Ford 1.0-liter EcoBoost

58.9 mpg Ford engine will be a global game-changer

Fords new 1.0-liter EcoBoost engine has received international acclaim by winning the 2012 “International Engine of the Year” award for its outstanding fuel economy.

Ford has announced that their new 1.0-liter EcoBoost engine has received the 2012 “International Engine of the Year” award along with winning the “Best New Engine” and “Best Engine Under 1.0-Liter” in the awards presented by Engine Technology International magazine. The new engine from Ford combines the latest technology and delivers some incredible fuel-mileage numbers. All the attention and awards are certainly well deserved.

The new 1.0-liter EcoBoost engine from Ford combines the latest technology to achieve an incredible 58.9 mpg. The engine uses a turbocharger, direct injection and variable valve timing to deliver both power and fuel efficiency. There are two versions of the little 1.0-liter engine. The new Focus engine produces 98 horsepower (58.9 mpg) and the larger 125 horsepower engine delivers 56.5 mpg. (Note these mpg estimates are based on European standards and could be slightly less in the U.S.)

Pages

Share on Facebook submit to reddit Share on Google+
Sign-up to our email newsletter for daily perspectives on car design, trends, events and news, not found elsewhere.

Comments

People wake up! Ford wants you to think that this engine will get close to that 58.9 MPG in the USA. No way will it even get close to that MPG. Also, they compare a Toyota that get's 37 MPG using the American gallons to the Imperial gallons of Europe.
All true, but the article did at least point out differences in European and American fuel efficiency measurements. I think the key issue is not small variations in how mileage is computed but the more important story of real and significant gains in fuel consumption efficiency. That gross difference will persist when the engine arrives in American built cars.
They flat out said it wouldn't get thatin he US. So....
Even considering the possible difference in gallons (this is not clear in the article) the 1.0L would still show 47 mpg (US) if the correction is needed.
In the next handful of years, 3-cylinder engines will be taking over the small car segments and pushing average highway mileage over 50, just as high-output and efficiency 4cyl engines are making 40mpg the standard today.
the real game changer is 662hp and no gas guzzler tax. WOW
Being that this article quotes mpg figures for a European Focus, it leaves us all wondering if those are US gallons or Imperial gallons. An imperial gallon has 20% more volume than a US gallon, so the difference is huge. To be crystal clear for both American and European readers, the article must reference either US gallons or Imperial gallons, otherwise mpg figures don't mean much.
0.8 times 58 = 46 ish, European vs US EPA cycles another 5-10% reduction. In other words it seems to get similar mileage as current US Focus, is that true?
Not to take anything away from Ford, but back in 94 there was a 3 cylinder 1l Chevrolet Geo rated at more than 50mpg highway. That was pre-08 EPA numbers, so 15% exaggerated. In 95 the mileage dropped to 49mpg highway. That car was horrible to drive, very underpowered and in my experience, and never delivered even close to the EPA numbers. I got almost the same mileage in a Mitsubishi Mirage, and a Ford Escort, but they were much more fun to drive, far more roomy and more versatile. Oh, and they lasted much longer too. Fords engine looks very promising. In a Fiesta, it should be much better than the base engine with 5 more HP and a much broader power band. If they can get mileage into the mid 40s or higher, it will leave have no real competition, except more expensive hybrids.
The Geo was made by Suzuki and branded as a Chevy. Total pile of crap. It was a step sideways from the Yugo.
Look there is a reason it won all the awards , it has less parts weighs less is much more efficient, is said to be the smoothest running ford engine , has 20 percent more power 20 percent less emmissions and has been out over a year in europe. and yes their fuel is much better than ours they have over 100 octane and thats why they get better milage and more power than our crappy usa fuel. so usually usa cars will get worse milage and have less power but its only about 10-15 % Gee cant you people be happy a USA company who didnt steal taxpayers money is kicking some serious donkey rear. ? T3I could list all the improvements on this engine and there are many but I doubt most of you would understand them, if you are interested in the TRUTH , just google it there are several vids on why this is revolutionary!
I concur, Paul F. The power to weight and power to volume ratios are superb for this power class. The engine will also go down in history as pioneering the use of an oil-exposed cog belt to drive the camshafts. The previous example, of much less demanding application, came in the little Honda one-cylinder lawnmower engine. The acoustic and cost benefits of the flexible belt drive are such that its use will expand. Also noteworthy is the non-use of a costly balance shaft.

Pages