Skip to main content

3 Items Chevrolet Could Cut to Lower the Camaro SS Price

The Chevrolet Camaro has not been selling well since the 6th generation was introduced for the 2016 model year, but according to comments from company exec Mark Reuss, the V8-powered Camaro could soon offer fewer standard features as GM looks to lower the price to better compete with the Ford Mustang and Dodge Challenger.

This past weekend, Chevrolet introduced their new NASCAR race car, which features an exterior design based on the newest Camaro ZL1. While at the unveiling of this new race car, GM’s Mark Reuss told Automotive News that the company is looking to “remix some of the V8 options” in order to lower the price or in other words, the automaker is looking at removing some standard features from what we know today as the Camaro 1SS in order to get the entry V8 price point down around the Ford Mustang and the Dodge Challenger.

The Camaro has been struggling to compete with the Mustang and Challenger on the sales chart since the 6th generation car was introduced for the 2016 model year, dipping to some of the worst sales numbers for the Camaro since it was re-introduced to the Chevy lineup in late 2009. Needless to say, GM wants to move more Camaros and it seems that the best way to do that would be to lower the price. To lower the price, they will likely trim off some of the standard features of the Camaro 1SS (the “base model” V8 Camaro), so today, I take a look at which options could be removed without killing the fun of the Camaro SS.

Lowering the Camaro SS Price
For the 2017 model year, the least expensive V8 Chevrolet Camaro that you can purchase is the 1SS package, which starts at $37,995 with destination fees. The least expensive V8 Ford Mustang GT starts at $34,095 and the least expensive V8 Dodge Challenger starts at $34,090, meaning that the least expensive V8 Camaro starts around $4,000 more than the competitors. Chevy fans will point out that the Camaro 1SS has more features, more power (for 2017) and other advantages which justify the difference in price, but when it comes down to someone who is shopping for a V8 muscle car on a budget without any predetermined brand preference, that $4,000 difference is likely to lead price-conscious buyers to the other two cars.

In fact, since the sales numbers have proven to be relatively low for the 6th generation Camaro, I have spoken with many Chevrolet owners and enthusiasts, asking them why they think that the new muscle car isn’t selling better. In almost every case, their answer was “it is too expensive”, so it comes as no surprise that GM is looking to bring the base MSRP of the V8 Camaro down.

But what standard features do they remove to bring the price down without diminishing from the Camaro SS?

Trimming the Camaro SS to Compete with the Mustang GT
Although the Dodge Challenger R/T is in the same price range as the Camaro SS and the Mustang GT, the R/T package is considerably less powerful than either of the other two V8 models, as those Dodge fans who want more power can get into the Scat Pack model with 485hp for around $40,000, but for the sake of this discussion, the only models which really matter are the Camaro 1SS and the Mustang GT non-Premium.

The Camaro 1SS and Mustang GT differ with the following key features:
-Camaro comes with 20” wheels and tires, Mustang comes with 18” wheels and tires
-Camaro comes with Brembo brakes, Mustang does not (Brembo brakes are part of the Mustang GT Performance Pack)
-Camaro comes with a premium 8 inch infotainment screen, Mustang comes with a basic radio

The basic (non-Premium) 2017 Ford Mustang GT is not offered with 20 inch wheels at all, but to get the bigger 19 inch wheels and the Brembo brakes, buyers have to add the GT Performance Pack – which adds $2,995 to the bottom line. That brings the Mustang GT price up to $37,090, $905 less than the Camaro 1SS. Unfortunately, the premium infotainment system isn’t available at all in the non-Premium Mustang GT, so there is no way to add it to better compare the prices, but with the bigger wheels, tires and brakes bringing the prices much closer together.

If Chevrolet were to introduce a new Camaro 1SS package with 18 inch wheels and tires, a non-Brembo braking system and a simpler infotainment system, it seems that the company should be able to price the least expensive V8 Camaro in the same ballpark as the least expensive Ford Mustang and they can do so simply by matching the features of the Mustang. In the long run, offering smaller wheels, tires, brakes and a less elaborate radio won’t make the Camaro 1SS significantly less impressive, but that move should make it significantly less expensive…or at least the removal of those standard features should put the Camaro SS in the same starting price range as the Mustang GT.


Steven Heffner (not verified)    August 15, 2017 - 6:15PM

Buyer beware, buying a stripped down SS would be penny wise and dollar foolish. Just like the 34k Mustang, you will be driving a significantly depreciating car off the lot. A 2SS is a fine car, (a 4 seat corvette) for 20k less. (I have one of each) If u are limited on funds, u would be better served by buying a low mile used 16-17 for 35-40k. The features on the 2SS are well worth having and will be better in long term value.

John (not verified)    August 16, 2017 - 7:35AM

In reply to by Steven Heffner (not verified)

You are pretty out of touch of regular buyers obviously if you own a New Camaro SS and Corvette! Most people that want a Camaro probably couldn't even afford a used one. I personally could get the loan. But could never ever spend $1k a month on a car and insurance.... that is an astronomical amount of wasted money!!!! Any brand new car is depreciated right off the lot. Not just a base model.....

Aaron Waltz (not verified)    August 16, 2017 - 8:12AM

I realize car companys try to streamline things to make things cost efficient but it would be nice if chevy made something in the middle, for starters why is the only v8 model an ss, in the past just because a camaro was a lower model didn't necessarily mean it had a 6 cycl. Also they have engines like the 4.8/5.3/6.0l why not make a budget v8 model that would still seem desirable to motorheads, they could use RS, Berlinetta ect and use one of the truck engines they easily out perform the 6 and the new 2.0t. it would still be a desirable camaro that can still have nice sounding exhaust and still support motorhead egos affordable to the working joe. Alot of people that want a camaro but are on a budget dont bother with the 6 cycl. Car just look elsewhere, i know i wouldn't buy one. What muscle car enthusiast wants a camaro that sounds like a tuner car!? Yuk! Just my budget minded i cant justify an SS camaro working stiff opinion...

Michael A. Levenite (not verified)    August 16, 2017 - 9:20AM

I've been saying this for years, when I bought my first 5th Gen Camaro it was an LT/RS. It would had served my want, not necessarily need, but let's say need also the V8, albeit smaller 5.3(327 ci), RS is Rally Sport, in the 60's the first gen RS's were V8, it should now have a power plant that is it's own. I've been shaking my head for a while at this. I own. 2 SS's, 2010 2SS/RS and 2015 2SS, but I would had kept my first RS had it been a 4.8 or 5.3 OR 6.0. but at a 6.0 I would've just went SS. The 5.3 would be the engine to give fun, pride of ownership and something to work with on enhancing performance.

Jeffery Reed (not verified)    August 16, 2017 - 12:11PM

Before stripping the new camaro they should work on fixing there loose an an popping drive train. I played 48,000 for the camaro I. 2014 junk. But they wrote the book on the camaro before it was ever built. When you take it in for service they call it normal oper sounds they can show you the book

Bubba (not verified)    August 16, 2017 - 3:53PM

They can take out most all the crap and 500 lbs and it'd be a better car. Hell, I'd rather have crank windows and sliding seats any day.

Del (not verified)    August 16, 2017 - 6:18PM

Strange that price has become such an issue. Should have left Camaro production in Canada where cars are cheaper to build.

ROBERT F DORNER (not verified)    September 1, 2017 - 4:14PM

I would have bought a 17 1SS But the price was $39,000.00 + with an 8 speed. Dam I see 17 Z51's in the high 40's low 50's with a 7 speed manual and that's ware I'm going. I feel Chevrolet should make the next GEN Camaro into a 4 seat 1963 - 1966 Stingray. It would sell through the roof at their current high price. The Camaro chassis would work fine with that fabricated Stingray on their Cadillac/Alpha present day chassis...