VW Introduced A New Long Tiguan Based On The Atlas Crossover Platform.

Is Atlas-Clone Tiguan A Chance For Volkswagen To Maintain U.S. Control?

The introduction of a longer Tiguan at the Detroit Auto Show has some wondering whether VW will ever make good on its promise to let the U.S. handle its own marketing.

The Atlas was promised to VW of America (VWoA), a move that was applauded by dealers and other observers in the auto world, including the editors at Torque News. Everything looked totally legit, too. The usual round of press events, including a huge sendoff bash announcing the Atlas to the world and its special place in the VW hierarchy as the only vehicle, developed, named and marketed by a subsidiary. VW touted the Atlas as a vehicle that aimed at the heart of the American market. And, the automaker announced that since American marketers understood the U.S. market better than any Wolfsburg specialist VWoA specialists would shape its future.

Atlas Marketers Get To Work

Once the San Diego launch festivities ended, VWoA marketers went to work on sales strategies for the three-row crossover. Everything seemed set for the future. VWoA apparently expected Atlas to be the first of an exclusive set of models, designed for and by Americans. All was well as dealers waited for the buildout to begin in Chattanooga. The manufacturing team started filling the pipeline a couple of weeks ago, again to huge fanfares, speeches, dignitaries and the whole shooting match.

To some, it all seemed too good to be true; maybe it has been too good. Wolfsburg looked to be easing the reins, but was it really easing them or was it practicing another form of deceit?

We doubt that Volkswagen looks at it that way. However, we are not privy to the private water-cooler and coffee-fueled conversations that may be happening all over Wolfsburg, VW's world headquarters. However, knowing VW as we do, though we had hoped Wolfsburg had promised to ease up on the reins, we also knew that if might never let go of what it perceives as its prerogatives.

A couple of colliding coincidences seem to prove that VW's words weren't worth the paper they weren't printed on, either. First, the North America International Auto Show in Detroit was about to occur. Apparently, VW thought it might be a good place to drop its bomb shell. And, drop, the automaker did. While VWoA, which had formally introduced the Atlas with its attendant fanfare weeks ago, was limited to announcing a dress-up version of the Atlas, VW was able to use NAIAS gut-punched VWoA with a new, larger Tiguan.

Wolfsburg was able to grab every news cycle this week with its new three-row crossover, leaving VWoA, way out on a limb with nothing for cover. The parent automaker decided to add 10 inches to the wheelbase, giving Tiguan the same specs as the Atlas. Suddenly, Wolfsburg pulled the rug out from under VWoA. Wolfsburg gave lip service to what seemed implicit in its promise that Atlas would have the U.S. market to itself. Now, it turns out, VW has decided to show it is still the big dog in the house with an Atlas clone named Tiguan.

VW built the new Tiguan using the same MQB platform that forms the underpinnings of the Atlas. The configurations of each vehicle were almost identical, as was base engine availability.


Sign-up to our email newsletter for daily perspectives on car design, trends, events and news, not found elsewhere.

Share this content.


I get that this is an opinion column, but the comparison between the Tiguan and Atlas is incorrect. While the Tiguan has 3 rows it does not compete with the Atlas. It's a compact vehicle with its optional 3rd row being for occasional kid duty. Think of the two has a Nissan Rogue (which also offers 3 rows) and a Nissan Pathfinder. This makes me doubt any other points in this column because the author doesn't even understand the basic differences between the models. Instead, using this false narrative that VWoA is being somehow undercut by The Volkswagen Group. Please understand what you're writing about before publishing articles that have no basis of fact.
I have to differ with you -- a third seat does not an argument make. Let's look at a couple of things. First of all, Wolfsburg admitted, when it turned over marketing chores for America to VWoA, that it really didn't know how to market to the U.S., let alone build a competitive model in the SUV space. With that said -- and understanding that fact -- it is not far-fetched to surmise that VW would likely believe that a 10-inch longer Tiguan would be a competitive SUV in the U.S. Further, it isn't far from reality to point out that the longer Tiguan was announced at NAIAS after VWoA announced the R-Line update for Atlas and that the announcement for Tiguan made a rather large deal about the third rear seat. Now, you are correct about the size of the long Tiguan. It is about the size of the Audi Q5 or Rogue but, by the same token, it is built using the same platform that is used for Atlas, down to the wheelbase. So, you have a long Tiguan, using the same wheelbase as found on the Atlas, offered with three rows. To Wolfsburg, it is the perfect-sized SUV for any market. You see, there is a certain myopia in Europe that says SUVs have to be a certain size, usually shorter and smaller than their U.S. counterparts. The size difference may only be inches, as in the case of the Audi Q7, but the smaller sizes used in Europe are generally looked upon as the proper sizes for SUVs and larger crossovers. You also argue that the long Tiguan, a vehicle with a 185.2-inch overall -- 15.4 feet -- is a compact. I submit that it is closer to full-sized than you think. After all, the Atlas is 16.5 feet long, about a foot longer than the long Tiguan. Again, the long Tiguan is Europe's idea of an SUV or crossover, for the most part. My argument points out that given VW's penchant for believing that if it isn't "invented here," as in Wolfsburg and nowhere else -- then it is not valid is a feeling the runs throughout the automaker. My references to the Dieselgate fiasco point this out graphically. Indeed, the emissions rigging scandal owed is piquancy to the "NIH" syndrome. Because the diesel wasn't going to use a "proper" VW solution, then it was unacceptable and had to be changed and made proper for the automaker. Given this argument, it is not hard to assume that Wolfsburg believes it can reassert itself as the marketing leader of the automaker, taking it back from Herndon because it is proper for VW. I could go on, but I will wrap this up with a statement that I do follow vehicles, especially VWs, Audis and related cars and crossovers, quite closely. And, given a very long career as an automotive writer who does keep up with vehicles and technology, I believe that your conclusion is wrong as I do "understand" what I am talking about when I write about a topic. My piece was my opinion and I will stand by my statements. You, of course, are entitled to your opinion, as well. As they say, that's what makes a car race.