Skip to main content

Why the Hellcat Challenger Didn't Destroy the Corvette Stingray in This Race

A video surfaced online recently showing two journalists drag racing in a 2015 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat and a C7 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray and when the 707hp Challenger only beat (and didn’t destroy) the 460hp Corvette, the clueless masses took to the internet to claim very conspiracy theories but there is a very simple reason why the Mopar muscle car didn’t annihilate the Vette.

The 2015 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat is powered by a supercharged 6.2L Hemi V8 with 707 horsepower and 650lb-ft of torque while weighing 4,560lbs. The 2015 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray is powered by a naturally aspirated 6.2L LT1 V8 with 460 horsepower and 465lb-ft of torque while weighing just 3,298lbs. Even though the Corvette has a weight advantage of more than 1,200lbs, the Challenger still has a pretty significant advantage in power-to-weight ratio of 6.45lbs per horsepower to 7.17lbs per horsepower.

Hellcat Challenger VS Corvette Stingray on the Quarter Mile
On paper, the Hellcat Challenger should absolutely destroy the 2015 Corvette Stingray in a quarter mile drag race and with an NHRA certified stock-tire quarter mile time of 11.2 for the Challenger to the Stingray’s expected stock times in the 12.0-12.2 range, the big Dodge should beat the Vette pretty convincingly on a well prepared race track with two experienced drivers. However, out on the open road, results may vary based on conditions and driver skill so when Yahoo Autos' Ezra Dyer lined up in a new Stingray against the Wall Street Journal’s Dan Neil – we were all excited to see the outcome. Really, we were all excited to see just how badly the Hellcat Challenger destroyed the Corvette Stingray, but when the two were pitted head to head, the outcome wasn’t quite as lopsided as many people had expected.

The close race between the Hellcat Challenger and the Corvette Stingray caused many people to ramble on via the various social networks about how the Challenger really doesn’t have 707 horsepower or that it really isn’t capable of running an 11.20 stock quarter mile time. After all, the video below clearly shows that it could barely outrun a Stingray that should only run in the low 12s, but I can assure those naysayers that this video is a fine example of what should happen when these two awesome American performance cars meet on the bare, unprepared street surface.

Why the Hellcat Didn’t Devour the Stingray
The reason that the Hellcat Challenger only beat the Stingray by a small margin in the quarter mile comes down to the racing surface and the lack of available traction when trying to get away from the starting line. While the Challenger has a tremendous amount more horsepower and torque, I can say from my experiences with the beast that it is very tricky to launch hard. I made a few quarter mile runs with an automatic Hellcat Challenger similar to the one in the video and I was only able to muster a best time of 11.8 seconds on the unprepared race track. Those 11.2 NHRA quarter mile times were achieved by a professional driver on a very well prepared track in what was likely ideal weather.

2015 Challenger Galleries:
The 2015 Dodge Challenger Scat Pack in Sublime
The 2015 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat in TorRed
The 2015 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat in Sublime

Basically, when you launch the Hellcat Challenger, you are forced to baby the car through the first two gears before really cranking into the throttle. On the other hand, with “only” 460 horsepower and 465lb-ft of torque, the Stingray is much easier to launch hard so while the Challenger makes far more power at full throttle, it takes a few seconds of traveling down the quarter mile before you can put anywhere near that much power to the ground. However, with the Corvette, you can put all of the available power to the ground much more quickly.

This was why the Corvette Stingray jumped out to an early lead and maintained that lead throughout much of the quarter mile race, only to be caught and passed by the Challenger SRT Hellcat as the two cars neared the 1000 foot mark. Had the two raced on a half mile course, the beating would have been much, much more severe.

Comments

Tony (not verified)    August 5, 2016 - 12:14PM

In reply to by Skipstr (not verified)

So much incorrect information in here. You compared a base model Corvette with an NA 6.2L to a supercharged Hellcat. 455 HP vs. 707 HP. The Corvette price is $55k to the $59k you stated for the Hellcat. The $84k would be for the Z06 with 650 HP. Considering that the "big bad" Hellcat barely beat an NA Corvette, just goes to show that if this same race was ran again, the Hellcat would be absolutely demolished.

Skipstr (not verified)    December 23, 2015 - 4:38PM

I think that you guys should race the 2016 Camaro 2SS Vs the 2016 Viper, unless you cant get your hands on the Viper...... Lets keep this fair-

Tsig (not verified)    June 29, 2016 - 1:29PM

If you look at the drag Pak challenger they removed 300lbs just behind the door panels.. official numbers on the weight were about 3500. There's not a lot of weight to lose in the vette, it's still apples and oranges

Camaro77231le (not verified)    January 29, 2017 - 6:09PM

Yea I own a charger hemi and a camaro ss 1le with mods. I have a race license. The hellcat either charger or challenger is a one trick pony. There were a couple at road Atlanta and it's laughable. You pay any where bewtween 80-100k. And alls the can do is go straight. Now a viper acr is a monster but a regular viper is way to unruly on the track.

Hmmmm (not verified)    May 7, 2018 - 9:47AM

I do not own wither one. BUT, I did visit the track (Drag Strip) over the weekend with my cousin who bought a 392 ScatPack to play with. He owned a 392 a couple years ago but traded it in on a V6 for his wife, better gas less $ etc, economical choice for her. Any way there were quite a few Challengers present. Only one of which was a Hellcat. My cousin was saying he really had wanted to get a Hellcat, but the price point of the 392 was too good to pass on. I told him several times that with the lower geared rear end and Racing slicks that I didn't think the Hellcat would beat him, or at least be worth the high $ difference. Well the proof was in the "pudding".
The Hellcat didn't beat any vehicle at the track that day. The first run that I watched was between Hellcat and an older vette and the hellcat got spanked. The Hellcat didn't look fast at all. My cousin had already made a pass before the Hellcat ran, so by seat of the "eyes" the Hellcat looked slower. The time screen at the end of the track wasn't working, so I couldn't tell emediatly the times. So in short after researching, the Hellcat was running about the same times as the 392 Scatpack. My Cousing put a 392 gearing in the Scatpack and Hoosier race slicks on drag wheels. He has about 20K less into the used Scatpack than he could have got a used Hellcat for. And is running average the same 1/4 mile times.

Mike (not verified)    January 4, 2020 - 11:13AM

In reply to by Hmmmm (not verified)

This was in theory kind of an apples to oranges test they put on. Using the base model Vette vs top end Hellcat. Not even Z06 let alone the ZR1.
Hellcat and Z06 have similar price tags so why not compare Apples to apples and Horsepower to Horsepower? The ZR1 of course has more horses currently but a heftier price. And is set up with more downforce for roard races. Zo6 technically is as well with the down force I mean.
But it was still impressive the 460 Hp base hanging with the top dog mopar. Im not sure they would have wanted to go APPLES TO Apples.