Should a 2025 GMC Sierra owner with the 2.7-liter turbo engine trade for another 2025 GMC Sierra with the larger 5.3-liter V8?
So first, imagine purchasing a new 2025 GMC Sierra pickup, and shortly after you purchase it, you are having buyer's regret. The pickup is underpowered with the 2.7-liter turbo engine, and now you wish you had bought the 5.3-liter V8.
Sal Safar on the 2025 Chevy Silverado & GMC Sierra Owners Facebook page says,
"Please help. This is my first truck, and it has the 2.7L engine. I really love the truck, but it feels a bit slow to respond, probably because of the smaller engine. I'm thinking about switching to the 5.3L V8. Can someone explain the difference between these two engines? Thank you!"
It's not going to go well when he wants to trade first of all.
Before we go there, what is the difference between the GMC Sierra 2.7L Engine and the 5.3L V8?
The 2.7L Turbo and 5.3L V8 engines in the GMC Sierra 1500 offer distinct performance characteristics. The 2.7L Turbo (TurboMax) prioritizes torque and fuel efficiency, while the 5.3L V8 emphasizes horsepower and towing capacity. The 2.7L offers more torque for quicker acceleration and better fuel economy, while the 5.3L provides more horsepower for towing and overall performance.
Here's a more detailed comparison:
2.7L Turbo (TurboMax):
- Power: 310 horsepower, 430 lb-ft of torque.
- Transmission: 8-speed automatic
- Fuel Economy: 19 mpg city / 22 mpg highway.
- Towing: Up to 9,500 lbs.
Pros: Offers a strong torque curve for responsive acceleration, good fuel economy, and is often the standard engine on many trims
Cons: Might feel less powerful than the V8 for heavier towing, and may not be preferred for those seeking maximum horsepower
5.3L V8:
- Power: 355 horsepower, 383 lb-ft of torque.
- Transmission: 10-speed automatic.
- Fuel Economy: 16 mpg city / 21 mpg highway.
- Towing: Up to 11,000 lbs with max trailering package.
Pros: Stronger towing capacity, more horsepower for quicker acceleration, and generally preferred for heavier towing tasks.
Cons: Less fuel-efficient than the 2.7L Turbo.
So, Which is the Best Engine?
Choose the 2.7L Turbo for a balance of torque, fuel economy, and responsive performance for everyday driving and lighter towing. It's a great choice for those who prioritize fuel efficiency and don't need the maximum towing capacity.
Choose the 5.3L V8 for maximum towing capacity, stronger horsepower, and performance for more demanding tasks.
Now, what will happen when Sal goes right back to the GMC to trade his truck for another 2025 model year pickup?
Trading in a 2025 GMC pickup for another 2025 GMC pickup for a different model and trim level, immediately after purchase, will likely result in a significant loss in value due to depreciation, even though it's a new vehicle. This is a factor that should be carefully considered before making a decision.
The initial drop in value occurs the moment a new vehicle is driven off the lot, and this loss is compounded by the fact that you are trading it in so soon.
The 2025 GMC Sierra is not considered a used vehicle even if it has less than 500 miles on it.
This means Sal will take a significant hit in what the GMC dealer will be willing to give him on a trade.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Immediate Depreciation: New vehicles, including GMC trucks, depreciate the most in the first year of ownership, and even more so within the first few months. This is because the value of a vehicle is based on its condition, mileage, and age, and even a brand-new vehicle is considered used once it's been titled.
Dealers need to factor in their costs of preparing the vehicle for resale, including reconditioning, advertising, and potential profit margin.
A Reddit user does the right thing and asks questions first before pulling the trigger on a new truck.
He says, I want to get a Silverado 1500 RST 4x4, and I'm trying to decide which engine to get. From what I've read, the stats for the two engines are.
2.7L Turbo V4: 310 HP, 430 lbs torque, 18/21 city/hwy mpg, trailering 9,000 lbs.
5.3L V8: 355 HP, 383 lbs torque, 16/20 city/hwy mpg, trailering 9,300 lbs.
However, the 5.3L has a Max Trailering option that increases towing from 9,300 lbs to 11,000 lbs. Max Trailering option is not available on the 2.7L.
So, it appears that while the 2.7L has much higher torque, its horsepower is just too small to haul larger loads. If I went with the 5.3L, I would opt for Max Trailering.
Conclusion:
Sal should have done his homework and conducted a more thorough investigation. This is a reminder of the importance of being well-informed before making a significant purchase, empowering you to make the best decision for your needs.
How About You?
Which 2025 GMC Sierra engine would you buy? We'd love to hear your thoughts. If so, click the red Add New Comment link below and let us know. Your input is valuable and can help others in their decision-making process.
Check out my 2025 GMC Sierra story: I Bought a 2025 GMC Sierra and With Only 100 Miles I Had It Towed To the Dealer, The Engine Is Making A Horrible Death Rattle
I am Denis Flierl, a Senior Torque News Reporter since 2012. My 30+ year tenure in the automotive industry, initially in a consulting role with every major car brand and later as a freelance journalist test-driving new vehicles, has equipped me with a wealth of knowledge. I specialize in reporting the latest automotive news, covering owner stories, and providing expert analysis, ensuring that you are always well-informed and up-to-date. Follow me on X @DenisFlierl, @WorldsCoolestRides, Facebook, and Instagram
Photo credit: Denis Flierl
Comments
This bloke's gonna take it…
Permalink
This bloke's gonna take it in the shorts when he dumps the gutless truck. Who buys a truck with a dinky power plant and no power? Remember...there's a very good reason why a larger motor is available.
It's not a compact car, it's…
Permalink
In reply to This bloke's gonna take it… by Buzz Wired (not verified)
It's not a compact car, it's a full size pickup truck It needs a V8. I would never buy 4 cylinder truck. I wouldn't even buy a V6 truck.
My 6.0 L is s the greatest motor Chevrolet ever made with the exception of the 350
Spot on !!
Permalink
In reply to It's not a compact car, it's… by Michael Brophy (not verified)
Spot on !!
It depends on what he is…
Permalink
In reply to This bloke's gonna take it… by Buzz Wired (not verified)
It depends on what he is using it for. I have had both engines in 2 different newer model Silverados. The 4 cyl Turbo feels like it accelerates better than the bigger V8. For heavier towing the V8 is the better option, but for daily driving it's not much of a difference and the 4 cyl Turbo is the better choice.
It's not a capable full size…
Permalink
It's not a capable full size trucks if it's powered by a 4 banger.
The fact that there is even a 4 cylinder option is a disgrace.
From what I understand he's…
Permalink
From what I understand he's saying he wants a faster truck and he thinks the v8's going to be faster than the turbo which I don't think is the case what's the 0 to 60 on both of those whoever this guy is she doesn't sound like he's towing stuff or using this truck for work or pulling a trailer He's driving around town I think that whatever the hell it is 2.7 is just fine with the turbo in it I've never had one but I drove around in a V6 1500 Dodge RAM for a month or so and I loved it I did miss the V8 but I'm back in a V8 now but I need it for work but I did like that gas mileage. He also may not be familiar with how turbos work I've never actually had one but I'm kind of familiar how they work it's kind of a delayed reaction you don't get the turbo right away it kicks in after you hit the gas at some point or at least that's what the older ones did the one turbo that I've ever been in
Facts are difficult to argue…
Permalink
In reply to From what I understand he's… by Bryan May (not verified)
Facts are difficult to argue.
0-60 times on the 2.7 are about 1.5 seconds quicker.
2.7 Turbo is the first engine built by GM that did the 2.5 million miles of testing without a single failure. About 75 engines ran for 300.000 miles each.
5.3 does not develop max torque until around 4000 rpms. At 2,000 rpm,, the 5.3 is only producing 150 ft/lbs. The 2.7 is already at 375 ft/lbs.
I have pull side by side 6,500 lb trailers with both engines. The 2.7 is far better pulling.
All things equal, an engine that has to run at much higher rpms will wear out quicker.
The 2.7 is built like a diesel. Even in the Colorado, it does not get great great mileage.
By far, the best 1500 engine is the 3.0 diesel.
The engine did. How many…
Permalink
In reply to Facts are difficult to argue… by What do I know (not verified)
The engine did. How many transmissions though?
Yeap that's the same thing i…
Permalink
In reply to Facts are difficult to argue… by What do I know (not verified)
Yeap that's the same thing i experienced. Nothing wrong with the 4 cyl Turbo engine.
Most people just can't get over a 4 cyl in a full size truck.
the 4 cyl turbo in my…
Permalink
the 4 cyl turbo in my colorado is smooth a motor a 1500 it must shift n shift like the turbo jeeps .the 4.3 motor was perfect for a truck two pull a car our small boat wood weekend projects
Sal in my opinion the 5.3 is…
Permalink
Sal in my opinion the 5.3 is better for that size truck i own a 2001 with a 5.3 an its still running 246.000miles
1500 series truck with that…
Permalink
1500 series truck with that engine is way to small, top it off GM has no clue on building them right. The 5.3L is a crappy engine, transmission issues, lifters, etc. not as numerous as the 6.2L but still the 5.3L has issues
I had a 3500 Dmax that I…
Permalink
I had a 3500 Dmax that I didn’t need after selling my 5th wheel. I found lots of Silverado 1500’s with the 2.7 at a low price. I’m an old school guy that believes there is no replacment for displacement. Glad I got the 5.3. Plenty of pep and when I go from Kentucky to Texas to pick up a 68 Camaro I’ll feel much better towing.
Laughable that 300hp is not…
Permalink
Laughable that 300hp is not enough go pull a trailer. Drove a lot of dump trucks over the years with 185 to 250hp hauling 8 to 10 tons of material.
The REAL consideration is what happens after 100k. That turbo motor will need a lot more money to keep it alive.
Then again, neither of these creampuffs will see 200k. GM quit building trucks in 06.
You are so right in the '70s…
Permalink
In reply to Laughable that 300hp is not… by Tom (not verified)
You are so right in the '70s and the '80s and most of the '90s there weren't many trucks over 300 horsepower and people were Towing just fine
I have a 2021 Silverado LT 2…
Permalink
I have a 2021 Silverado LT 2.7 Crewcab. Generally I’m very satisfied with the engine’s performance, though the 8-speed has proven to be a disappointment, having had to rebuild it at a considerable cost. Aside from that, I do not think the turbo four is slow in response; it really depends on your pedal competence. I have out-accelerated several high-end performance cars at red lights, with little effort. I also like the fair fuel economy, while not great, still allows you to afford driving a full sized truck.
Never get a turbo. Go for…
Permalink
Never get a turbo. Go for the most powerful Natural aspiration v8 you can get.
I bought a Silverado with a 4.8 NA v8 and it was embarrassing.
I swapped it for a 6.0 and it rocks with headers and a tune it dinoed at 415 hp and 440 torq with a 93 tune.
Neither! I just bought an…
Permalink
Neither! I just bought an old model, low mileage Dodge 360 that out performs both of them and doesn't have the DOD junk!!!
Buy the 6.2.
Permalink
Buy the 6.2.
Smaller engines end up…
Permalink
Smaller engines end up working alot harder than larger engines, especially if they have a turbo. I don't expect any of these small engines that are going into trucks and SUVs these days to last more than 10 years (about 150000km) without being replaced. Car companies are following the Apple business model now, it seems.
LZO 3.0 diesel is best…
Permalink
LZO 3.0 diesel is best engine for most people for gm 1500 pickups.
Got the 3.0 diesel here, 30…
Permalink
In reply to LZO 3.0 diesel is best… by Brad (not verified)
Got the 3.0 diesel here, 30 mpg daily driver, pull a 29ft TT, awesome truck.
News flash: New cars…
Permalink
News flash: New cars depreciate quickly. Models with less desirable accessories like small engines on trucks when big ones are available depreciate even more quickly.
While I can understand the…
Permalink
While I can understand the allure to the V8, I have the 2.7 Turbo, for everyday, light hauling (no towing) the engine is just fine. Yes it’s not a powerhouse, but gets up and goes when needed.
My advice would be get the…
Permalink
My advice would be get the bigger 5 .3 because the fuel mileage isn't much different, just don't buy a Ford,or if you have a thing about newer vehicles like me find something that doesn't have a computer,
For one thing a 4 Cylinder…
Permalink
For one thing a 4 Cylinder should have never been put in a full size pickup. It sounds good on paper but what about the Longevity of a 4 cylinder Engine. With a turbo pulling a 9000 lb. Load behind it going too last?? me I would not have even thought about it.
Got to get 5000 on it to…
Permalink
Got to get 5000 on it to break in . I believe I have one of the best engines made. It's the "LS" based 4.3 V6. They stopped making it because you can't kill it. Big mistake GM. When mine got broken in, I was completely satisfied.
Wouldn't buy neither, GM had…
Permalink
Wouldn't buy neither, GM had terrible customer service and my 2023 trail boss was in the shop for several months and they were unable to fix it. Gave it back to me with problem still existing, said they acknowledged the issue but did not know how to fix it. Truck ran like crap, power surges. Traded it off after owning it for less than a year. Went back to a Toyota Tundra... Love it !!
The 5.3 is also slow, he…
Permalink
The 5.3 is also slow, he should try a Ford 3.5, he will be amazed!
The 6.2 with 10 speed is…
Permalink
In reply to The 5.3 is also slow, he… by Bob (not verified)
The 6.2 with 10 speed is just as fast.
Pagination