Now that Takata has pleaded guilty to a felony charge in addition to paying $1 billion in compensation to manufacturers and individuals, the action has turned to civil lawsuits that allege major players in the auto industry had known of major problems with Takata airbag inflators for years but continued to use them.
Takata pleaded guilty Monday to a criminal charge Monday as U.S. District Court Judge George Steeh accepted the airbag manufacturer’s plea. It closed the criminal proceedings against the airbag-maker. In his ruling, Judge Steeh said that though he could have imposed penalties of up to $1.5 billion, he chose not to. His reasoning: Judge Steeh believed that given the scale of the auto safety recall that if the penalty were any higher, it might have forced the airbag manufacturer over the edge. The penalty includes $850 million for automaker compensation and a $150 million victim’s fund.
Takata Moves From Spotlight
While Takata now is inching from the direct spotlight of the airbag inflator recall, automakers are now taking center stage as victim lawyers claim the carmakers had known of problems with airbags for years but continued using them. The automakers named included BMW, Ford, Honda, Nissan and Toyota.
“They were focused on the low price of Takata’s inflators and concerned that if they stopped using [them], they might not have a sufficient supply,” court papers said. It “would prevent them from selling vehicles and generating billions of dollars in revenue,” a report, filed by Peter Prieo, lead plaintiff attorney, said.
The attorneys have provided some very detailed allegations based, partially, on documents provided by automakers. One claim, for example, said Ford kept using Takata inflators, even though their expert warned them against using the devices. Another automaker, not mentioned by name, described the problem with Takata inflators as “one in which a passenger protection device was transformed into a killing weapon.” The remark was reportedly made after an inflator ruptured in 2009.
Another document filed in court said that the “automotive defendants were aware that rupture after rupture, both during testing and in the field, confirmed how dangers and defective Takata’s airbags were.”
Not First Accusation