Consumer Reports calls 2015 Lexus NX200t a Worst Car Pick

These reviews seem to be a bit arbitrary especially on the point of the NX's interior which i thought bested merc/bmw/audi's compact suvs. Only lincoln was comparable and nothing much else. They also rated the car 74/100 which put it ahead of all but 7 cars in its class and the top one of those scored only 82 (not far from the NX). Anyways, i bought a lincoln instead of the NX (also against CR's advice) and im happy about that decision

it is simply inconceivable that #lexus can make a "worse car pick". the tester at consumer reports must have smoked or snorted something they need to leave the hell alone!

Very surprised to hear about the interior complaints. The Acura RDX has the look and feel of a Honda Civic and CR is knocking the NX ? Also, I doubt very much that the ride is rougher than an X3.

Consumer Reports (CR) focuses on value for those who want the most for a dollar. The analysis goes deeper than simple preference. I disagree with CR's conclusions at times, but have observed their objectivity to be consistent.
I found none of the quotes in this article that I checked to be in the CR full article, rather the article appears to paraphrase, in which case the use of quotation marks is incorrect. CR has consistent in criticizing screen interfaces, but also details how implementations vary. Also, CR specifically called out the interior panels and handles rather than simply blaming "interior bits" as the article claimed.
In closing, proofreading should eliminate phrases such as " ar its press launch" and "with its smaller diameter tires and higher profile tires."

The Lexus NX200t (RAV4 in Drag) is outselling some of its rivals through folks who want the "prestige" of the Lexus name but not the expense. As a driver on U.S. roads it's apparent the majority of motorists either don't know, or don't care, about the rules-of-the-road (move over for faster traffic, et al.), or anything automotive - Voila - a match.

I have owned an NX 200t (base model with Luxury package) for over one month. The base model is the largest seller of the three variants and the one inexplicably not reviewed by CR. It has performed well with a very good compromise between ride and handling with NH&V held to a minimum for this class. The delivery condition of the vehicle was perfect with superior assembly, fit, and finish. Nary a squeak or rattle. The paint is flawless. The seats are great with real leather surfaces. Real wood trim. NO problems have come to the fore so far. The new twin turbo 4 is really sweet. The blind spot, parking assist, adaptive cruise, and lane departure safety features all work perfectly and as promised. These important safety features are often difficult (if not impossible) to find on much of the German competition and part of costly option packages when one does. It's fun to drive. And, I mastered the mouse pad within a day. Although not really a family car, it is a good fit for couples and singles wishing for a stylish, sharp driving, but useful CUV. A 'by the seat' comparison quickly reveals that the NX is much superior to a RAV4. Could some details be improved upon? Yes, but the NX is hardly one of the worst of 2015.

The over the top CR review, as published in their September 2015 issue, is pretty snarky with a lot of too-cute-by-half prose which is at odds with their more reasonably balanced review posted on the Internet in March. In fact, the two reviews are fairly inconsistent with which other. There have been many positive reviews published about the new NX -- a big Motor Trend review being one of the more notable ones. As a consequence, the slavish repeating of the CR critique by some of the press without performing a broader investigation of what has been offered in reviews is very misleading.

The TV program "MotorWeek" concurred with Consumer Reports – the NX is lacking.

With the differing views of the NX I decided to take a test drive. I agree with just about all the negative findings of Consumer Reports with the exception of CR denigrating the interior furnishings. Example of agreement: "The very tight driving position is made worse by the claustrophobically small windows". My other observations: Having an F Sport version of the NX is beyond ridiculous and cheapens the F designation, also used for the RC F. Its standard, anemic, non-linier power output is embarrassing and annoying. The driving experience is one of appliance-like, no way luxurious or stirring. The engine belongs in a Pinto or Vega, and that's additionally reflected by a miniscule towing capacity of 2,000 lb. If this engine is the future of Lexus – I'll pass. There is more to the driving experience than fuel economy – especially at $45K.

I dont agree with this comment completely. I own this car and I do read about the cars a lot. I feel I made a great decision.Before I purchase this car I checked Audi,X3 and few more brands. Audi dont have any standard features like backup camera etc. I dont want to buy just a brand name for 40 grand. I can feel little negative points here are there but they are not really big. End of the day Lexus wont disappoint anyone with their quality and long life. I see many consumers given positive review about the car. I am not giving positive comments just because I am owning this but it is not as bad as what you have written.

wow what a bad rap. The NX has its place. Bottom line CR is "wrong... Cant really go wrong at that level of refinement for 36k I dont think your gonna find that quality at that price point in many other models...I found the vehical did not to beat me up on the road. Exceptional seats..and driving dynamics push it and the true nature of the car come out more than what you would exspect....no buyer remorse here.

I have owned mine for 5 months. Not happy. The actual MPG is 10% to 20% below was is stated on the sticker. The touch pad is terrible. Even the dealers Technology expert acknowledge how bad it was after I bought it and he was doing the familiarization with me. The sound system is the worst I have had out of the last 5 cars I have owned. My 2011 pilot had a better nav system.

Night screen for navigation is unreadable. You cannot make the screen bright once you turn the headlights on. Navigation useless at night

Good info, John. Had the same low brightness problem with myTV, until checking all the many settings.
Computers in everything - AI next...

Awful vehicle. Way too small inside, the interior ergonomics are pitiful, the gas mileage on average is like 16 and the awd (all wheel drive system) is fawlty.

Avoid.

Am contemplating buying a 2015 NW 200t and would like reviews