Skip to main content

2025 Chevy Silverado Duramax Owner Says His 3.0L Crapped-Out 5K In, and Is On National Back Order, He Adds, “Except My Payments Are Not On Back Order”

Buying a 2025 Chevy Silverado 3.0L Duramax should be a dream, but for one owner, it’s a $70,000 nightmare of back-ordered parts and engine failure. Is the "Baby Max" a lemon in disguise? Find out why this lifelong Chevy fan is walking away.
Posted:
Author: Denis Flierl

Advertising

Advertising

Imagine taking delivery of your first-ever brand-new 2025 Chevy Silverado Duramax at age 63, only to have the engine begin to self-destruct before its first real milestone. You’re told that disappearing coolant is "normal" while being handed jugs of antifreeze like a consolation prize, all while the dealership hides a growing oil consumption crisis.

This is the reality for one HVAC professional who found that while his $70,000 Chevrolet truck was on national back order for parts, his hefty monthly payments certainly weren't.

Patrick Schoeffler on the 2019 - 2026 Chevy Silverado & GMC Sierra Owners Facebook page says:

“Here is what it looks like when your new 2025 Chevy Silverado 3.0 Duramax craps and is on national back order, except your payments aren’t on back order.”

“My problems began at the 5,000-mile mark. We noticed the dealership was adding coolant. After the 3rd time, I pitched a bitch. That's when I found out it was a cooling line on the turbo, and it’s on national back order. The dealer said, ‘Here’s a gallon of antifreeze…keep her topped off.’ That was Jim Glover Chevrolet.”

“Then, the oil consumption started. By the 3rd oil change, we were burning over two quarts between oil changes. Glover told me that it was quite normal. I then asked about the blow-by. Pull the dipstick and blasts of blow by like an air gun. I then popped the oil filler cap, and it was pumping blow-by as I’ve never seen. They tell me it’s normal.”

“Then they wanted to perform an “oil consumption test”, meaning we pop in for a check between oil changes. I took it in because it was showing around a quart low.”

“They take it to the back, and a half hour later, it comes pulling up. They said it wasn’t low. Nothing wrong, except topping off the antifreeze and handing me another gallon, to keep her topped off. Before leaving, I checked the oil and VOLO! It was now magically overfilled!”

“I went back in, confronted the service writer about whether they added oil. He assured me they hadn’t. It was a bald-faced lie, and I called him out on it. I’ll NEVER do business with Glover again.”

“I then took the truck to Southpoint Chevy. They diagnosed the cooling line (on back order) and, with a borescope, found #2 cylinder is toast.”

“So. I’m waiting on a new engine, new turbo, and potentially a new CAT, presuming how much antifreeze has been through it.”

“Bottom line? First new vehicle I’ve ever purchased, and I’m 63. I could have paid off my home for what this $70,000 nightmare cost. I’ve been Chevy all my life. I went with the improved 3.0 Duramax for fuel mileage. Now, I hear the 2026 Silverado will be available with a 6.2 gas engine WITHOUT all that cylinder kill garbage that fails every time. Give me an LS that fires on all eight all the time, and you’ve got an easy 300,000-mile vehicle.”

“It wasn’t until I hired a lemon law attorney who served GM itself that wheels started turning. Not sure where we go from here. This truck was my state-to-state truck, and I’ve had to purchase a late-model used rig to perform my job. (HVAC Tech) They offered an economy car as a loaner. I almost took them up on it and removed the back glass so my ladder would fit.”

2025 Chevy Silverado Duramax

The 2025 Chevy Silverado 3.0L Duramax Reliability Crisis: 

As a senior reporter with three decades in the automotive industry, I have seen engines come and go, but the current state of the 2025 Chevy Silverado 3.0L Duramax reliability is deeply concerning. When a lifelong Chevrolet loyalist like Patrick Schoeffler spends $70,000 on his first-ever new vehicle, only to have it sit in a service bay with a "toasted" cylinder and a back-ordered turbo cooling line, it points to a systemic failure in quality control.

The 3.0L LZ0 Duramax was supposed to be the refined, efficient "Safe Haven" for truck buyers fleeing the well-documented lifter and bearing failures of the 6.2L V8. However, as I noted in my previous report, Escaping GM's 6.2L Nightmare: Is the 3.0L Duramax a Safe Haven or an Oil-Thirsty Trap?, many owners are finding that they may have simply traded one catastrophic engine defect for another.

The "Normal" Oil Consumption Myth

Patrick’s story highlights a growing trend I’ve investigated: dealerships dismissing significant oil loss as "normal." In the diesel world, a small amount of consumption can occur during break-in, but losing over two quarts between oil changes at the 5,000-mile mark is a red flag for internal mechanical failure. When a technician sees "blasts of blow-by" from the oil filler cap, that indicates combustion gases are leaking past the piston rings into the crankcase.

In another recent investigation, I Paid Cash For Two GMC Sierra Trucks, Both Failed: Owner Exposes GM's 3.0L Duramax Disaster, I detailed how TSB 25-NA-307 specifically addresses crankshaft end play and thrust bearing wear in the 2025 models. If those bearings fail, the engine internals are effectively shredded. This matches Patrick’s diagnosis of a ruined #2 cylinder.

Advertising


Dealing With the Dealership "Shell Game"

The most egregious part of Patrick’s experience wasn't just the mechanical failure but also the deceptive service practices. Attempting to hide oil consumption by overfilling the crankcase during a "test" violates the trust no customer should endure. For a professional HVAC tech whose livelihood depends on his rig, being offered an economy car as a loaner is insulting.

If you are currently experiencing 2025 Silverado 3.0 Duramax engine issues, you must document every interaction. Do not accept "it's normal" as an answer if your dipstick is showing significant loss. I’ve seen far too many cases where a truck sits for 60+ days. As I discussed in my article, I Had Nothing But Issue After Issue With My 2023 Chevy Silverado ZL1, so I Traded It For a 2025 ZR2, and 9K In, got a Check Engine Light For the Infamous DEF System.

2025 Chevy Silverado Duramax emblem on the hood

Key Takeaways for Owners

  • Monitor Your Fluids Daily: Do not wait for the dashboard light. Check your oil and coolant levels every 1,000 miles.
  • Document Everything: Keep a log of every gallon of antifreeze added and every quart of oil consumed.
  • The 30-Day Rule: Most state Lemon Laws trigger after 30 cumulative days out of service. Consult an attorney early if parts are on "national back order."
  • Force a Borescope Inspection: If you have excessive blow-by or unexplained coolant loss, demand that the dealer check the cylinders for scoring or damage.

What Silverado Owners Are Saying

The frustration is boiling over on platforms like Reddit, where owners share similar horror stories of early failures.

"My 2025 Silverado (5900 miles) left me stranded 3 weeks ago with a 'OIL PRESSURE LOW TURN VEHICLE OFF' warning. Took them 2 weeks to tell me I need a new engine, which is on back order." Reddit User No_Profession_4684

"Less than 5k miles when it goes into limp mode... they are telling me it needs a new engine (found metal in oil & filter). This is clearly a defective vehicle that cost me over $90k in March." Reddit User Enough-Dot-2080

"The dealer said the coolant control valve was on backorder. It could take anywhere from a week to a month. I'm a GM parts guy. That engine is hot garbage." Reddit User LowImprovement7823

Is There a Solution?

For those seeking solutions to the 2025 Chevy Silverado 3.0 Duramax engine failure, the unfortunate reality is that if the block is compromised, replacement is the only option. However, Patrick’s point about the 2026 model year is poignant. GM seems to be acknowledging that their complex cylinder-deactivation systems (DFM/AFM) and highly stressed small-displacement diesels are hitting a reliability wall. The return to a simpler 6.2L gas engine without "cylinder kill garbage" might be the admission of guilt many of us have been waiting for.

In The End

The 2025 Chevrolet Silverado 3.0L Duramax remains a great engine on paper, offering class-leading torque and fuel economy. However, a truck that cannot stay on the road is a liability, not an asset. Patrick Schoeffler's experience serves as a stark warning: the modern truck market is currently a "pick your poison" scenario between complex diesel emissions systems and fragile gasoline V8 internals. If you are a buyer, demand transparency from your dealer and never hesitate to involve a lemon law specialist if the "national back order" starts stretching into months.

What Would You Do?

Have you experienced excessive oil consumption or back-ordered parts with your 2025 Silverado or Sierra? Is GM losing your loyalty over these engine issues? Click the red link below to write your comment and join the community in sharing experiences.

Next Up: 2026 Silverado ZR1 Defects: A New Warning. If you thought the mechanical issues were limited to the Duramax, wait until you hear about the quality-control problems affecting the flagship 2026 models. I Just Bought a 2026 Chevy Silverado ZR1, and the Rear Bumper Is Crooked, making me Wonder What Else Is Wrong With It.

With over 30 years of industry experience, Denis Flierl brings an insider’s perspective to Torque News, where he has been a Senior Reporter since 2012. Before picking up the pen, Denis consulted for the automotive industry's biggest brands and honed his skills as a test driver. He cuts through the noise to deliver the latest auto news, compelling owner stories, and the expert analysis necessary to navigate today's changing automotive market.

Have a tip or question? Follow me on X @DenisFlierl and @WorldsCoolestRides, or connect with me on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn.

Photo credit: Denis Flierl

Set as google preferred source

Advertising

Comments

Should have paid off your…

No Pity (not verified)    December 27, 2025 - 6:29AM

Should have paid off your house and bought a used vehicle, that's the risks.

Regardless of the issue or…

Al (not verified)    December 27, 2025 - 11:37AM

Regardless of the issue or not . The fact that the story revolves around the BABY diesel 3.0 . The vehicle pictured in the header and again in the article is a Chevrolet HD which only comes with either a 6.6 gas or 6.6 Duramaxx diesel.
Relevance is super important and misinformation is just that.


Advertising


The 3.0 Duramax is highly…

Tim LeVan (not verified)    December 27, 2025 - 1:49PM

The 3.0 Duramax is highly marketed for its fuel economy, my personal experience with my 2020 was excellent fuel mileage, 29-30 mpg.
Once I learned the facts of this engine, mine was gone. The oil pump is belt drive, sure didn't want to rely on a belt in oil to keep the juices flowing. Also, the timing chain is on the backside of the engine. Pull the cab or engine to replace

It's the typical collision…

Spuwho (not verified)    December 27, 2025 - 2:23PM

It's the typical collision of fuel economy and pollution standards and the current market conditions.

People want capacity and towing in trucks, but makers still have to meet ever growing Federal standards.

It's not unique to the auto industry. Railroad issues with the new Tier 4 pollution standards on motive power. Amtrak issues with the new Siemens/Cummins Charger passenger engines.

In airplanes, problems with the Rolls Royce Trent 1000 on the A380 as it came out underpowered to maintain fuel economy. Then they became unreliable with compressor failures. The Pratt & Whitney GTF engines are now being replaced in the field with regularity. They were super economical, but unreliable. Airlines are starting to drop planes that use them now.

We are getting to the point where the regulatory and market standards are outstripping the ability of the makers to comply with them.

The recent rash of poor engine and transmission fabrication (Toyota), fuel pump failures (GM) in their diesels, Ford with ECU and transmission issues (Focus), clearly show that the gap is growing between the needed engineering and manufacturing and what the market is wanting

I'm done with Chevy and…

Jerry (not verified)    December 27, 2025 - 4:10PM

I'm done with Chevy and General Motors products myself. I had a 2012 Chevy Equinox that started eating oil. No puddles on the ground or smoke coming out of the exhaust, but I had to add a quart of oil per week. It finally died. I was broke, homeless, and owed about $6,000 on it. Repairing it would cost about what I owed on it. I emptied it out, pushed it across the street from the mechanic, and left a note and the keys inside. It finally got towed a week later. My credit took a big hit and I may never own a new vehicle, but if I do it won't be a GM, Ford, or Chrysler (Stellantis) ever again. I had a Ford (Mercury) back in 1980 and it was a major lemon. Nope, I will stick to a Japanese vehicle in the future. I used to be a loyal GM buyer, but no more. I have a 2016 Nissan Rogue that I bought used 6 years ago. All I have had to do is change the oil, replace the battery (twice as I only bought a 1 year battery at walmart), and get new tires. The Mercury lost its brakes, the tires bulged (no more Firestones), the alternator failed, and finally there was an issue with the catalytic converter that almost caused the fuel tank to explode! It spent about 6 weeks at the dealership waiting for parts. They finally customized the exhaust and I got it back. I traded it in the following morning and ended the ten month string of problems on a car that cost about as much as a Lincoln Town car. Ford stands for Found On Road Dead!

We all should listen to…

Ray (not verified)    December 28, 2025 - 5:50AM

We all should listen to Scotty. Rev up engines!

$70k is too much for any car…

Cid Newman (not verified)    December 28, 2025 - 8:52AM

$70k is too much for any car, period.

The cylinder deactivation is…

Steve (not verified)    December 28, 2025 - 1:52PM

The cylinder deactivation is not what is the root problem in the 6.2. It was the issue in the previous 5.3. Thin oil used to reduce friction and increase mpg without properly machined cranks is the current 6.2 issue.

I have a 2023 3.0L with 75K. Had a rear seal leak early that the dealer fixed and also the coolant valve failure which they fixed (GM has since identified the valve issue and increased the warranty on that part to 150k miles). The engine/transmission combo is the best half ton I have ever driven and one of the smoothest vehicles I have ever driven. I have pulled a 8k trailer for over 15k miles. Its a joy compared to towing with the 5.3. If it makes it to 200k miles it will be the best truck I have ever owned but I have my doubts. I also feel it would not be an issue if it didn't have to use DEF and have an EGR valve. I use a lubricity additive to try to protect the fuel pump which is an issue for all diesels with the low sulfur diesel fuel.

Imo all these engine issues is previously bullet proof motors is because of the silly mpg rules. Toyota is also currently replacing thousands of motors im their trucks also. How green is having to make replacement engines and trucks?

If you have to open the hood…

gavron (not verified)    December 28, 2025 - 2:31PM

If you have to open the hood every 1000 miles it's not you that's the problem.

Take it back to GM. Their problem.

General motors has a program…

James Dudley (not verified)    December 29, 2025 - 7:29PM

General motors has a program in which if your vehicle is in for warranty repair over I believe 30 days that you are able to submit and be reimbursed for any payments you have to make on that vehicle during the time it is down. Your service advisor or service manager should know this program and how to submit it otherwise contact general motors and they should be able to assist. I know this doesn't help with the issue of not having a vehicle that you're paying on and/or the insurance and everything else.

This is why I bought a new…

Stephen Jackson (not verified)    December 29, 2025 - 10:35PM

This is why I bought a new 25 Frontier SV 4x4 pickup. No fancy flashy turbo engine that blows up. Still too much electronic BS but less than others. It's solidly reliable.

I have always been a "Chevy…

Dave Puterbaugh (not verified)    December 30, 2025 - 10:33PM

I have always been a "Chevy guy", but no more. I have a properly serviced 2018 Silverado 1500 with the 6.2 engine. Bent pushrod at 80k miles, then a broken pushrod at 93k miles. Cost $5k for the first repair, $13k for the second repair which was an engine replacement. I love a lot about my truck, but GM engineering should be ashamed of how the variable displacement fails. They cannot afford to do this with their truck lineup, whether gas or diesel powered.

Took my new RST Z71 in for…

Eric Christiansen (not verified)    January 22, 2026 - 1:00PM

Took my new RST Z71 in for its first oil change at 5,000 miles. The next day on the way to work, it had a horrible, RPM dependent knocking noise. Was told to bring it back after talking with them. The lead service tech knew exactly what it was just from listening and confirmed axial crankshaft play visually. I was blindsided when he said I need a new engine. This was just before Thanksgiving 2025. I still don't have my truck back.