Skip to main content

I Took My Chevy Silverado ZR2 In for the Engine Recall, But It’s a Joke That GM Thinks Thicker Oil Will Fix the Real Problem

When a recall ends with an oil change and no answers, some Chevy Silverado owners are starting to wonder if the real fix is just a way to buy time.
Posted:
Author: Aram Krajekian
Advertising

Advertising

Some expect a recall fix to mean something, like maybe a new part or something that shows the automaker is taking the issue seriously. But sometimes, what you're handed instead feels like a shortcut designed to buy time. That was the impression I got while scrolling through the "Chevrolet Silverado ZR2" Facebook group earlier this evening, where I came across a post from Spencer Wright. He had just taken his Chevy Silverado ZR2 in for the now well-known engine recall that’s been making waves among GM truck owners. What he got in return was far from the kind of fix most would have imagined.

Here's his story: “Just had my engine 'recall' done at the stealership. Apparently my engine is fine and they switched the oil to 0W-40. They said nothing about an extended warranty or anything even when I asked. Currently waiting to talk to a service manager. It's a joke that they think upping the oil viscosity will fix the said issue with the crank/bearings. That's like saying my lawnmower engine has a knock so I put thicker oil in it to make it last a bit longer. Also with having 50,000km on the truck already, I would think the damage has already been done considering the fact that apparently I've been running the wrong oil since day one new off the lot. Anyone else in Canada have this issue or did you get some type of extended warranty?”

Other Silverado Owners Are Feeling the Same Way

Spencer’s post immediately resonated with other Silverado owners, especially those who felt similarly underwhelmed by the so-called "fix." The engine recall he's referring to is part of a growing list of concerns GM truck owners have been raising over the last year. These are issues that span from major drivetrain failures to software glitches. And while this one focuses on internal engine wear, the response by dealerships appears to be uniform: swap the engine oil for a thicker 0W-40, call it good, and send the customer back on the road.

One commenter, Craig Thompson, offered a bit of clarity and reminder that GM might not be as hands-off with their support as some dealers make it seem. “Your recall letter should state the extended warranty! 10 years from the date the vehicle was originally placed in service or 150k miles. Whichever comes first! Better than the 5 year 60k you get buying new!” It’s a solid point, but it only raises more questions for those who say their service advisors never even brought it up.

Chevy ZR2 badge on gray leather interior with circular air vent, highlighting performance trim detail

That same lack of communication and inconsistency seems to be at the heart of this story. For example, JJ Hernandez chimed in with a sarcastic but telling response: “Just hook up an enclosed trailer and let the engine blow up. That’s what I did.” While he may be joking, the underlying frustration is clear that some owners feel like GM is waiting for engines to fail before actually offering real support.

Luke Bergey, however, stepped in with some nuance: “Unfortunately the ‘stealership’ is following the protocol and marching orders put in place by GM. They would much rather get the recall/warranty work of replacing motors all day than changing oil. The dealerships themselves don’t decide the plan of action on the remedies to any recalls. Almost every dealer employee knows this isn’t the resolution to the problem but the remedy is provided by GM and they can’t just go cowboy and start pulling motors at the dealerships without approval.”

Luke’s comment adds an important layer to this conversation. It highlights that the real decision-making power rests not with the dealership but with GM itself. And if corporate strategy says the issue can be "handled" with thicker oil, then that’s what dealers are stuck doing, even when they know better.

More Signs That Trust in GM Is Cracking

In fact, these kinds of corporate-dealer disconnects are becoming more visible across the ownership experience. Take a look at what happened to this Silverado owner who brought their 6.2L Silverado in for the recall and was told there was nothing the dealer could do. That story alone reveals just how much frustration is building, especially among buyers who spent $70,000 or more expecting durability and not deflection from GM when facing these issues.

Other owners like N-Munro Bruyere have already made up their minds. “Been a Chevy and GM guy for 20 years. Glad I switched when I bought a new truck.” 

Advertising


Short, blunt, but a sentiment that stings. When long-time loyalists start walking away, that’s a problem.

And sadly, these stories don’t exist in a vacuum. More and more Silverado owners are coming forward with reports of breakdowns in the middle of the road, electrical issues, or drivetrain concerns. Many are also pointing out how difficult it is to get consistent support when something goes wrong even if it’s under warranty. There’s a growing feeling that while GM might be quick to put out a recall, they’re a little slower to put forward a solution that genuinely restores confidence.

This Pattern Is Becoming Too Familiar

This is why I find this situation incredibly telling of a larger shift we’re witnessing in the truck market. Today’s buyers are more informed than ever, and they’re not afraid to call out what feels like a stopgap measure disguised as a fix. It used to be that recalls led to part swaps or engineering changes, but lately we’re seeing a lot more software updates, sensor reprogramming, or in this case, an oil change and a pat on the back. That doesn’t inspire trust. I think what frustrates many Silverado ZR2 owners is that they believed they were buying one of the most capable and well-engineered trucks GM has ever made, and not something that needs a viscosity band-aid to make it through warranty.

In the context of this broader trend, stories like this one about a 2024 Silverado 1500 LT owner who shared multiple complaints over drivetrain and infotainment glitches start to feel less like exceptions and more like warnings. If this pattern continues, GM risks turning decades of brand loyalty into widespread buyer fatigue.

One thing is for sure: the public is watching, and with online communities giving owners a real-time platform to compare notes, these frustrations don’t fade away quietly. They echo and grow.

Key Takeaways

  • Don’t assume the recall fix means a full mechanical repair. If you received the engine recall notice, ask the dealership exactly what is being done, what parts (if any) are replaced, and whether you're getting an extended warranty. Insist on documentation too.
  • Request a copy of the extended warranty terms. As Craig Thompson pointed out, you may be eligible for up to 10 years or 150,000 miles of protection.
  • Dealers are bound by GM's instructions. As frustrating as it is, it’s important to remember that service advisors often can’t go beyond GM’s set recall procedures. Blame might be better directed higher up the chain.
  • Don't wait for failure to take action. If you hear or feel something is off, push for an analysis or further inspection before a small issue becomes a big problem. Documentation now can protect you later.
  • Longtime loyalty is being tested. Even buyers who’ve owned dozens of Chevrolets are saying they’re rethinking things. As seen in this story of a 40-year GM loyalist losing trust, the stakes go beyond just one recall.

Your Turn to Share

What are your thoughts on GM and the recent problems regarding their trucks? Are they doing enough regarding this recall?

And if you own one, have you taken your truck in for this engine recall? What kind of service did you receive?

Don't hesitate to jump into the comments and share your experience. Your feedback might be exactly what another owner needs to hear.

Aram Krajekian is a young automotive journalist bringing a fresh perspective to his coverage of the evolving automotive landscape. Follow Aram on X and LinkedIn for daily news coverage about cars.

Image Sources: The “Chevrolet Silverado ZR2” public Facebook group and Chevrolet’s gallery, respectively.

Advertising

Comments

Bob (not verified)    July 3, 2025 - 9:42PM

You should have watched " the oil geek" tube post when you researched you article. He gives a scientific explanation as to why the change to 0W 40 will work to solve the problem permanent solution instead of listening to disgruntled truck owners.


Advertising


Scott (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 9:28AM

In reply to by Bob (not verified)

Permanent solution according to a YouTube channel? That's laughable, especially considering the problems GM has had for more than a couple years with their engines. They swept the 5.3 issues under the rug and there was even internal communications that proved they did.

Rem Alavard (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 10:09AM

In reply to by Bob (not verified)

I don't think a YouTuber's comments are hard, undeniable fact. Anybody can say anything on the internet and make it sound believable. Only time will tell, the fact that GM didn't specify a heavier oil to begin with is reason enough to dispute that.

Joe D (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 12:17PM

In reply to by Bob (not verified)

The oil geek is in my opinion and opinion based response and who is to say he is not a paid shill for GM. So to add a thicker oil on a poorly machined part is a fix, yeah, that makes sense. What next, add 90 weight gear oil to the crankcase so the engine lasts forever. I've been a GM fan boy for 40 plus years, but after spending $90,000 on an unreliable truck I'm jumping ship...

Steve (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 1:12PM

In reply to by Bob (not verified)

The above poster isnt wrong. The oil change absolutely will fix the issue. One only needs to look at every other 6.2 in GMs lineup. Mecahnically identical but in cars they use a different oil with zero issies. Thinner oil in the trucks to get the MPGs up created this mess.

Still dobt believe the wroting on the wall, then go buy a ford.

z0 (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 4:34PM

In reply to by Bob (not verified)

Of course it's not a proper fix, it's just a way to band-aid it until the catastrophic failure takes place OUTSIDE of your warranty period.

It's like saying that when I decided to run thicker oil in my old Toyota to stop it from consuming a quart a week that it was a proper fix.

Ski (not verified)    July 8, 2025 - 1:29PM

In reply to by Bob (not verified)

The recall starts with taking an oscilloscope reading of the internal engine 'noise'. That reading is then compared via software,to to a known good baseline sample. If the amplitude of the 'noise' is within that spec, the engine passes, meaning an internal knock was not detected.

The change in oil viscosity has been covered clearly and repeatedly, so I'm not beating that dead horse. The people spouting off about it clearly don't understand the complete relationship between viscosity, bearing protection and manipulation of the viscosity over the last decade or so by ALL manufacturers to meet EPA fuel economy requirements.

Dana Awtry (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 7:51AM

I've had nothing but the run around from the dealership where I bought my new chevy that came with the rocky ridge package. I spent over 100k on my truck and had it three months before the front end started rattling. They had also promised to install an inverter making the plug in the bed of the truck actually useful. Three weeks out was the next available appointment just to have my truck looked at and to have the inverter installed. Finally I leave it there for a whole day and they call me to say they need it another day. I'm self employed and use need my truck every day. I reluctantly said yes and then an hour later they call me back to tell me they decided they weren't going yo honor what they promised with the exscuse it will be a fire Hazzard. This was the third time they had promised to install it. The other times they claimed to have bought the wrong inverter and parts. My truck now is still without the repairs ot needs because the dealership in return has only offered me two free oil changes. It's all such BS.

Bob Raynor (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 7:55AM

Look I Hear You And Your Right. What Happened To GM. Back In The Day Tgey Were Tops. But Since They Got More Complicated Engines New , They Have Gone Bad. No Tge Thicker Oil Mot Going To Gelp Tge Damage Fone On The Assembly Line. I Sold My Chevy Silverado And Bought A Dodge. Much Happier.

Steve (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 7:58AM

Is it poor engine design or increasingly impossible regulation compliance that is driving these issues?

Any serious issues with the 5.3 prior to AFM(cylinder deactivation)? Any issues in the Corvettes or the Camaro's with the 6.2? Why do people actively seek out old diesel trucks?

Is it better for the environment to throw out these trucks with marginally better fuel economy and have to replace them 2x as often because they dont last or aren't reliable?

How "green" is an electric car?

Kevin S (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 9:57AM

Im A Ford specialty repair shop..Putting heavier weight oil in a motor is usually only something you try once a FORD hits 400k miles and your trying to make it last a bit longer..At least that's what I'll try at my shop...As bearings wear in the engine the tolerances become larger and oil psi drops.. The thicker oil helps to bump the oil psi up some to get more miles out of the engine...
If I was to buy a vehicle with one of these engines in it and plan to keep it a long time I'd recommend to buy from a dealer with a lifetime powertrain warranty... People will say that warranty is worthless, (those that say that are the dealers that don't offer a lifetime powertrain warranty) but they pay us at our shop really well, and are easy to work with.

Rem Alavard (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 10:06AM

I was a GM guy my whole life. But after driving their new models, I must admit that they have lost their way. It's not just isolated to GM, every brand is producing low quality vehicles and pricing them higher than ever. I welcome the Chinese at this point, there is no way I will stay loyal to any brand that shamelessly provides an inferior product at an inflated price.

Ron Bolton (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 10:35AM

You were not using the wrong oil. The higher viscosity oil is a bandaid. The lower viscosity oil has better penetrating ability and a different additive package. Not a replacement for inferior parts.

M. George (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 10:36AM

I just sold my 2023 GMC SLT with 8500 miles. Loved the truck but was afraid to drive it on any trip of distance. Was able to sell it to individual who worked for GM for years and was very loyal to GM. I took a minimum loss on it so I didn’t have to go through the recall aggravation. Have always bought GM for 50 years. Probably never buy GM again. I have purchased a Tacoma pickup and will see how that goes.
Good luck to all the Recall customers. I hope it goes well for you. Really love the looks of the trucks but can’t pay these prices and have to worry about the reliability issues.

Tom Watson (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 11:28AM

I have owned chevrolet pickups for years, BUT I AM DONE WITH CHEVROLET NOW, NO MORE, everything they build anymore is JUNK, recall after recall, bad motors, bad transmissions, bad electronics, they don't care about nothing but YOUR MONEY!!!! GET RID OF THEM,,,,,,,,,,,

Scott Gongaware (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 11:35AM

My $95K GMC Sierra is part of the recall. This follows the ownership of 4 GM trucks and over 700,000 miles.

I am beyond belief with how this is being handled. Shame of GM for NOT agreeing to replace every single engine with internal parts that are not within specifications. Im retired and bought what I thought would be the truck of my life. Now im afraid to tow my boat, go to remote areas that I enjoy or even take the wife on a vacation.

How do I get involved with the lawsuits or with any other activity to force GM to do the right thing? Certainly, they are off the list for any further vehicles if they dont respond accordingly.

Steve Long (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 11:44AM

I don't own a GM nor would I buy one as I already DO NOT Trust GM. The way they are treating customers with this latest recall on the Silverado ZR2 with a dumb change of viscosity of oil just further erodes the lack of trust I currently have. They are clearly putting short term costs above long term loyalty of their customers. There's a very clear statement there to me and that is, "do not trust us to take care of you even under warranty because we will try to get you past the warranty period and push the real costs back onto you, our customers."

Robert Pruitt (not verified)    July 10, 2025 - 4:36PM

In reply to by Steve Long (not verified)

But the main problem to begin with was the fact that they were dumb enough to change the oil viscosity to start with.

The reason the cars with the same engine don't have any issues is specifically because the cars had the thicker oil in it from the factory.....

They dropped the viscosity in the trucks to boost milage.....
Sooooo, obviously if your engine hasn't taken much, or any damage from the thinner oil, the fix would be to put the correct oil back in. 🤷‍♂️

Although GM, Ford, and Dodge are all producing crap, this fix is the correct way to fix this particular problem. This has always been a problem of the oil being so thin that it didn't keep the parts from making contact.

For the 2022 model year, GM has 13 recalls, while Dodge has 16 and Ford has 17.

Robert Pruitt (not verified)    July 10, 2025 - 4:36PM

In reply to by Steve Long (not verified)

But the main problem to begin with was the fact that they were dumb enough to change the oil viscosity to start with.

The reason the cars with the same engine don't have any issues is specifically because the cars had the thicker oil in it from the factory.....

They dropped the viscosity in the trucks to boost milage.....
Sooooo, obviously if your engine hasn't taken much, or any damage from the thinner oil, the fix would be to put the correct oil back in. 🤷‍♂️

Although GM, Ford, and Dodge are all producing crap, this fix is the correct way to fix this particular problem. This has always been a problem of the oil being so thin that it didn't keep the parts from making contact.

For the 2022 model year, GM has 13 recalls, while Dodge has 16 and Ford has 17.

HarleyRich (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 12:45PM

My thoughts are>>> GM doesn't really care if they lose a few/several diehard GM fans. The bottom line is not the customer but the shareholder nowadays, and possibly upper management's bonus's!!!!!!

Mike (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 12:51PM

I was a GM guy for years, then i got a Denali truck and put an additional 20k for transmission, ac, suspension etc....traded it in for a Ram Limited and will never go back

James M Norris (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 1:27PM

I have drove and bought all 4 major brands since 1986. Some were new, all break. Ram the worst. Ford and Chevy the same.Toyota broke with in a year. Back to Chevy again 2025 1500 OK so far

Mike (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 1:46PM

As soon as I heard the whispers in the wind, well before Chevy issued the recall, I traded in my 2022 6.2L ZR2 for a 2025 with the 5.3L. I have been a loyal Chevy customer for almost 40 years, but when I read that they didn't have a "fix" yet and 600,000 trucks were being recalled I traded it in it was still worth top dollar. I've had 5 other Chevy trucks with the 5.3 motor with zero issues whatsoever. It cost me $12k to upgrade from the 22 to the 25, and I think I made out pretty good since I got the jump before the recall. I hope that they figure something out better than an oil change. I really liked my 6.2 gas mileage,
but that was supposed to be my retirement truck.

CB in Texas (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 1:49PM

I took my 2024 HC in for the recall. Mine "passed" as well. They changed the oil to the 40 weight. In my Chevrolet app, it shows the warranty extension. Am I convinced that my truck is good? No I am not.

James (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 2:41PM

I'm happy to say I'm not a Silverado owner but my brother is. He traded in his 2015 Silverado that was clicking and running rough and ready to die. He bought another Silverado with this horrible 6.2 liter engine thinking he upgraded. I thought so too but now all the recalls for multiple major problems while GM is trying everything they can to get out of paying for their issues. I'm glad I don't own a Silverado but can tell you here and now, I never will and my Brother never will again. That new KIA pickup is looking better all the time.
For all you folks trying hard to remain loyal to GM, get ready to be ripped off again.

Charles Cavanaugh (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 3:08PM

Took my recall letter to my Maryland dealer. The letter states that parts aren’t available yet. Come back when the next letter arrives stating parts are now available. Wonder if this will be before or after my 6.2 liter blows up.

Larry Sneary (not verified)    July 5, 2025 - 3:18PM

Why buy GM in the first place, people need to be informed by reading trade journals, and talking to other car owners and mechanics. GM has been known by most informed consumers of their engine and transmission problems for a long time, now they don't stand by their product. Maybe the tax payer will bail them out, like stellantis in 2009.