If you’re an outdoorsman considering the 2024 Toyota Tacoma, or a current owner of one, you may have noticed a heated conversation brewing online. One specific post in the Toyota Tacoma 4th Gen 2024+ Facebook group has ignited discussions about a key aspect of this truck which is its gas tank size. Kurt Cose, a member of the group, recently shared his frustration after embarking on an ambitious road trip.
“I just did a 4,400-mile road trip, and I have two complaints,” Kurt wrote. “The 2024 Toyota Tacoma needs a bigger turbo and a bigger gas tank. It’s annoying when I’m stopping every 200 miles for gas. Let me be clear, I’m not complaining about the gas mileage. I’m complaining about the size of the tank they put in the truck.”
His post resonated with many, particularly those who love using their Tacoma for off-road adventures or lengthy road trips. For outdoor enthusiasts, a smaller gas tank can be a logistical nightmare. Whether you’re traversing backcountry roads or making your way through isolated trails, frequent stops at gas stations can disrupt the flow of an adventure, especially when gas stations aren’t always accessible.
Why Did Toyota Downsize the Gas Tank?
The 4th-generation Tacoma comes with an 18.2-gallon gas tank, a noticeable drop from the 21-gallon capacity in the 3rd generation. This decision has sparked widespread confusion and criticism. Why would Toyota reduce the tank size, especially for a vehicle so popular among off-road enthusiasts and long-haul adventurers?
One likely explanation is weight reduction. Smaller tanks weigh less, which can improve fuel efficiency slightly and align with the industry’s broader push towards meeting stricter emissions regulations. Additionally, Toyota likely wanted to optimize the Tacoma’s new platform for overall performance, but it seems this decision came at the expense of practicality for long-distance travelers.
This trade-off hasn’t gone unnoticed. Dan Conger chimed in on Kurt’s post, sharing his recent experience: “We took my wife’s TRD Pro to Tahoe last weekend, and I was shocked at how terrible the range on a single tank is. My Tundra TRD Pro has 450 miles on a single tank vs. the 250 on the Tacoma. How are we supposed to go on longer off-road adventures with such a small range?”
It’s worth noting that Dan’s Tacoma was modified with larger tires and a roof rack, which do impact fuel efficiency. Even so, his point highlights a growing frustration among Tacoma fans who expected more from the latest iteration of their beloved truck.
Michael Tumbow added his voice to the chorus of criticism: “The smaller tank was really a wrong call by Toyota. The larger and normal-size 21-gallon tank would really have been welcomed on this pickup and seriously does not add that much more weight. It is the biggest single complaint I have about this pickup.”
Why This Frustration Matters to You
If you’re someone who values efficiency and practicality on long drives or off-road trips, this conversation is crucial. Toyota’s decision to shrink the tank could directly impact how often you need to stop which is a significant factor for those exploring remote areas where gas stations are few and far between.
Moreover, understanding this issue now can help you make an informed decision if you’re considering purchasing a 2024 Tacoma. For those already driving one, it might even inspire creative solutions, such as carrying extra fuel or planning routes more strategically to accommodate the shorter range.
This debate also serves as a reminder of how important community feedback is. Owners’ voices often influence manufacturers to make changes in subsequent models. By joining the conversation, you’re not just airing frustrations, you’re contributing to potential improvements in the future.
The Outdoorsman’s Dilemma
The outdoors beckons with promises of adventure, but that promise is hindered when a smaller gas tank limits your range. For the typical outdoor enthusiast, someone who thrives on venturing deep into uncharted territories, this design choice feels like a step backward.
The frustration shared by Kurt, Dan, Michael, and others underscores the gap between Toyota’s engineering decisions and the needs of its core Tacoma audience. While the 4th-gen Tacoma brings improvements like better suspension and an updated powertrain, it’s clear that a larger tank would have elevated its appeal among the off-road crowd.
What’s Your Take?
As Toyota Tacoma owners and enthusiasts, your voice matters. What do you think of the new gas tank size? Have you experienced similar frustrations on road trips or off-road adventures?
Harutiun Hareyan is reporting Toyota news at Torque News. His automotive interests and vast experience test-riding new cars give his stories a sense of authenticity and unique insights. Follow Harutiun on Twitter at @HareyanHarutiun for daily Toyota, Tesla, and other car brand news.
Comments
You need the 35 gallon tank…
Permalink
You need the 35 gallon tank on the 1989 3500 Dodge Van, 15 passenger.
I bought my first SR5 in…
Permalink
In reply to You need the 35 gallon tank… by Marc Baruti (not verified)
I bought my first SR5 in 1976. Last Tacoma fifteen years ago. My current ride is an F-150 2.7 ecoboost, getting 21 after 21k miles. With a 36 gallon tank. And it can pull a 7000 lb trailer.
What? 2.7 liter engine=21…
Permalink
In reply to I bought my first SR5 in… by Stefan Thomas (not verified)
What? 2.7 liter engine=21 mpg?
My 2015, V8, F150 got 23 mpg.
This is nothing new tho…
Permalink
This is nothing new tho. Tacoma range was a problem in the 3rd gen too. Out the door my 2017 TRD OR could get 350+ driving conservatively. Which is arguably better but after years and some overland mods I get 250 freeway. Seems like just another all too common case of people not doing research before throwing down $50k
If you have to stop every…
Permalink
If you have to stop every 200 miles, that means you're only getting about 11 MPG. Sounds like and efficiency issue to me. I have an all wheel drive Durango with a Hemi and even loaded down with stuff in the cargo area I get about 19 mpg on the highway. Proof that slapping turbos on everything doesn't make them better.
Do you not see the boat he…
Permalink
In reply to If you have to stop every… by J (not verified)
Do you not see the boat he is pulling? Even my ram 2500 get worse gas mileage when I’m pulling a heavy trailer. My FJ also goes down to around 10mpg when I’m pulling my camper.
Good point. I think his…
Permalink
In reply to If you have to stop every… by J (not verified)
Good point. I think his efficiency problem was his bigger tires rather than the car itself. a 4th gen without any mods makes more than that. I's just interesting why they went with a smaller tank on the new tacoma
Exactly. My 2023 Ford Ranger…
Permalink
In reply to If you have to stop every… by J (not verified)
Exactly. My 2023 Ford Ranger gets at least 350-375 miles on a tank, an 18 gallon tank.
In a highway trip, my truck gets up to 23 mpg.
Not what you drive it's how…
Permalink
In reply to If you have to stop every… by J (not verified)
Not what you drive it's how you drive it.
After 4 Tacoma's got a…
Permalink
After 4 Tacoma's got a Maverick - 13 gallon gas tank and over 500 miles per tank!
While you’re pulling a 3,000…
Permalink
In reply to After 4 Tacoma's got a… by Russ (not verified)
While you’re pulling a 3,000 pound trailer like the author is?
That's just a stock picture…
Permalink
In reply to While you’re pulling a 3,000… by Bob (not verified)
That's just a stock picture from Toyota. In his post I don't think he mentioned towing anything.
Cool thing about ice…
Permalink
Cool thing about ice vehicles is you can slap a new tank in one pretty easy, especially a truck.
Ridiculous comment. Bigger…
Permalink
In reply to Cool thing about ice… by Ryan (not verified)
Ridiculous comment. Bigger concern is when your transmission, coolant system, or oil pan leaks. Wait! EVs don’t have those. Good luck riding with that…
Hi Ryan, thanks for the…
Permalink
In reply to Cool thing about ice… by Ryan (not verified)
Hi Ryan, thanks for the comment. I'm sure down the line a company will offer a bigger tank as an accessory you can bolt in with existing parts still fitting. I'm sure the outdoorsman would find that attractive
The way they design new…
Permalink
In reply to Cool thing about ice… by Ryan (not verified)
The way they design new vehicles this will have to be done at model after the engineers reconfigure the setup of the vehicle.
Finally, a relatable article…
Permalink
Finally, a relatable article about range limitations on our ICE vehicles. All the inks spilled about range is centered on EV drivers as if they're the only ones who need to fill up.
Large utility vehicles and road trip cars need to get at least 300 if not 350 mi of range when fully loaded.
I agree. I think ICE run…
Permalink
In reply to Finally, a relatable article… by Whistlin diesel (not verified)
I agree. I think ICE run cars need to also focus on this. Some drive with a heavy foot (like me) while others are more conservative with their gas. But in the end it's still an important issue.
18.2 vs 21 is 13.5 %. It's…
Permalink
18.2 vs 21 is 13.5 %. It's only 25 miles difference at 11 mpg. You need to buy a better mpg truck.
It's more than 13% different…
Permalink
In reply to 18.2 vs 21 is 13.5 %. It's… by Joseph McAteer (not verified)
It's more than 13% different. With a low mileage vehicle getting around 15 mpg, you are looking at stopping for gas with 4 gallons left (60 miles). So an 18 gal tank gives you around 14 gallons usable before you get nervous. The 21 gal tank gives you 17 gallons usable. 17 gallons is 21% more than 14, which is getting significant. Seems like 24 gallons would probably be about right.
I think the 11mpg he gets is…
Permalink
In reply to 18.2 vs 21 is 13.5 %. It's… by Joseph McAteer (not verified)
I think the 11mpg he gets is because of his bigger tires and roof rack. The stock 4th gen gets more than 11mpg.
What it only gets 11 mpg
Permalink
What it only gets 11 mpg
Do you see the boat he is…
Permalink
In reply to What it only gets 11 mpg by Toni (not verified)
Do you see the boat he is towing?
Unless my calculations are…
Permalink
Unless my calculations are wrong, you're getting eleven miles to the gallon. That doesn't sound like very good gas milage to me.
I've done lots of traveling…
Permalink
I've done lots of traveling over the years. At 200 miles, its generally time to take a bathroom break and stretch the legs.
You can always bring a gas can too.
Besides, if you're towing, the larger tanks in previous models ain't gonna get you that much further, imo.
As a long term Tacoma…
Permalink
As a long term Tacoma enthusiast. If you are a current owner of the 2024 version. One realistic solution would be to just carry extra fuel, as part of your trip planning protocol. Which would allow you to enjoy your off-road adventures and longer road trips…
I agree. Plus, having a few…
Permalink
In reply to As a long term Tacoma… by Craig Cooper (not verified)
I agree. Plus, having a few jerry cans on the side of your Tacoma adds so many cool points on the road.
Toyota needs to fire…
Permalink
Toyota needs to fire whatever Prius driving soyboy that came up with decisions like this. No different than the genius move years ago of deleting the driver's side grab handle on Tundras.
So buy a bigger truck.2.8…
Permalink
So buy a bigger truck.2.8 gallons more in the gen3 meant another 40 miles?
Wait till your a little…
Permalink
Wait till your a little older. You will only have a 200 mile bladder range.
Pagination