2012 Fisker Karma

Fisker Automotive lays off workers after the Dept of Energy freezes loans

Fisker Automotive runs into cash crunch, after missing milestones in the Dept of Energy loans program, due to repeated delays on the Fisker Karma plug-in hybrid luxury sedan.

Fisker Automotive, the designer and manufacturer of high end luxury plug-in hybrid cars, has run into a cash crunch and is laying off workers. Fisker is one of the recipients of Dept of Energy low-interest loans meant to jump-start electrified vehicle manufacturing in the U.S., but their plans have met delay after delay. Having missed one or more of the required loan program milestones, the Dept of Energy has frozen Fiskers line of credit. Which, of course, puts a kink in the company's plans.

Fisker Automotive is the brainchild of Henrik Fisker, a famed luxury car designer. The company focuses on hybrid electric cars and is currently producing the Karma sedan at a contract automotive manufacturing plant in Finland. Plans are to develop several other car models and to move manufacturing to a former GM plant in Delaware. The first of those new cars, the Surf, is planned to begin manufacture at the end of 2012 and begin delivery in 2013. That is, if the company can navigate this cash crunch.

The company was one of the recipients of the giant Dept of Energy loan program announced in the summer of 2009. Fisker's slice was $527 million, most of which was to go for development of the Surf and other later models, and reopening the GM plant in Delaware to manufacture the car. A small portion of that loan was to prepare the Karma for production, in Finland. Note that Fisker received low-interest loans from the federal government, not grants as has been done in other cases.


Share on Facebook submit to reddit Share on Google+
Sign-up to our email newsletter for daily perspectives on car design, trends, events and news, not found elsewhere.


Lesson to learn: don't depend on government or on meeting gov't expectations if you're running a business.
I like it that the government didn't just write a check and say "here, have some money" but instead put in requirements. The requirements were of the sort required for Fisker to become a real automaker. What I think may be the core problem is pushing for Fisker to go from zero to full fledged large scale automaker within a couple years. Seems to me that "instant automaker just add water" is unlikely to work in practice, and it doesn't matter whether it's government or private funding.
True, but on whom does the blame lie? It's probably on both ends, because I know that no gov't agency hands out money of any kind without politics being involved. A good parallel would be CODA, which has received no government money directly and, though it has changed its release dates, has continued on privately. I also note that they aren't doing much of any manufacturing here, likely because in order to do so, you have to either accept government money to afford the startup or to get around all of the red tape required to begin a business of that sort in this country.
IIRC Coda has received some government funding and also a lot of private funding. But both Coda and Tesla did their initial vehicle by retrofitting an existing car body manufactured by someone else, rather than design their own vehicle from the ground up. In Tesla's SEC filings they list this as a risk factor with the Model S that the company doesn't have experience (as Tesla Motors) with manufacturing a complete automobile and they could fail at it. I like that Tesla spent years building a great EV off someone elses chassis so they could get their feet wet as an automaker, and ditto with Coda. In the case of Fisker the Karma is a ground up design with almost every part custom to Fisker.
Good points.