eVgo charging station with fast charger

NRG reaching out to quell concerns in electric car charging network deal with California


NRG is attempting to satisfy concerns over the company's deal with California to build a large electric charging station network, providing answers and solutions to most of the questions that have been raised.

Three weeks ago Gov. Jerry Brown and NRG announced a deal that is a huge step toward building the electric car charging infrastructure that California needs to meet the states environmental goals, but some electric car advocates are raising concerns and questioning whether the the deal will be good for California's electric car drivers. Late last week NRG provided a pair of documents previewing the proposed agreement between the company and the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). The documents answer most of the concerns and provide a glimpse into how the project is likely to progress over the next four years.

NRG's settlement deal with California breaks down to a $20 million payment to the CPUC, and a $100 million amount that will pay for a large electric car charging network. The network will be built and owned by NRG's subsidiary eVgo, a company which is already operating electric car charging stations in Texas. The documents we received from NRG's David Knox break out some of the details of how that $100 million will be allocated to different projects. However the deal is not finalized and has not been presented to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for approval, meaning it's possible the details will change.

A $50.5 million investment in a minimum of 200 electric vehicle (EV) fast-charging Freedom Station sites: The Freedom Stations consist of one DC Fast Charging station (CHADEMO), the wiring for a second fast charging station, plus some level 2 J1772 charging stations. NRG expects to install 110 sites in the Los Angeles Basin, 55 in the San Francisco Bay Area, 15 in the San Joaquin Valley, and 20 in San Diego County. Completion of the stations will be spread over four years, with 20% in year 1, 30% in year 2, 30% in year 3, 20% in year 4. The Freedom Stations will be owned and operated by NRG's subsidiary, eVgo.

The stations will be available both to eVgo members, and on a pay-as-you-go basis costing "no more than $10 per charge during off-peak hours and $15 per charge on-peak." This directly answers the Open Access concern raised by some advocates.

A concern we've raised before is the choice to support the CHADEMO DC Fast Charging protocol, rather than wait for the SAE J1772 committee DC Fast Charging system currently being debated. The committee is expected to standardize on a different DC Fast Charging system, and it stands to reason the investment in CHADEMO stations could be rendered obsolete. NRG is committing to support both current DC Fast Charging systems (CHADEMO) and the future system being standardized by the SAE committee. How this works out in practice is yet to be determined, and at worst NRG will have to install a second fast charging station supporting the SAE DC Fast Charging protocol alongside the existing CHADEMO stations.

Pages

Share on Facebook submit to reddit Share on Google+

Sign-up to our email newsletter for daily perspectives on car design, trends, events and news, not found elsewhere.

Comments

10,000 make ready sites. Not the 1,000 you reference. Where is the balance from other service providers who have risked hundreds of nmillions in the market, not just converted a $940 m liability owed to CA rate payer? Do you work for NRG? Certainly not fair and balanced, but a pure pure NRG puff piece.
To: JRRead: Your point is well taken.....you ask if the author works for NRG,...altough it would be forthright if you identified yourself and your company too. - Are you the same JR Read that is the President of ECOtality? (BL!NK service provider) - The same JR Read that is being investigated by Congress for an unexplained "missing" $7 million dollars from DOE grants (from the US taxpayers)? - The same JR Read that has been accused of giving his son, son's father-in-law, wife, and who knows who else, large payouts and "bonuses" from the DOE grants that were given to install EVCS for the EV driving taxpayers? - The same JR Read that is President of a company that is losing millions of dollars? Gues you could say that it "disappeared" in a BL!NK..... - The same JR Read that that chose to offer a "closed" network to EV drivers that aren't subscribers to your expensive system? Should I go on?? Or should I let Congress ask you and your family the painful questions?? Does "integrity" mean anything to you? RK If you are the same "JR Read"......then perhaps you should remember that people that live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones - because we might just start throwing back! But hey.... I'm sure that it was fun while it lasted.......
First, this article is one half of a two-article piece. This article presents NRG's answers to criticisms, and the criticisms are presented in the other article, linked from this one. The material NRG provided me said the proposal is for 10,000 make-ready outlets, at 1,000 sites.
10,000 make ready sites. Not the 1,000 you reference. Where is the balance from other service providers who have risked hundreds of nmillions in the market, not just converted a $940 m liability owed to CA rate payer? Do you work for NRG? Certainly not fair and balanced, but a pure pure NRG puff piece. I would welcome the opportunity to present the REAL situation that will stiffle EV investment in California.

Pages