Skip to main content

Bursting Tesla's charging station bubble

Now that we have had a couple of days to get over the grandeur of Tesla CEO Elon Musk's big plans for the future regarding the charging stations, let's look at the reality of the situation.

n/a
Tesla Charging Station

In signature fashion, Tesla Motors unveiled a huge, ambitious plan to build charging stations all over the country so that someone with a Model S could travel from one end of the country to the other without any road trip range anxiety whatsoever.

It was huge, it was grandiose, it was so.. Musk-ey.

Not that there's anything wrong with that. Musk is a huge figure, figuratively speaking, and has done some really awesome stuff that seems to have been pulled off purely by force of personality and determination. PayPal, the banking site that wasn't really a bank, Space X, the civilian space faring company that actually flies, and Tesla, the high-priced electric carmaker that somehow sells the cars it makes.. The guy is really good at pulling off the things other people laugh at.

Still, he's also a master of selling ideas. His presentation to the world to introduce the big, bold new charging station plans was big. Huge, even. It was star-studded, full of glam, and very entertaining. Yet it missed one very important point. One that most people who aren't electric vehicle geeks wouldn't have understood if it had been included, actually.

It's a little pesky thing called plug-in standards. You see, the world has pretty much chosen to use the SAE J1772 plug standard. At least, in regular, everyday, slow-to-charge cars they have. You cannot use the same plug that charges your Volt, Karma, or Leaf with a Tesla Roadster or Model S. They aren't the same and they use different connections. Tesla has a converter for use at public charging stations that allows their cars to work with a J1772 plug-in, but it only works at lower charge speeds and cars that use this plug as standard cannot use the new Tesla Charging Stations.

Funny thing is, Tesla isn't the only one using their own, proprietary standard. Another, competing fast-charging standard is CHAdeMO, for which there are already over 113 stations in the U.S. alone (1,200 more in Japan). Right now, there are actually more EVs on the road worldwide using the CHAdeMO standard than there are using the SAE J1772 standard, which has more than there are using the proprietary Tesla standard.

So what Musk forgot to mention during his grand gala presentation announcing the charging station network is that it will only work with Tesla-made vehicles. In other words, if you buy an electric car but it doesn't use Tesla's standard plug-in (patented, by the way), then you're S.O.L. using their network to drive freely across the nation. So if you can't afford a $60,000+ electric sedan..

To paraphrase the Soup Nazi.. NO CHARGE FOR YOU!

To compare this to what we're all used to, this would be like installing gas pumps that only allow a car with a filling port on the left side to use them. Worse, though, if the car's filling hole is not at least 2.87 inches wide, your spigot won't fit in it either.

On the other hand, this move by Tesla is much like how Apple took over the smart phone market. While Blackberry was the first readily-adopted smart phone, Apple came out with one that was prettier and had much better marketing. Even though it was expensive, could only be used with stuff they would sell you at a premium, and slower.. it had better salesmen and so it became the most prominent smart phone on the market while its competition slowly dies a cold death in Canada.

Except.. There's a huge difference between a $500 phone and a $60,000 car.

Oh, and another thing.. all that fast charging Elon was touting the other night? It plays hell with battery life expectancies. It's gonna suck when that expensive sedan becomes a brick a lot sooner than you'd expected..




Comments

Right on Brotha

Right on Brotha

Talking about killing the

Talking about killing the electric car II, revenge, bloody style. I think Elon will prove you fully wrong Aaron. After all, you are not the first troll coming his way.

How do you like the

How do you like the $5/gallon? I guess life is really soft on you. Btw, 26K miles on EV/PV in 18 months. So tough... not having to give a weekly donation to Big Oil and his trolls.
Talking about beauty and perfection, it might have escaped your attention that electro magnetic power is the strongest force in the universe and plasma (eletrically charged ions) is the main matter of this wonderful universe. Something to add to your pondering on beauty and perfection.

Ohhhh, you mean the one that

Ohhhh, you mean the one that makes that trip from the far distances of my roof all the way to the battery of LEAF? Yep, long trip that. It did not even have to come out of the ground, getting refined, spewing smoke of every kind to be made.
Just clean photons dancing with electrons, forming a current (fyi plasma), ionizing a metal (lithium, plasma again).
EVs can be nice for most people, as soon as the veil of lies is taken away from their eyes. I average 50 miles a day, not exactly a short range and the LEAF has driven every single one of them, power by the sun for every single one of them. It is that simple, like all truths.

I live in rural america....

I live in rural america.... still the LEAF works for me. If you do live in Alaska with bears, sorry for you.

Definitely not a candidate

Definitely not a candidate for the LEAF. If you can afford it, the TESLA is a superior car and would take care of you for sure. The rest of us (90% of US residents) can use the LEAF for most day to day use.
Enjoy the beauty of Wyoming. Magnificent land.
PS: www . recargo.com has the map with all recharging stations. However, with the TESLA it almost does not matter. An 240 (drier type) outlet can take care of it.

Remarkably misleading article

Remarkably misleading article from Torque News.

1) with any new technology, there is a proliferation of systems; eventually in a free market one system predominates. There are a number of flaws with the J1772 standard and the CHAdeMO standard. Third party reviews have placed Tesla's charge standard ahead of these others. Give it time.

2) The Model S is unlike any other EV (if you hadn't figured that out already). Other EVs are not capable of fast charge times. Furthermore, there are very few EVs on the road at present. There is no reason the fledgling Tesla Motors should feel compelled to support charging of other EVs. They are trying to sell _their_ product! Quit complaining. And as far as Roadsters, there are under 3 thousand in the WORLD. Not big numbers. Maybe the functionality to charge Roadsters and other EVs can be added on later but quit griping.

3) Tesla has designed their batteries to be charged unlimited number of times on the Superchargers, with no adverse effect to the battery life. The supercharger communicates with the battery management system and only fast-charges in the middle section of charging, when it is safe for the battery. This is documented on Teslamotors.com

SO quit spreading FUD.

Here's a reference re: no

Here's a reference re: no limits on supercharge cycles
teslamotors.com/forum/forums/no-limits-supercharge-cycles

BTW, FUD means fear, uncertainty, and doubt... which is nothing of what I posted.

the whole point is the

the whole point is the engineers have calculated enough solar per supercharger station to create net extra electricity.

First, it's not true that EVs

First, it's not true that EVs guzzle electricity.

But furthermore, the whole point re: the Superchargers is that the Tesla engineers have calculated enough solar per supercharger station to create net EXTRA electricity back to the grid.

It costs about $9 in

It costs about $9 in electricity to fully charge a 300 mile Tesla Model S. That's not a lot of cost.

Just a gentle hint: suggest

Just a gentle hint: suggest googling the definition of voltage, current, power, and energy. Utilities sell energy. Speed of charging does not change the energy spent. You just move the same energy faster assuming no crazy extra loss from the method (assuming fast charging does not cook things)..

Tesla advises that Model S

Tesla advises that Model S owners top off their car daily: plug it in when you get home. So you are not talking about a once-weekly 85 kwh load, but rather an additional ~10 - 15 kwh load daily. As noted this will increase your power bill by about $40/month.

It's going to cost no more to charge than a Volt, in other words. And the average Volt owner is paying about that much per month (some more, some less) to drive.

Well, I personally don't

Well, I personally don't drive 300 miles every day. If you drive that much, that's nearly 80,000 miles annually. Consider this: the average driver puts about 12 to 15,000 miles annually on their cars. As has been well documented, somewhere around 70 or 80 percent of the US drives less than 40 miles daily. So for the majority of Americans, a $9 charge would last them 300 / 40 = about 7 days of driving. So $9/wk means about $36/month additional on their power bill (assuming they don't go TOU or install solar to offset the power use, etc)

I think the article did not

I think the article did not mention a Key Fact. The Tesla Supercharge Stations are FREE.

I understand the non-standardization of the connectors quite well. But it is hard to argue with when the charging is free.

So some of the article's analogies like the following really are not fair:
"this would be like installing gas pumps that only allow a car with a filling port on the left side to use them."

Facebook Comments Box