Skip to main content

Several Cybertruck Owners are Reporting That State Farm Insurance is Punishing Them for Driving a Tesla – They Add, “We’re Getting Significant Discounts for Our Gas Cars but Not for Our Teslas”

Several Cybertruck owners have shared their suspicion that State Farm Insurance is penalizing them for driving a Tesla. The discussion began with one Tesla owner; however, many other Tesla owners have reported similar experiences with State Farm.

Ken, a Cybertruck owner from Kansas, has shared his suspicion that State Farm Insurance is penalizing him for driving a Tesla.

Ken is taking part in State Farm’s “Drive Safe & Save” initiative. Those who join this program install a tracking device from State Farm in their cars. This device evaluates driving behavior and, depending on their habits, enables participants to earn discounts on their insurance premiums.

Ken has enrolled all five of his vehicles in this program, including his Cybertruck, Tesla Model 3, and three additional internal combustion vehicles.

Since installing State Farm devices in his cars, Ken reports substantial insurance discounts for all his gas vehicles.

Nonetheless, the premium discount on his Cybertruck and Tesla Model 3 has essentially stayed the same.

Now, Ken is convinced that State Farm is somehow penalizing him for driving a Tesla.

The frustrated Cybertruck owner shared his story on the Cybertruck Owners Club forum.

He writes…

“Is State Farm Insurance punishing Tesla Owners?  

I have a question for anyone using the State Farm Drive Safe and Save pucks in their Tesla. I have these pucks in my Model 3, my Cybertruck, both of my kids' cars, and my weekend fun toy car (the last three being gas vehicles).  

As I understand it, the program is supposed to give you a discount based on your driving—how much you drive, how you drive, etc. Provided that you drive well, you get a discount on your premium.  

The discounts for my kids' cars and my weekend fun toy gas car are all significant, maybe as much as 20% off the premium. However, the discount for both of my Teslas is minimal—perhaps $5 or $10.  

I let my daughter borrow the Model 3, yet the discount didn't change, even though she was the driver versus her normal car, which is a Mazda CX5 (gas).  

I drive my weekend fun toy (gas) car, and the discount is still much higher, even though I'm driving the same way as I would drive my Teslas—probably driving faster, given that it is a sports car that makes loud noises.  

So the discount isn't based on who the driver is or their driving style, since my daughter has no impact on the Tesla's score, and I have radically different results between driving a gas car and driving a Tesla.  

Is there something in State Farm's formula that penalizes Tesla owners regarding the discount they receive in the program? For example, I noticed my braking scores in the app are often a "C" grade on my Teslas, yet I hardly ever use the brakes. I either let FSD or the regen do it, so there are no sudden slams on the brakes. Meanwhile, with my weekend fun toy, I hammer on those brakes all day long when I drive it, yet it gets a better braking score. What gives?  

I am curious if other owners out there using this State Farm Drive Safe and Save have ever been able to achieve any significant discount with a Tesla in the program. If not, then I should probably be raising this issue with State Farm.”

This situation is certainly intriguing, and even more surprisingly, several other Tesla owners insured by State Farm have reported receiving penalties for driving a Tesla.

A fellow Tesla owner, Stephen from New York, writes…

“I have the State Farm Safe & Save beacon in my daughter’s vehicle. She’s driving a Tesla Model 3; the biggest hit she gets is hard braking.

The problem is she doesn’t use the brake pedal; it’s all regen braking. She has had it for more than 6 months now, and so far, the discount is only about $15, which is nothing like what they said it could be based on her safe driving record.

I have all parental controls activated as well as chill mode, but she’s not receiving any discounts like the advertised 20-50%.

They provided additional beacons for the other cars (Model S, Model X, Cybertruck), which I have declined.

Until I see actual savings from the Model 3, I’m not going to include them in any other car I own.”

Another Cybertruck owner from Idaho also shares a similar feeling that State Farm is penalizing him for driving a Tesla.

The Cybertruck owner says he often gets dinged when driving with Tesla’s full self-driving software. However, citing Tesla’s autopilot safety report, the Cybertruck owner argues that he should receive a discount for using FSD rather than driving manually.

He writes…

“What a coincidence! This is exactly the topic I intended to discuss today. We have State Farm's Safe and Save program active in our Cybertruck AWD, which we previously used in our Toyota Prius Prime before trading it for the Cybertruck. The program worked exceptionally well with the Toyota. All we needed to do was drive cautiously - brake gently, accelerate smoothly, avoid sharp turns, and stay within the speed limit (or up to 10% over). We also had to avoid touching our phone screens, or we would get penalized. However, the discount made it worthwhile.

Fast forward to the Cybertruck we got last November. I drive almost entirely using FSD, while my wife prefers to drive herself most of the time. Our State Farm driving score is perfect for phone distraction, cornering, and speed. Braking is a bit lower, around 90 (still qualifying for the discount), but ACCELERATION is around 60! That's a big hit!

Looking at the detailed drives, I can see that the violations occur almost entirely on my trips (under FSD). We have a series of stop signs on the straightaway from our house to town. Our Cybertruck stops smoothly at each stop but tends to accelerate HARD up to the 25 mph speed limit afterward.

This pattern occurs at each stop sign on my route to town. The acceleration following a stop sign makes up the vast majority of the acceleration events recorded in our State Farm driving profile. After stopping at a traffic light, I often find myself behind slowly accelerating vehicles, which keeps my Cybertruck from speeding off. However, these stops on our little road have no traffic. I stop... and then POW, we're off!

I am driving in Standard or Chill mode -- it makes no difference in the acceleration.

After reading that a Tesla under FSD is roughly 10 times safer (even in supervised mode) than the average driver, I would expect some way to detect that a computer is driving, and that finding should give me a discount! However, the insurance companies are not in sync with Tesla, at least."

Overall, looking at the comments, many more Tesla drivers have noted that insurance companies are unfairly penalizing them for unsafe driving.

Please let me know what you think in the comments. Share your ideas by clicking the RED “Add new comment” button below. Also, be sure to visit our site, torquenews.com/Tesla, regularly for the latest updates.

For more information, check out: A Tesla Cybertruck Owner Says He Felt Something Was Broken When He Went Back to His Ford F-250 After a Few Months Exclusively Driving His Cybertruck – Adds “It Felt Archaic & Clunky”

Tinsae Aregay has been following Tesla and the evolution of the EV space daily for several years. He covers everything about Tesla, from the cars to Elon Musk, the energy business, and autonomy. Follow Tinsae on Twitter at @TinsaeAregay for daily Tesla news.

Comments

Buzz Wired (not verified)    May 7, 2025 - 12:05PM

The real problem here is that Teslas go to entropy in light to moderate crashes. No one's being penalized. You just selected flimsy EVs, that's all.

Brad (not verified)    May 8, 2025 - 5:16AM

I wouldn’t touch one of those monitoring programs with a ten foot pole. It just gives insurance companies the evidence they need to jack up your rates. I’ll pay the normal premiums and drive how I please.

Jeff (not verified)    May 8, 2025 - 7:38AM

We pay only $80/month for full coverage ($300k per accident) with $1k deductable with State Farm on our Model Y in WV. We don't use their tracking service discount but we do have the multivehicle discount.

Bobm (not verified)    May 8, 2025 - 9:13AM

State Farm has no way of knowing WHO is driving the car, so the idea that the discount should change when you lend it to the daughter is just absurd.

Matt (not verified)    May 8, 2025 - 10:43AM

No one's being punished, the cost of insuring your tesla, for many reasons, is just higher.

Also...why's a guy who has a "weekend run car" so concerned over $15 ?!?!

Anon (not verified)    May 8, 2025 - 11:19AM

Logic is a bit off on claiming you drive a quiet car with a ton of torque slower than you drive a loud sports car. The noise from a loud gas car keeps you aware of your speed, especially since it tends to correlate to your speed. In a quiet car, like the gas luxury car I own, I'm much less likely to notice I'm speeding than in the old muscle car I had as a teenager. The handling is better and it makes less noise so my brain automatically assumes my speed is fine.

Normal Driver (not verified)    May 8, 2025 - 1:00PM

So many easy explanations for this that have nothing to do with some conspiracy by State Farm to penalize Tesla owners, but I'm not surprised they have a victim complex and lack critical thinking.

1. The reason why your "weekend fun" car gets a steeper discount is because you drive it less. That simple.
2. A significant amount of Tesla-involved accidents are due to technical malfunction, so individual driving habits would naturally have a lower impact on cost than for, say, an old ICE.
3. The tracking device does not know who is driving, so obviously it doesn't matter if you lent it to your daughter.
4. The biggest issue is most likely what data the Tesla computer is feeding the device, as evidenced by the fact that your acceleration score stayed the same in different acceleration modes and FSD had no impact whatsoever.

Henry (not verified)    May 9, 2025 - 6:17AM

This is happening across most major insurance companies, they are also quoting outrageous premiums and citing the fact that it's a Tesla, although Teslas are very safe. It's a scheme to take down Tesla by making it really difficult to own one.

Nonyabiz (not verified)    May 11, 2025 - 12:37PM

In reply to by Henry (not verified)

It's hardly a new plot by the insurance companies to penalize Tesla. Remember when it came out a few years back that Hyundai and Kia vehicles were easy to steal, and theftv and vandalism went up? Insurance companies actually refused to insure those brands at all for awhile in some areas. And premiums went sky high. Now that Teslas are more vulnerable to vandalism damage, same things will apply.

Additionally, the safety of FSD is an open question. There were multiple investigations by NTSB etc into fatal crashes caused by problems with the tech (inability to detect stopped trucks due to bumper height, accelerating straight into cement structures etc) AND there are multiple documented accounts of some Tesla owners using the technology to completely screw off behind the wheel (sleeping, reading, playing video games etc). So, it's very possible that the insurance companies have data that FSD actually raises risk of certain types of accidents. Add in the high repair and replacement costs of a Tesla compared to a Mazda and they'll b hike rates. And these programs are meant to reward safe human drivers. They are not going to cater to a single brand using experimental tech when the vast majority of their customers drive normally. That's how their algorithm works. If the computer behaves in a way that is indistinguishable from a more dangerous human driver, well, tough luck. (You do obviously have the option to disengage FSD if the discount is important to you, as clearly the two systems don't play well together.)

Finally, in case you weren't aware, here's a secret about insurance premiums: they are meant first and foremost to provide profit for the company. Meaning the premium must be higher than what is necessary to cover the actual risks given the situation. Insurance companies have been spiking rates for years (partly due to using auto policies to cover for high claims to homeowners' policies from natural disasters, because OF COURSE the insurance company MUST still make a profit even in high claims years), and when you call they claim there are lots of accidents in your area. Yet, their profits continue to break records. Point being, while these discount programs might give you some savings, they are designed NOT to allow you to save as much as you "should" given your actual risk. If you did, it would eliminate their margin. So my bet here is that EVEN IF FSD is in fact safer, they have no motivation to resign the algorithm-they're getting more money out of it. And they don't care at all if you switch companies, because they know the others are just as bad so plenty more people will be switching to them as you're leaving.

ThatGuy (not verified)    May 11, 2025 - 8:13AM

State farm will do whatever they please anyway. If this is to "punish" Tesla owners, then State Farm has been punishing "Florida homeowner's" for years for no reason than our location. It's like people don't understand the difference in risk assessment from person and place is vastly different.