Skip to main content

Congress Must Pass The RPM Act To Save The Aftermarket Industry And Save The Racecars

Those who modify vehicles for the purpose of racing them are currently in jeopardy of not being allowed to do so, under current interpretation of the Clean Air Act. The Recognizing the Protection of Motorsports Act (RPM) of 2019 has been reintroduced into Congress for vote and consideration. SEMA and others have started a petition to have their voices heard.

I find politics exhausting generally – especially after the last couple of years. I generally like to ignore most of the talking head news shows and pay little attention to the nonsense that goes in Washington D.C.

I wrote a story predicting that the end of the gasoline engine was not as close as some people want you to believe. And in doing that opinion piece, I encountered other stories of the same ilk. And it brought me to write this opinion piece about a bill that's making it way through D.C.

I took note of a bill reintroduced recently known as the Recognizing the Protection of Motorsports (RPM) Act. This bill was first introduced and advanced through political committees in 2019. Now with a new legislation, as well as a change at the executive level, the bipartisan bill was reintroduced.

Photo courtesy of SEMAWhat Is The RPM Act?
In a nutshell, the RPM Act clarifies interpretation of the Clean Air Act, which is a long-standing environmentally-focused piece of legislation. For years there was much ambiguity in the Clean Air Act and often, based upon who was in the Oval Office, the EPA did little to force interpretations one way or the other. However, previously under the Obama administration and now under the Biden administration, there is concern that certain interpretations and enforcement could lead to preventing individuals from tuning or modifying their personal vehicles for the sake of racing.

Therefore, the RPM Act looks to clarify that racecars used exclusively for competition do not violate any portion of the Clean Air Act.

According to a news story on aftermarketnews.com, the American tradition of tuning and modifying a vehicle for the purpose of racing “was unquestioned for nearly 50 years until 2015 when the EPA took the position that converted street vehicles that compete on the track must remain emissions-compliant, even though they are not driven on public streets or highways. The EPA also maintains that the equipment used to transform a street vehicle into a racecar is prohibited.”

As such, the necessity of the RPM Act is needed.

SEMA united ignited causeThe Politics Behind The RPM Act
U.S. Senators Richard Burr, a Republican from North Carolina, and Joe Manchin, a Democrat from West Virginia, were co-sponsors on the bill and they also got 24 other Senators to endorse the legislature.

Having bipartisan support in such a divided legislative branch will be extremely important to advance RPM.

“American racing runs on traditions,” said Senator Burr. “For more than 50 years, motorsports enthusiasts have purchased cars and modified them to race, off of public roads. However, this tradition was threatened when the Obama EPA attempted to make these modifications illegal. This legislation upholds Congress’ intent of the Clean Air Act and protects motorsports, for professionals and amateurs alike, for years to come. I’m proud to work with my colleagues on this bipartisan legislation, and I look forward to seeing it move through the Senate.”

Senator Manchin weighed in as well. “A big part of the fun of motorsports is the tradition of modifying regular cars into racecars,” he said. “This legislation upholds amendments to the Clean Air Act that exempt modified vehicles and racecars from certain environmental regulations, protecting motorsports for years to come. I am proud to be a part of this bipartisan bill and look forward to the boost it will give to motorsports.”

SEMA logoSEMA Takes A Strong Stance In Support of RPM
Specialty Equipment Market Association, better known as SEMA, has come out passionately in favor of RPM, imploring its members to write their elected officials and have their voices heard.

SEMA says, “Motorsports competition involves tens of thousands of participants and vehicle owners each year, both amateur and professional. Retail sales of racing products make up a nearly $2 billion market annually. Most of the vehicles raced on the estimated 1,300 racetracks operating across the U.S. are converted vehicles that the EPA considers to be illegal.”

SEMA President & CEO Chris Kersting has come out vocally in support of RPM and the Senators who helped to advance it through the legislative chamber.
“SEMA looks forward to working with Congress to enact the RPM Act and make permanent the Clean Air Act’s original intention that race vehicle conversions are legal,” said Kersting. “We thank Senators Burr and Manchin for reintroducing a bill that will protect businesses that produce, install and sell the parts that enable racers to compete.”

SEMA has a link about RPM where you can contact your elected official in support of the bill. Find more on SEMA's RPM stance along with their petition here.

Final Thought
RPM seems necessary to stop government overreach and misinterpretation of an ambiguous, albeit well-meaning, law. In the overarching umbrella of The Green New Deal, there’s a lot of passion for environmentalism. And there’s nothing wrong with that. Many of us are in favor cleaner air and a greener planet. But, if you want to get young people enthused about environmentalism, attacking their hobby and passion is not the answer.

The Fast and the Furious franchise has made a huge cultural impact on young people. Many love tuning and modifying their cars. Being told they can’t do it will only anger them and hurt the overall cause. RPM should be passed and signed into law to not only protect individual rights, but to protect a billion-dollar industry like the automotive aftermarket.

And in Sacramento, California, they just banned many DIY auto repairs including body work and engine swaps, as I reported on here.

New York state just passed the SLEEP Act which punishes owners of vehicles with loud exhausts. Read more about the SLEEP Act here.

What are your thoughts on this? Leave me your comments below.

Jimmy Dinsmore has been an automotive journalist for more than a decade and been a writer since the high school. His Driver’s Side column features new car reviews and runs in several newspapers throughout the country. He is also co-author of the book “Mustang by Design” and “Ford Trucks: A Unique Look at the Technical History of America’s Most Popular Truck”. Also, Jimmy works in the social media marketing world for a Canadian automotive training aid manufacturing company. Follow Jimmy on Facebook, Twitter, at his special Ford F-150 coverage on Twitter and LinkedIn. You can read the most of Jimmy's stories by searching Torque News Ford for daily Ford vehicle report.

Comments

ThisGuy (not verified)    March 25, 2021 - 7:46PM

Obviously you haven't actually read the act. Because its very clearly designed to allow people like the Diesel brothers to get away with what they did. I've done plenty of mods on plenty of things and I can smell the money trail a mile away. This isn't for the modders, this is for the companies that throw billions of dollars around. If it would have just exempted motorsports it would have been fine, but that's not what its actually doing.

I would have agreed with you if it wouldn't have been for part 3b of the act. Something that makes it illegal for the EPA to keep track of who sells the parts, where the parts are going, who installs the parts, or who uses the parts. If it were really about saving motorsports then they wouldn't have any problem letting the EPA keep an eye on assholes like the Diesel brothers.

Rhonda Starr (not verified)    April 1, 2021 - 12:20PM

The RPM Act should be renamed the Coal-rolling Hillbilly On-road Authorization Doubtlessness Act, or CHOAD for short.

The way to keep these tuners in business and also guaranteeing that modified vehicles stay off public roads is to require tuners to invalidate vehicle registrations (and take their license plates) for any vehicle they modify or ship their tunes to.

vic hoth (not verified)    April 19, 2021 - 8:31AM

In reply to by Jimmy Dinsmore

Rhonda is correct! Where do you see coal-rolling on the racetrack?
Usually it's toothless dumbasses who can barely do basic math and just wanna yell about Freedom while endangering other humans for the sake of fun.
True racing folks have a trailer for their track vehicle, and it's usually NOT a 2 ton that's been inappropriately lifted for bad off-road steering geometry.

Vin (not verified)    April 22, 2021 - 1:48PM

In reply to by Jimmy Dinsmore

so, you think we should have a free-for-all, with Mad Max style, goat choakin' coal-rollers on the highway?
Oh, and by the way, you still need to get your car inspected every year. Still need proper fire exits at the theatre so people can escape. Doctors still need licencing so they don't kill you. Electricians need to be certified so they don't fry your house. Cooks need to keep a clean kitchen so they don't spread food-borne bactieria. We have regulation for a reason. And the biggest reason is because STUPID MORONS went too far with 'freedom' to infringe on others (with smoke, smog, redneck engineering, or otherwise ignoring the existence of other humans and being inconsiderate to the planet, future generations and clean air and water).

Jimmy Dinsmore    April 22, 2021 - 3:33PM

In reply to by Vin (not verified)

Sadly, today, too many people think like you and are fine with government over reach, over regulation and basically complying with big government. This is a microcosm of that mentality and I say, yeah, no thanks. Live and let live. Stop impeding on person property and personal freedoms.
There's a huge jump between telling a restaurant how to prep food and telling Joe the Weekend Race Car tuner what he can and can't do with his Buick Grand National. That's where you and I diverge on this, and that's fine.

Vin (not verified)    April 22, 2021 - 5:35PM

In reply to by Jimmy Dinsmore

Again, another moron who didn't read. A Buick Grand National would not be covered in this bill. It specifies the years in production and modifications allowed, and the majority of the legislative focus is on diesel emissions delete.
Grand Nationals didn't have a diesel engine.
So where you and I diverge on the subject is ignorance vs. informed. Yet you still mouth-off your igno-ramble to anger the other toothless igno's.

vin (not verified)    April 19, 2021 - 8:26AM

Miatas don't have a Cummins with delete kits. You are associating 2 things that have nothing to do with each other just because "Magnaflow" doesn't want to pay $850,000 fine (they helped introduce the bill to save their delete kit biz). How many huge trucks do you see on the racetrack?

vin (not verified)    April 19, 2021 - 12:52PM

It's not about 'tinkerers' - read the bill.
It's specific to exhaust delete.
Magnaflow was one of the 3 big-name reps that went to Washington DC after they got fined.

Jimmy Dinsmore    April 23, 2021 - 11:43AM

I will always be opposed to government overreach that is needless. Live and let live. There'w way too much compliance toward the government any more. Ronald Reagan said it best: The scariest words you can hear are I'm from the government and I'm here to help. Yeah, no thanks.

john s tarnowski (not verified)    May 9, 2021 - 1:57PM

I built my 1989 turbo gt to drive on street and drive to race track, let me tell you, back in the dinosaur period there were many volcanoes causing high co2 levels, it was much hotter and 5 to 17 times the co2 today, there were no ice caps but life flourished, vegetation was real dense around the world trees you could fit a house in, world didnt end then, trees and vegetation live off co2 and they use the co2 to make oxygen, today there are not many active volcanoes left and the past ice ages were caused by low co2 levels, cars have replaced the volcanoes but even with them our co2 levels are far lower today, take that away and vegetation will die, food will disappear, less oxygen and another ice age will be born, they blame our weather on co2 what a bunch of crap, our magnetic fields are causing this, what about the rest of the world you think they are going to go alone with this, no china will eat us for lunch, you think our leaders our going to follow there own rules hell no, im not against electric cars let people that want them buy them and people that want the gas cars have them they can live together, those battery's dont last a long time and cost almost as much as the cars not to mention they are toxic waist, im telling you the truth, there is no truth today all about power and money, no common sense nothing but lies everywhere brain washing our kids really sick people running our country.
john tarnowski

J (not verified)    June 15, 2021 - 7:37PM

Is everyone ignoring the fact that this applies to EMISSIONS SYSTEMS? Not suspension or aero or anything else. There's no way they would be able to legally argue for anything else. I find it hard to believe every single racecar needs to be catless. Stop being paranoid.

Jimmy Dinsmore    June 16, 2021 - 8:00AM

In reply to by J (not verified)

It's hard to defend or get on board with more government interference into private lives. I will never understand the mentality of it's just a little bit. You give a little, they'll take more. And I don't mean to sound like some Q-Anon anti-government wacko because I'm far from that. I just have become bewildered with how so many just are okay with allowing the government to take more and more of their personal freedoms. And people just comply.

J (not verified)    June 16, 2021 - 12:45PM

In reply to by Jimmy Dinsmore

Are you suggesting that you have (or should have) ultimate freedom to do anything you want at any time? Or that the government doesn't restrict you in other ways that you've simply accepted over the years? There's a big difference between being told that you can't remove a catalytic converter and being told where you're going to work or live or whom you're going to marry. What I don't understand is why people think any level of government regulation automatically equals concentration camps. We wouldn't have most of the stuff we do without some level of government regulation. Or do you think we don't need government at all? Besides, most people (not necessarily you) who think this way are also anti-abortion (private lives) or anti-gay (private lives). I agree that there are lots of things that don't need regulation but when you start affecting air quality for those around you, that's more than just private life. Same reason we outlawed smoking in public places.

J (not verified)    June 16, 2021 - 12:51PM

In reply to by Jimmy Dinsmore

It's also funny to me how defensive you are about this. No one is attacking you personally. Maybe the strength of your reaction shows how insecure you are underneath? If you were actually strong you wouldn't care about what "the gub'ment" was telling you to do, you'd just do it and flip them the bird. This is just you whining because you know you're in the minority. For once.

Jimmy Dinsmore    June 17, 2021 - 7:22AM

In reply to by J (not verified)

This isn't meant to be an us vs. them on the political spectrum discussion. I am quite libertarian though and believe in as minimal government as possible. Obviously they're needed for some things (keeping our food safe, etc.) but as far as personal lives it should be live and let live. BTW, I'm pro choice because again, the government should not be telling people what they can and can't do with their bodies.