at sagging jeans and says wearing those is a privilege not a right. You bought them they're yours to do with as you please.
In South Africa, when the…
Permalink
In South Africa, when the Musks thrived, the white Boors preferred to beat their black African Kaffirs with a whip called a "sjambok", a very hard leather made from hippo hide. It cuts.
Muck is just training Americans how to bow to his sjambok.
If the FSD were actually…
Permalink
If the FSD were actually ready for prime time, the FSD would navigate to a safe stopping place if it “felt” the driver was being irresponsible and perhaps suspend for a day at most.
For what they charge, the FSD product should be perfect, and clearly it is not.
This man should not drive at…
Permalink
This man should not drive at all. He is dangerous to everyone in the road and should not talk bad about Tesla. Elon and Trump are amazing and both will save everyone that supports them. Only demoncrats and people that love the same sex will not be saved. They don’t deserve the same rights as conservatives. We conservatives are white and always right. Non white people are NEVER truthful. Praise Jesus and praise Elon and Trump.
Read the whole article, but…
Permalink
Read the whole article, but I apparently missed where the FSD acronym was spelled out. Wonder what it means.
Eventually Ed will have the…
Permalink
Eventually Ed will have the FSD that he needs that is unsupervised, but we're not quite there yet. All FSD users should know the rules with respect to using FSD in it's current form. Break those rules and there have to be consequences. This was just an untimely accident for Ed's wife (hope she's doing well). Also, until the FSD software is capable of unsupervised driving, Ed is completely responsible for driving the Cybertruck and If he is not capable of driving it without the software, then he likely shouldn't be driving it at all. As for the "I paid for it so I should be able to use it" argument, using FSD like driving is a privilege so If one pays $100,000.00 for a vehicle and loses his or her license (for what ever reason), then should he or she still have the right to use the vehicle because they paid for it?
These comments sound like…
Permalink
These comments sound like they're coming directly from Elon Musk and not other drivers. How condescending and rude to chastise drivers, especially elderly drivers because you have to control every driver. You're nasty. The truck is a piece of work.
These comments sound like…
Permalink
These comments sound like they're coming directly from Elon Musk and not other drivers. How condescending and rude to chastise drivers, especially elderly drivers because you have to control every driver. You're nasty. The truck is a piece of work.
Pagination