Follow us today...
A $30,000 repair estimate has a way of stopping any owner cold, especially when it arrives attached to a vehicle barely broken in. That is the situation one 2023 Mustang Mach-E owner says he is facing after what he describes as a minor road hazard led to total coolant loss, a disabled vehicle, and a 180-mile tow across Northern California.
The post, shared in a Mustang Mach-E owners group, has quickly become a flashpoint for a larger debate about EV durability, underbody protection, and where design responsibility ends and insurance begins.
According to the owner, the incident began with what appeared to be a small rock strike. The damage was entirely underneath the car, leaving a gash in the underlayment that allowed coolant to escape. Shortly afterward, the Mach-E displayed a “park safely now” warning and shut down completely in the owner’s driveway. With no ability to limp the car to a nearby service center, the vehicle was towed roughly 180 miles from Tahoe to Walnut Creek, an inconvenience that already stretches patience before a repair estimate ever enters the picture.
“My Mustang Mach E 2023 hit a road hazard. Was probably a small rock since all the damage is under the car. Small gash in the underlayment that caused a loss of coolant. Got a park safely now message, and the car went dead in my driveway. Had to go 180 miles to the dealer from Tahoe to Walnut Creek, California.
The estimated repair cost is $30K. This is clearly a design flaw. The car should be more robust to road hazards. Ford should either recall the car or extend the warranty to cover such a loss. My car has only 12K miles on it. If customers complain or insurance companies refuse to insure this car, Ford sales will drop, and they will listen.
Please share with any potential buyers. I will never recommend the Mach E to anyone. The picture below shows the damage. If repairing that cost $30 K, the car was poorly designed. I intend to pursue this with the National Transportation Safety Regulators.”
The estimate did enter the picture, and it landed hard. Roughly $30,000 to repair a car with just 12,000 miles. At that point, frustration turned into accusation. The owner called the situation a design flaw, arguing that a modern vehicle, especially one marketed for everyday use, should be robust enough to withstand common road debris without suffering catastrophic damage. In his view, either the car should be redesigned, recalled, or covered under an extended warranty to account for this type of failure.
Ford Mustang Mach-E: Interior Design & More
- The Mach-E’s crossover proportions allow for a higher seating position and improved cargo access compared with traditional coupes, broadening its everyday usability.
- Electric torque provides immediate acceleration, though drive modes significantly alter throttle sensitivity and steering weight, changing how the vehicle feels in routine driving.
- The cabin relies heavily on a large central touchscreen, streamlining the dashboard while increasing dependence on software menus for basic adjustments.
- Chassis tuning balances comfort with control, delivering a settled highway ride while revealing firmness over sharp impacts and uneven pavement.
That framing immediately drew pushback from other owners. Several pointed out that warranty coverage has never applied to impact damage, regardless of drivetrain. A punctured oil pan on an internal combustion vehicle would not be covered either. This, they argued, is precisely why comprehensive insurance exists. From that perspective, the Mach-E is not uniquely flawed, but rather subject to the same rules that have governed cars for decades.
Others questioned the characterization of the incident itself. One commenter noted visible dents and a puncture significant enough to penetrate metal, suggesting the impact may have been more severe than a “small rock.” Another cut straight to the practical outcome, suggesting the owner involve insurance and consider totaling the vehicle if the battery pack itself was compromised. At that level of damage, the financial logic often overtakes the emotional one.
Still, the underlying concern resonates. EVs package expensive, mission-critical components low in the chassis. Coolant lines, battery enclosures, and thermal management systems live closer to the road than fuel tanks and exhaust systems once did. When those systems are breached, the consequences escalate quickly. A leak that would be inconvenient in a gas car can be existential in an EV, triggering shutdown protocols designed to protect high-voltage components at all costs.
This is where the debate becomes less about blame and more about expectations. The Mach-E owner argues that if an EV can be immobilized and economically crippled by road debris common to public highways, then the design margin is too thin. Critics counter that no vehicle can be designed to shrug off every impact without unacceptable weight, cost, or efficiency penalties. Somewhere between those positions lies the uncomfortable reality of modern automotive engineering.
There is also the matter of optics. A $30,000 estimate on a relatively new vehicle is the kind of number that travels far beyond a single Facebook group. Whether or not insurance ultimately absorbs the cost, stories like this shape perception. They influence potential buyers who may not distinguish between warranty exclusions, insurance coverage, and engineering tradeoffs. To them, it simply looks like fragility.
The owner has stated an intention to pursue the matter with national transportation safety regulators and to warn potential buyers. Whether that effort gains traction remains to be seen. Regulatory action typically follows patterns, not isolated cases, and manufacturers tend to respond only when failures show consistency across a fleet.
What this episode undeniably highlights is the evolving nature of automotive risk. EVs trade mechanical complexity for electrical and thermal complexity. They are quieter, simpler in some respects, but less forgiving in others. When something goes wrong underneath, it can go very wrong very quickly.
For current and prospective Mach-E owners, the takeaway is not necessarily fear, but clarity. Understand what your warranty covers. Understand what your insurance covers. And understand that the economics of EV repair are still catching up to the realities of mass adoption. A small impact may still be a big problem, not because the car is uniquely defective, but because the stakes under the floor are higher than they used to be.
Image Sources: Ford Media Center
Noah Washington is an automotive journalist based in Atlanta, Georgia. He enjoys covering the latest news in the automotive industry and conducting reviews on the latest cars. He has been in the automotive industry since 15 years old and has been featured in prominent automotive news sites. You can reach him on X and LinkedIn for tips and to follow his automotive coverage.
Set Torque News as Preferred Source on Google
Follow us today...
Comments
Answer is simple stop buying…
Permalink
Answer is simple stop buying EVs. Especially if you live in the boondocks. Its not rocket science.
Auto insurance?
Permalink
Auto insurance?
Had a similar issue with the…
Permalink
Had a similar issue with the same year Mach E. In my case, rodents aye through the coolant hoses and electrical insulation, rendering all the sensors unworkable. Repair estimate of about $6K covered by comprehensive insurance, less deductible. One part was on back order so the car was at the dealership for about 5 months. Never thought the problem was Ford's fault. Got rid of the car long before lease end at considerable cost, because the car was just too buggy. Life is too short to drive annoying cars!
The gap in his story is…
Permalink
The gap in his story is getting the “park safely now” message and when it “quits” in his driveway. Seems to me he kept driving to get home which caused more damage.
I had a similar situation on…
Permalink
I had a similar situation on my Ford F-250 where I hit an object on the highway at night that punctured the transmission oil pan. Fortunately the only damage was to the pan and loss of oil. The repair cost was just over $1,000. Not covered under warranty but my collision insurance would. Since my collision deductible was $1,000 I opted to pay the cost myself. On the Mach-E in the story, insurance should cover the cost but this will also go against the driver's insurance record, just like any other collision would. It is important that we understand these matters.
Well Well Well, hit a object…
Permalink
Well Well Well, hit a object in the road ! this person clearly could of possibly slowed down and turn the steering wheel to go around the object in the road?, and now is crying because of their stupidness , and blaming Ford of a design flaw ?, come on where does it say to keep driving over something in the Drivers/ owners manual? Can't Fix Stupid!
Butt but but electric cars…
Permalink
Butt but but electric cars are so easy to work on but but but but but but but then reality hits. A it's not a design flaw it's just a failure and the fact is they don't make a lot of these cars compared to normal cars so therefore things cost more your electric battery costs a lot to replace and if it was damaged because of coolant loss well guess what somebody's got to pay for it and if you hit something maybe your insurance will cover it or maybe your insurance will cover none of it? So what I always tell people before they buy these expensive vehicles find out what it to repair because everybody's always on the well it does need oil changes so therefore I don't need to do any services on it. 🤔
30K damage estimate with no…
Permalink
30K damage estimate with no pictures or details of the damage?
How are we supposed to get mad and boycott if we have no idea what the stealership is charging 30k for?
Sure, there was coolant loss. But why 30k? Did the motor overheat and fry the windings or did the IGBTs in the motor controller get fried due to a lack of cooling?
Not knowing the details about the damages, I'd be inclined to think that he could just epoxy the hole in the cooling system and refill it and continue driving. Is the dealership trying to replace things that don't need replacing to make more money off of the customer?
Details, we need details.
I don't know about what…
Permalink
I don't know about what exactly happened here and if it was a small or large rock but I have similar complaints with the underparts of the Mach E and in Tahoe as well. After a trip to skiing I can home to find torn cloth that is under the car that as I was told helps airflow. Replacement cost me about $2k. My question is for a car that is 4x4 and supposed to go in the snow how does it have cloth underneath that can get caught in the snow and ice? Sorry Ford. Just doesn't make sense to me.
So just file on the vehicles…
Permalink
So just file on the vehicles insurance, that's what it's for. If it gets totaled, then you'll be better off.
I’d like to see breakdown of…
Permalink
I’d like to see breakdown of costs on your estimate to understand what parts you need and how much labor is
You may have a case based on the warning system. Was there any warning when you hit the rock or on the way home . How did the car run on your way home . Was there any kind of warning af all such as a noise , power or performance issue . Odor of oil or heat ??
If you had no indication that there was a problem till the next morning I believe that that Ford is responsible and can help you to get it repaired at no cost and get you some $ for your down time and lack of use . It seems absurd that you had to pay for that long distance tow. That’s part of why you bought.a Ford as every gave dealers everywhere . Feel free to message me
Normal road debris doesn't…
Permalink
Normal road debris doesn't puncture metal sheeting. At 60mph, you're talking a rock with sharp edges about the size of a bowling ball to put a gash in sheet metal. The owner of this car isn't being honest.
Likewise, the author is making a pretty questionable statement that a leak in an ICE vehicle is inconvenient. The person said they got towed from their driveway, so they hit something the size of a bowling ball then drove all the way home?! Go ahead and try to drive home with a major oil leak or coolant leak and see if you need a new engine when you finally get home.
Moral of the story, don't hit boulders.
I have a Kia EV6 & after…
Permalink
I have a Kia EV6 & after recently striking a piece of concrete that was in the road at night & blowing my front tire I had a look under the car to see if the was any other damage & the entire underside is covered with a shield. This isn't the only vehicle I've ever owned that was shielded underneath, from 2 Infiniti cars to a Toyota minivan there was at least partial shielding covering critical components so its kind of odd that Ford would leave the Mach E exposed like that. I know they had issues with getting more range, at least in the earlier models, but the increased protection & better aerodynamics should overcome any weight gain.
BTW, gas tanks on many (most?) cars was always on the undercarriage & while they do occasionally get punctured its few & far between.
No design flaw, poo poo…
Permalink
No design flaw, poo poo happens,life comes with twists and turns
So where is the photo?
Permalink
So where is the photo?
You don't bother to post the…
Permalink
You don't bother to post the link to the actual post or pictures of the damage. And then you click bait me with all these "fake" links that lead back to your other articles. Sources is the key to any "real" journalist!
How does he know it was a…
Permalink
How does he know it was a rock and not a piece of metal? This is not a Ford issue. This is an insurance issue, just like any other collision. They will probably total the car. Unfortunately, manufacturers servvice many parts as an assembly. The part that's broken would most likely be cheaper if it was serviced separately. Ford isn't the only one doing this. Try to repair a Tesla with a similar issue. The parts just aren't available separately. If you damage a coolant line, the whole battery has to be replaced.
As a Ford ev tech I can tell…
Permalink
As a Ford ev tech I can tell you no small rock caused that damage. Those coolant lines are well protected. And if it possibly did at that mileage your still under bumper to bumper coverage. That means the repair and tow would have been covered by Ford under warranty
Just stop !! Stop blaming…
Permalink
Just stop !! Stop blaming everyone else, either fix it or notify insurance company you had an accident. You should have pulled over and looked when you allegedly hit a " small rock" Its all on you.
I have a Mach E that I…
Permalink
I have a Mach E that I LEASED (so I wouldn’t be stuck with it if I hated it) and so far have been pleased. It’s comfortable and dependable and has a lot of things going for it, not the least of which is our power company having a partnership with Ford that allows FREE home charging. I’ve had zero fuel costs for 2 yrs now which almost covers the lease payments. That’s the only way I’d ever take on an EV. …Anyway…this is NOT a $40k car, it’s an 80-$90k (maybe more) car that is subsidized by the company and they lose money by the bucket full for every one they ‘sell’. That being said, there is not much wrong with the design as it pertains to light highway or city driving. It has perfectly filled my niche needs and I have no complaints. I will turn the keys over and walk away in 18 months with no regrets. Counting the days to get my wife’s car paid off so I can afford a truck again.