Skip to main content

A Cybertruck Owner Claims Tesla is Punishing Him for Choosing to Drive His Truck Manually Instead of Relying On FSD – Adds, “I’m Getting Penalized For Enjoying Driving My Cybertruck”

A Tesla Cybertruck owner says he really enjoys driving his truck, but Tesla is penalizing him for choosing to drive manually instead of relying on Tesla’s FSD software. He adds that it’s unfair to be punished for simply enjoying driving his Cybertruck.
Posted:
Author: Tinsae Aregay
Advertising

Advertising

David, a Cybertruck owner from Virginia, says he loves driving his Cybertruck, but Tesla is punishing him for choosing to drive it manually instead of relying on the truck’s full self-driving software.

David has signed up for Tesla Insurance, which utilizes multiple real-time driving inputs to determine the monthly coverage cost for each Tesla Insurance customer.

Tesla primarily penalizes drivers for two habits: driving manually instead of using FSD software and driving at night.

Regrettably, David says he often enjoys driving at night, and when he’s out for a drive, he prefers to do the actual driving himself, finding it boring to just sit with his hands on his thighs.

Ironically, David is being penalized with a higher insurance premium because he loves his Cybertruck and enjoys driving it.

To continue driving his Cybertruck manually while still securing a good insurance premium, David is considering dropping his Tesla insurance coverage and switching to another provider.

However, if he goes ahead and changes insurance providers, David is worried that he might not receive the same integrated service he got when he was using Tesla Insurance.

The conflicted Cybertruck owner shared his story on the Cybertruck Owners Club forum.

He writes…

“Share Your Experience with Non-Tesla Insurance Claims

TLDR: I’m thinking about switching from Tesla Insurance because I’m unhappy with its driver score system, which penalizes my preferred driving styles like night driving and manual control over FSD.

I would like to hear from other Cybertruck owners about their experiences with non-Tesla insurers (e.g., Progressive, GEICO, USAA), especially regarding accident claims, OEM parts usage, and how easy it is to schedule repairs at Tesla centers compared to other repair shops.

Tesla insurance offers a more streamlined process after an accident. However, I’m curious about what others have experienced with non-Tesla providers such as Progressive, GEICO, and USAA.

I’m considering switching because of the driver profile and scoring system. I drive mostly at night and enjoy driving my truck—it seems like if you drive it, you enjoy it.

Keeping my score in the 90s is tough, and I’m not a bad driver. Since I paid for this vehicle, I want to drive it the way I like.

Advertising


I’d probably get the 10% discount if I enable FSD, but honestly, I mostly use active cruise control and enjoy keeping my hands on the wheel and steering. Sitting with my hands in my lap feels kind of boring. 

Have you filed a claim with these other companies? How did it go? I know there’s already a thread on quotes from other insurance companies, but I'd like to start a separate thread about actual accident claims involving the vehicle. 

Are they using OEM parts? Is it difficult to schedule an appointment at a Tesla repair center through these providers, or do you need to visit a different shop? 

I’m not sure if Tesla repair centers only serve Tesla insurance customers.”

David appreciates the vertical integration that comes with his insurance provider being the same as his vehicle manufacturer.

However, because David really enjoys driving his Cybertruck, he can’t use Tesla insurance.

This is definitely an unexpected paradox, but one thing David should keep in mind is that switching to another insurance provider, especially while driving a Cybertruck, might not be a good idea.

Last year, we broke the news that GEICO was terminating some Cybertruck insurance policies under the company’s personal vehicle category.

Tesla Cybertruck owners can still obtain coverage through GEICO’s commercial vehicle program, but this typically incurs higher costs.

Besides GEICO, several other insurance providers have also canceled policies specifically for the Cybertruck over the past few months.

Some mention the truck’s unusual design, others cite high repair costs, and some point to the truck’s low production numbers as reasons not to cover the Cybertruck.

Considering the unfavorable perception of the Cybertruck by insurance companies, David might find it wiser to stick with Tesla, even if it means paying a higher premium for driving manually.

However, please let me know what you think in the comments. Share your ideas by clicking the red “Add new comment” button below. Also, be sure to visit our site, torquenews.com/Tesla, regularly for the latest updates.

For more information, check out: A Brand-New Tesla Cybertruck Owner Says Everything on the Left Side of His Truck Stopped Working Less Than 24 Hours After He Bought it – Adds, “The Passenger Side Doors, Windows & Lights Don’t Work”

Tinsae Aregay has been following Tesla and the evolution of the EV space daily for several years. He covers everything about Tesla, from the cars to Elon Musk, the energy business, and autonomy. Follow Tinsae on Twitter at @TinsaeAregay for daily Tesla news.

Advertising

Comments

JT (not verified)    September 2, 2025 - 1:27PM

Viewing this as penalization ignores the very nature of usage-based insurance -- namely, premium is based on how the vehicle is driven. It has nothing to do with who the driver is or what their preferences are. You could just as easily state that Tesla insurance rewards Cybertruck owners who use FSD by lowering their premiums for taking advantage of convenient vehicle features, and have even written a whole article with that narrative. But in reality it's neither about reward nor penalty. It's about correctly pricing insurance risk based on how the vehicle is driven. Tesla has had to demonstrate to the state insurance regulator that lower premiums are appropriate when FSD is used by showing it is statistically correlated with lower accident frequency or severity. Conversely, when the risk is demonstrated to be higher, the vehicle premium must go up. The objectively unfair thing here would be for Tesla to have ignored this risk correlation and kept the higher premium even when FSD is enabled. Moreover, the fact that Tesla insurance has identified and demonstrated to regulators that premiums can vary based on the use of FSD means they've identified a simple way for the average driver to be objectively safer -- use FSD. What an easy thing to communicate to customers.


Advertising


Nicole Kaupa (not verified)    September 2, 2025 - 5:11PM

I'm sorry but I don't think he is being truthful about how he is driving. I have a model y with the tesla insurance and it's true that they track if you drive at night (between 11pm and 5am i think) but they also track how often you drive over 85mph, if you break hard, turn aggressively, if you drive without your seat belt, and if it forces you to disengage the autopilot feature. Mine says absolutely nothing about weather you use the fsd or not but I have found that using the cruise control does keep me from following too close to others. I dont think its too terribly difficult to keep the driving score above 90 but i also try not to drive that late at night. But I get it, im also thinking of switching to a different insurance company. Ill have to get quotes to see if it is worth it or not. Also I have a friend that also has a model y with progressive, he had to bring it to a tesla service center for it a few times and I don't think there were any issues.

Fred Fredburger (not verified)    September 3, 2025 - 9:19AM

Oh wow...imagine being penalized for..*checks notes* driving your car? Tesla is just stupid. FSD isn't reliable. There's a bunch of lawsuits related to it and a recent published fatality. I wouldn't trust FSD to drive me from charging station to charging station.