Stingray on a wall

Imagining a Midcycle Engine Refresh for the C7 Corvette Stingray

Please SHARE with friends and include TorqueNews in Google Alerts for tomorrow's interesting stories.
There has been lots of discussion about new engines coming to the Chevrolet Corvette lineup in the form of new, high performance models, but there is an outside possibility that the Stingray could get a new engine before it gets a new look – albeit a long shot.

Since the 2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray introduced the world to the C7 generation of the fabled American sports car, there has been a ton of speculation about new trimlines and the engines which would power those trimlines. At first, we speculated about the possibility of a new Corvette Z06 or ZR1 and that speculation ended when the C7 Corvette Z06 was introduced with the supercharged LT4 with 650 horsepower and 650lb-ft of torque.

The C7 Corvette Z06 is more like the C6 Corvette ZR1 with its supercharged V8 and premium amenities inside and out, which led to more speculation about a C7 Corvette with even more power – which is presumably set to be called the ZR1. Of course, there are also the long-popular rumors that there is a mid-engine Corvette coming which will also feature a new engine of its own, and each of these rumors touch on the fact that the LT5 name could be reincarnated with the next super-Vette.

Really, it seems that every rumor about any new General Motors V8 directs us to the next high performance Corvette – whether it is called the ZR1, the Zora or some other unique name – because we know that there is a higher performance car coming in the near future. What we don’t ever seem to consider is the possibility that there could be a new, more powerful engine in the Corvette Stingray before the end of the C7 generation.

A Naturally Aspirated, DOHC Corvette?
With the exception of a few engines along the way, the Chevrolet Corvette has historically been powered by an overhead valve engine or, as they are better known – a pushrod engine. While other companies (like Ford) have gone to a dual overhead camshaft setup with their V8s, both GM and Mopar have continued building pushrod engines with a tremendous amount of success. However, information from GM’s dealer service computer system indicated that there is a naturally aspirated 6.2L V8 coming with an all-aluminum construction and, more importantly, a dual overhead camshaft cylinder head design.

When the news of this engine in the GM service system surfaced, the discussion around the automotive watercooler suggested that it could be the next super-Corvette engine, but there are a few problems with that idea. Most notably, if this new engine is naturally aspirated, it is highly unlikely that it will produce enough power to serve as a proper powerplant for a Corvette with greater performance attributes than the current Z06. Even with all of the modern engine technology at work, it seems unlikely that this NA, all-aluminum, DOHC V8 would offer more than 600 horsepower, but it seems perfectly reasonable to expect power levels in the high-400 or low-500 range.

That isn’t enough power for a Corvette set to dethrone the C7 Z06 as the king of the Corvette lineup, but it is more than enough power for a new intermediate performance model…or a new Corvette Stingray.


Please SHARE with friends and include TorqueNews in Google Alerts for tomorrow's interesting stories.
Sign-up to our email newsletter for daily perspectives on car design, trends, events and news, not found elsewhere.

Share this content.


Please explain how a DOHC engine is going to be lighter than the current pushrod setup? Every DOHC variant I've seen weighs more. Look at Ford's 5.0...
FALLACY ONE -- A DOHC ENGINE IS MORE FUEL EFFICIENT Actually the opposite is true. A DOHC engine always consume more fuel than a Pushrod 2-valve engine of a similar displacement and technological content. In fact, a pushrod engine is frequently more fuel efficient than a DOHC engine of smaller displacement! Why? Because a DOHC engine has four times as many camshafts and twice as many valves -- that equals more friction and more fuel wasted overcoming friction. Whatever "breathing" advantage of a DOHC head design is irrelevant for fuel economy purposes because fuel economy is not measured at wide open throttle. At part throttle, your throttle body is choking the engine and the source of ALL aspiration drag. DOHC engines' advantageous lie in its ability to flow enough air at high rpm (7000~10000 rpm). But to support operation at such engine speeds they typically have cam lobe profiles which have high lift, long duration and significant overlap. These type of cam grinds have poor intake velocity and lousy scavenging at cruise speeds. Unless you have a cam lobe switching implementation -- like VTEC or VVTL-i -- such cam grinds REDUCE output and fuel economy. FALLACY TWO -- A SMALLER DISPLACEMENT ENGINE IS MORE FUEL EFFICIENT The case for lower displacement equaling lower fuel consumption is shaky at best (just like the case for global warming). It takes burning X amount of fuel with a corresponding amount of air to make power. It takes power to move a car. To burn X amount of uel you need to ingest a given amount of air. Doing it with a larger displacement incurs a bit more friction from bigger pistons. Doing so with smaller displacement force fed by turbos incurs lower compression, whereas doing so by spinning a smaller engine to 8000 rpm incurs low torque numbers which necessitate lower gearing. Statistically the fuel economy impact are not very different! Don't believe me? Let's look at real world statistics. Example #1: The Cadillac ATS-V for example has a 3.6L Twin Turbo V6 with 464 hp / 445 lb-ft and a 17 mpg (city) / 25 mpg (hwy) EPA rating. The 2017 Camaro SS has a 6.2L pushrod LT1 with 455 hp / 460 lb-ft and a 17 mpg (city) / 28 mpg (hwy) EPA rating. Both cars weigh about the same and use the the GM 8L90 8-speed automatic with a 7.0:1 ratio spread. Example #2: The Chevy Cruze 1.4T has a (153 hp / 177 lb-ft) 1.4L turbocharged 4-cylinder with 30 mpg (city) / 40 mpg (hwy). The Honda Civic 2.0 has a 2.0L (158 hp / 138 lb-ft) 4-cylinder engine with 31 mpg (city) 40 mpg (hwy). Again, both cars weigh within 50 lbs of 2900 lbs. -- What we just engaged in is a scientifically discussion with real engineering facts. All the propaganda you hear by about "downsizing being the only way forward", and the practice of marginalizing everyone who says otherwise, is FAKE NEWS.