2020 Ford Ranger Lariat
Jimmy Dinsmore's picture

Why The Ford Ranger Is Already Better Than The Toyota Tacoma

Ford Ranger returned to compact truck segment in 2019 while Tacoma had been dominating the segment practically unchallenged. Now in its second model year, the Ranger adds FX2 off-road package to rival Toyota’s TRD.
Advertisement

My first time in the Ford Ranger was right after Ford relaunched the smaller truck in 2019. The model I was in was stripped down and bare boned. In my review back then I was critical of how outdated the Ranger felt and how it lacked much of the pizzazz needed to compete in the truck segment.

While it’s true that trucks aren’t always glitzy and glamorous, especially in the compact truck segment, they still need to have enough. After spending a week in the 2020 Ford Ranger Lariat Supercrew, I’m ready to proclaim that the Ranger can compete with the Toyota Tacoma.

The Ranger and Tacoma are familiar rivals. The Tacoma has been around since 1995. At that time sales of the Ranger were starting to tail off a little. Ford would eventually eliminate the Ranger in the North American market by 2012, while the Tacoma remained, almost unrivaled as other auto manufacturers also jumped out of the segment. And as my colleague John Goreham wrote, the Tacoma has thrived atop the segment.

As such, Toyota was able to gain a strong footing amongst consumers who wanted a smaller truck. But, during this time, Toyota got somewhat complacent. And as Ford re-engaged in the segment, Toyota could no longer sit back on its laurels with the Tacoma.

2020 Toyota Tacoma TRD

Towing and Payload Comparison
You hear a lot about payload and towing in the full-size truck segment, where Ford dominates with the F-150, but since re-engaging in the compact truck segment with the Ranger, Ford has decided to make an emphasis on how much of a work-capable truck the Ranger is.

And it shows as the Ranger beats the Tacoma in both payload and maximum towing capacity. The Ranger leads the segment with a payload of 1,650 pounds, compared to the Tacoma’s 1,095 pounds. Standard towing, Tacoma takes the edge, but when properly equipped with maximum towing capacity, the Ranger wins the head-to-head battle with a max towing capacity of 7,500 pounds compared to the Tacoma’s 6,400 pounds.

If these are the numbers the consumer looks at, then the Ranger wins handily.

2020 Ford Ranger Lariat

Tale of the tape: Tacoma vs. Ranger
It’s funny, I remember the Ranger of the 1990s and early 2000s as looking and feeling small. My first impression from the 2019 Ranger was that it looked like it was the same size as the F-150 and it certainly drove big.

That isn’t necessarily the case with the Tacomas I’ve driven. The Tundra drives big and hulky. And the Tacoma, even with the rugged and rough-riding TRD trim, still doesn’t feel like a behemoth. I will say that my time in the 2020 Ranger it did feel smaller and drove smaller.

2020 Ford Ranger Lariat

That’s a good thing, to be clear. And looking at the dimensions it’s a weird head-to-head comparison. The Tacoma wins the tale of the tape in length with 212.3 inches to the Ranger’s 210.8. The Tacoma also edges out on wheelbase by a small fraction.

The Ranger is 10 inches wider than the Tacoma and nearly an inch taller. And the bed length, one of the biggest selling points for truck consumers, the Ranger is much bigger with a bed length of 72.8 inches to the Tacoma’s 60.5 inches.

2020 Ford Ranger driver select knob

Comparing the engines of the Toyota Tacoma to the Ford Ranger
Where I believe Toyota has sat still for too long is in the powertrain of the Tacoma. The Tacoma only has a six-speed automatic transmission that is adequate, but uninspiring. In the 2020 Ford Ranger there’s Ford’s new 10-speed automatic transmission. It throws the shifts around seamlessly and does a great job in the lower gears too.

When driving a truck, even a smaller one, it’s all about torque for me. While the Tacoma’s engine puts out slightly more horsepower (278 hp compared to 270 hp), the Ranger’s 2.3-liter four-cylinder turbocharged engine offers up significantly more torque than the Tacoma (310 lb.-ft. to 265 lb.-ft.

The energetic turbocharged engine in the Ranger feels more vibrant and more powerful. Ford has really done a great job with their turbo technology in both the Ranger and the F-150 (and even the Mustang for that matter).

The Ranger also wins the fuel economy battle with the Tacoma clocking in at 18 mpg/city and 22 mpg/highway to the Ranger’s 20/24 rating.

2020 Ford Ranger steering

Off road capability: Ranger FX4 vs. Tacoma TRD
Ford knew they were behind in this consideration so they added the FX2 package to the Ranger in the 2020 model year. When appointed with the FX4 it is pretty rugged and capable.

There aren’t true measurables to determine which one is better, but Toyota has mastered the off-road trim by offering a special, and pricey, TRD trim. It is a beast off the beaten path. So the Tacoma won’t get outdueled in the mud and rock by the Ranger, even one appointed with the FX2 of FX4 trim.

The Ranger I drove was able to toggle between two-wheel drive and four-wheel low or high. That is a nice option to only use all the wheels when you need them, rather than all the time, and costing fuel economy too.

2020 Ford Ranger Lariat Interior

Comparing the interior of the Ford Ranger to the Toyota Tacoma
Toyota has sat back for a while and let a lot of their competition catch them in interior quality. It’s especially obvious when looking at some of their sedan line. In the truck world, it’s also the case.

While the Ranger isn’t dripping with luxury (like some F-150 trims), it has enough. My tester was the Lariat trim which is the swankiest trim available. It comes with remote start, Ford’s SYNC3 infotainment system, and leather-wrapped steering wheel and shift knob.

I often think trucks are too over-the-top appointed, and thus too expensive, so I think the Ranger finds its sweet spot when it comes to appointments and touch points. Comparing the two, the Ranger’s interior feels a little more updated and a little nicer than the Tacoma’s.

Both infotainment systems are easy to use, but I do like the vast improvements Ford’s made to the Sync3 system and I look forward to the soon-to-be-released Sync4. Toyota is due a major overhaul of the Tacoma and of the interior for sure in order to remain relevant.

2020 Ford Ranger Lariat FX4

Which is more expensive, the Toyota Tacoma or the Ford Ranger?
Price is king. It’s really hard to do an apples-to-apples comparison of the two trucks, but looking at the Toyota Tacoma Limited vs. the Ford Ranger Lariat Supercab and the Ranger is less expensive (depending on how it’s appointed).

According to cargurus.com, the 2020 Tacoma has an average price paid of $39,907 to the Ranger’s $35,137. My tester was fully loaded and had a starting price of $38,675. With options and the Lariat package it had a final MSRP of $46,990.

I always hear about prices from readers and I get it. Everything is expensive, even these smaller trucks.

So, there’s a pretty fair comparison of the Toyota Tacoma and the Ford Ranger. As always, things are subjective. I like both trucks. If you had asked me last year which I liked better, I would’ve given the edge to the Tacoma. But after an impressive week with the 2020 Ranger, appointed the way I like it, the edge in my book goes slightly to the Ranger now. Hey, competition is good, so hopefully this segment continues to heat up and the consumer wins out with the ensuing competition.

I want to hear from you tried and true Toyota fans out there too. Where did I go wrong? Am I wrong? Leave your comments for a good discussion.

Jimmy Dinsmore has been an automotive journalist for more than a decade and been a writer since the high school. His Driver’s Side column features new car reviews and runs in several newspapers throughout the country. He is also co-author of the book “Mustang by Design” and “Ford Trucks: A Unique Look at the Technical History of America’s Most Popular Truck”. Also, Jimmy works in the social media marketing world for a Canadian automotive training aid manufacturing company. Follow Jimmy on Facebook, Twitter, at his special Ford F-150 coverage on Twitter and LinkedIn. You can read the most of Jimmy's stories by searching Torque News Ford for daily Ford vehicle report.


Subscribe to Torque News on YouTube.


Follow Torque News on YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.

Comments

I think Ford has done well with the Ranger and it would be a serious consideration for me. I have a hard time calling it a "compact" truck, though. It is more of a mid-size truck, and I think that Ford even calls it that. So, for a utility, do-everything work vehicle for a home owner that doesn't feel like it overwhelms the driveway, I think it is still a bit large. I have read rumors of a smaller Ford truck in the works that I will be interested to see. For now, I think I'll stick with my trusted but aging S10. If Toyota would make a Prime version of their Tacoma, that would be a game changer.
I agree on the compact status. It's pretty big and feels more midsize.
Ya but 20 years down the road tell me which one is still going to be driving like new and actually have a resale value worth boasting. Toyota!!!! Toyota all the way. everything else is a wasted investment in the long run.
I can attested to that...have a 2005 TRD Sport 4x4 4dr. w/203,xxx miles that drives very similar to my 2016 TRD Sport 4x4 4dr. w/40,xxx miles...every feature and options on the 05 still works fine...I’m most impressed with the ride quality...no rattles... Suspension tight....plus if I decide to sell my 05 I know I can still get $10,000 plus off an msrp of $32,565.....
Just briefly looking online it seems as though you are not doing an apples to apples comparison. The Tacoma has a long bed as well up to 73.3 inches. Payload ranges from 1100-1620. Plus, if there is a hybrid coming soon and the tundra specs give any indication with a twin turbo hybrid I am assuming Toyota will put a nice kick in the tacoma. Mileage will probably jump to high 20's as well. I have a long bed Tacoma and love it. Plus one more thing that should always be talked and thought about.... reliability. Ford cannot touch Toyota in that department.
I narrowed it down to these two and simply went w the Tacoma due to the legendary reliability. The Ford is nice, but the Tacoma is of legend.
Another contender has been left out 05-2020 Nissan Frontier has had more power then the Tacoma unit 2016. Between 05-16 the Frontier was at 265hp with Tacoma 236hp. Also the ranger is a little bulky to say compact granted the Tacoma and frontier have gotten bigger than their respective 1st Gen. But the ranger is the bulkiest of the group. I believe all these manufacturers have slid away from the true compact pick-up in the US. So people have resorted to either buy old, importing or custom build a true compact pick-up.
The Frontier is left out, because it’s been left far behind. Nissan either needs to refresh it or kill it off. The Titan is a gorgeous truck, while the Frontier looks unchanged for the last decade.
Talk to me when you have 350,000 miles on that Ranger and still have the original clutch, brakes, and have NEVER had any sort of major mechanical issue like my 2003 Tacoma. OH, and Toyota put a brand new frame under it at 308,000 miles. Ford would NEVER do that! Their products last AND when they screw up, they stand behind 'em! Tacoma for life! We now have a 2016 Tacoma SR5 in addition to my '03!
The reason ford doesn't replace frames is because they don't break in half from rust... Been a major issue for Toyota since the 80's.
The price comparison is missing one huge detail. Toyota's in general (especially Tacomas and 4Runners) retain their value in an almost ridiculous way. Having owned multiple Fords and Toyotas myself, it just doesn't make sense to go the Ford route if purchasing the vehicle. From purchase to resale my Toyotas have dropped an average value of $1500/year whereas my Fords have dropped an average of $6300/year... so even if you save a couple thousand up front on the Ford, the Toyota will be more valuable 12 months later. If you're looking to lease then maybe you can disregard that piece but if you're comparing purchase price that is a huge factor to consider.
When I was deciding on a new truck the biggest factor for me was bed size. The double cab Ranger doesn't come with the 6ft bed, the double cab Tacoma does.
Your note on bed length appears to be incorrect. You have the Tacoma only with a 60.5-inch (5 foot) bed and the Ranger with a 72.8 inch (6 foot) bed. The Tacoma also comes with a 73.7 inch bed, and the Ranger also has a shorter, 61-inch bed. The Tacoma "Access cab" (smaller cab) has a 6-foot bed, as does the Ranger "Supercab" (their name for the smaller cab). For the models with a rear seat, the Tacoma ("Double cab") comes with either a 5 or a 6 foot bed. The Ranger ("Supercrew") only comes with a 5-foot bed. Your bed comparison is not only incorrect, it does not note that Tacoma has more options for cab configuration and bed length.
It looks like a Toyota. Get original Ford.
I would bet 99% of Toyota owners disagree with this article. Put a Tacoma and a Ranger in front of any midsize truck fan, let them choose which one they would take for free. Reliability trust is something you don't push with biased articles.
Let's recompare the trucks in 10 years and see which one is still running.
I just bought a Tacoma with a 73 inch bed. This size is available on the access cab and double cab. Bed size is moot.
Traded a 2019 Tacoma TRD sport for a 2020 Ranger XLT with most of the bells and whistles. Ride is much better in the Ranger. Fuel economy is much better. Head room and seating comfort is also better. Hopefully reliability will be good as well. Love the Ranger.
Of course the little 4 banger with the turbocharger will get better mileage! And of course the Ford will cost less! They need to re-incentivize their audience, if they can find it. I'm 59 years old and I've had my share of American manufacturer's vehicles plus I remember my parent's expetuences. I've ALWAYS been disappointed with the quality of the vehicles. And I've REALLY tried to give them the benefit of the doubt. REALLY TRIED. Here's the lions share of disappointing experiences.... My parents: Brand new '68 Cutlass Supreme - dead speedometer shortly after purchase and they took months to fix it permanently. Brand new 69 Galaxy 500 4 door all kinds of carburetor issues. Brand new 65 Impala fuel gauge issues within 2 years. My dad always said cars begin needing repairs at 60k and won't last until 100k. He never had a Toyota though. Me: Brand new 79 Camaro. Dead tranny at 12k miles Brand new 86 Daytona multitudes of issues and had to rebuild the turbo charger at under 100k. Brand new 2006 Dakota they left a stray bolt in a rear wheel causing lockup issues - had to tow it back to the dealer at 150 miles when I was on a business service call 45 miles from my house. Sorry guys but enough was enough. In 2011 I became a permanent Toyota consumer and haven't looked back. I have never seen an American manufacturer's vehicle go 200k miles before falling apart. Not even 150k. But Toyota manages that feat with nearly all of their models consistently. During the recession I ended up having to buy some used vehicles to get me by as I put 40k a year on from my business. I bought a 99 Avalon with 150k on it, put another 75k on it and it was still going strong. Decided to buy a Kia with 50k miles on it. Fuel pump failed shortly after - fortunately dealer fixed it no charge. Completely fell apart at 100k. Then got a Camry with 100k on it. Put another 100k+ on it, still going strong, then traded it for my '17 Tacoma TRD off road 4x4. I love the crap out of that truck and I feel the safest I've ever felt in any vehicle especially in bad weather. Let's see how many of those Fords are still on the road after 200k. Then you can justify the price difference. But until then I don't see it.
That was my point. The Tacoma is long in the tooth. V6s with six-speeds are kind passe. Imagine if Toyota puts a turbo into the Tacoma with an 8-10 speed transmission. Would really be a great response to the Ranger. Toyota and Honda have sat back on the laurels too much and let the competition come up to them.
They will never do that as naturally aspirated vehicles last much longer and far more reliable than their turbo counterparts. Plus they don't need to. Ford, GM, and Chrysler new anything well assuredly be junk and fall apart. 4runners and Tacoma's are"long in the tooth" but what's going to be still running 20 or 30 years from now. When you go overseas they can't even sell these hunks of crap because yo the rest of the three world they know their are no good. I drove GMs for 15 years and they made me a permanent Toyota consumer for life. I put gas in it and change the oil. All I have to do. I bought my 2005 Rav4 with 90k on it. 203k now and still runs better than any American made anything on my street.
I have a 02 Tahoe with a 5.3 and it has over 270,000 on it and still drives like new. Don't slam all American cars. I'll trust the reliability of my Tahoe to any Toyota any day
1. Give it a V6 (longer life for a turbo and maybe no need for artificial engine noise- lol.) 2. Give it a split-folding rear seat. 3. Make some room for a decent subwoofer, for Pete's sake. 4. Give it a bed tie down system like the utili-track in the Nissan trucks. Then I will be interested.
Ranger 4 cyl turbo 10 inches wider than a Tacoma. Great mileage. Lots of cargo. "Properly equipped" greater payload and towing. Standard 4 wheel drive features. Tacoma, proven capable platform that operates everywhere. Narrower. Less payload. Decent mileage. Great off road performance. Have you ever driven a logging road or a fire road? I love watching the full size platforms stop because they are too wide. 10 inches? Do they repaint it for free? Cause you are gonna lose paint in the narrows. And a turbo? Even modern turbos significantly stress their engines. Proven platform going everywhere with a reliability that makes it the go to in the 3rd world, or a Ford turbo 4 banger? Sorry, its an awesome mall crawler, but it hasn't put in the miles in the dirt, mud, rock, and clay for it to displace the Tacoma. Someday, could be. Today, it hasn't earned it.
As a Toyota Master tech for 25 years of course I'm going to be partial to Toyota. Let's compare them after 10 years of service and see which one has the least amount of problems. Most vehicles are all good right out of the gate let's see down the road. Toyota prides themselves on durability and long-lasting vehicles
Hopefully for Ford's sake they have improved thier reliability. I have had 4 Tacomas and 1 Ranger. All of the Tacomas went 250,000 miles + with no repairs. The Ranger cracked its head at 92,000 miles. From what I have heard my experience is not unique. If I am paying $$$$ for a 4wd truck it had better last a while. These comparisons rarely address reliability.
This article did not mention nor attempt to extrapolate long-term reliability. That's not my forte or strength. But without question, Toyota is generally known for that.
I agree with Nathan. I have a 2007 Tacoma with 130k miles. Other than a leaf spring recall and a mass airflow replacement, everything else is working great. I am hoping to get another 100k by then i should have enough saved for a new one
I've owned Toyota, Ford, Chevy, and Dodge pickups. I chose the Tacoma for reliability and resale value. My last Ford Ranger was in the shop 30 times in 8 months under new car warranty and they never solved the problem. My last Toyota Pickup was 25 years old and ran better than the new Ford and got me 3 1/2 times the value of a similar aged Ford when I sold it. Nice bells and whistles, but let's see if it will make 400,000 miles with few repairs. I'm not willing to gamble $35k on it.
Except the Tacoma has an option for a 6' bed. Kind of annoying when writers don't include all the facts, or mislead people.

Pages